Spooky Tooth Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 Does not matter - NU's kinks will be worked out by then. Even if you beat us you still don't beat us, kansas will always be kansas same as ksu will always be ksu in 208 games against your state NEBRASKA has had 38 off (losses) days. Disagree. If Mangino stays at Lawrence he could give KU the tradition in football that many KU fans want. Whether one likes him or not, he has done a good job at KU. Quote Link to comment
Spooky Tooth Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 Does not matter - NU's kinks will be worked out by then. Even if you beat us you still don't beat us, kansas will always be kansas same as ksu will always be ksu in 208 games against your state NEBRASKA has had 38 off (losses) days. Ilove differences of opinion, the spice of life, but what an odd take this is. A couple points to address... 1) If we beat you, we beat you. Who won 30 years ago doesn't get added to the score post mortem. It is not like you do not know what is coming up at this point. 2) KSU is a different school. Sorry that confuses you... 3) Combining records against different schools does not help make your point. What happens in Manhattan is not so relevant to what is happening in Lawrence. The same can be said for most states (California, Texas, Michigan, Oklahoma, Alabama, Florida, etc) , so does having only one major football prgram somehow cause you math issues? So now that I have cleared those points up, good luck to you too buddy. Stay classy. ku & ksu are the same to NEBRASKA - your a speed bump we hit every know and then - For ku football started 3 years ago and they're all pumping there chest. Teams that have no history and tradition will never understand what happens 30 years ago is still relevant to today. Don't get too worked up. South Bay is formerly known as Chad 1971 who had similar posts and idiotic rants. Check the woodshed or his Classy fans topic. He'll go away soon. Everyone has a right to be a homer on their own board, but being rude to a guest to this board (who has done nothing to deserve it) passes homerism. Jayhawk, keep posting bro. Sometimes agree with you, sometimes don't, but always like your posts. Quote Link to comment
Micheal Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 should be a good game, reesing is a good qb, we know this, hopefully the blackshits will be able to handle him pretty easily, GO BIG RED!! Quote Link to comment
JHaWk Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 Once we beat the skers I will personally order Mangino a large pizza with no veggies of course. WE SHALL FEAST THIS YEAR Quote Link to comment
SOCALHUSKER Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 Once we beat the skers I will personally order Mangino a large pizza with no veggies of course. WE SHALL FEAST THIS YEAR We'll see about that!! Not to question that Mangino will be feasting, but rather that you'll beat the Huskers!! Quote Link to comment
HuskerJen Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 I can understand their pick. 1. It is a local paper covering the team. 2. KU should have a very good offense if they can establish the run they will be tough to handle at home. 3. We have an unproven QB at the helm. (By then he will be game savy I hope) This will not be a walk in the park for either team and they both better show up with their A game or risk a thumping. It should be a good game. You forgot another point... 4. The game is in Lawrence. This game should, if both teams seasons go the way we expect them to, should be for the Big 12 north title. This is going to be a very good game. Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 Once we beat the skers I will personally order Mangino a large pizza with no veggies of course. WE SHALL FEAST THIS YEAR Doesn't he feast no matter what the occasion/year? Quote Link to comment
admo Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 I can understand their pick. 1. It is a local paper covering the team. 2. KU should have a very good offense if they can establish the run they will be tough to handle at home. 3. We have an unproven QB at the helm. (By then he will be game savy I hope) This will not be a walk in the park for either team and they both better show up with their A game or risk a thumping. It should be a good game. You forgot another point... 4. The game is in Lawrence. This game should, if both teams seasons go the way we expect them to, should be for the Big 12 north title. This is going to be a very good game. Yall have good points. I concur with both of you. At the present time, Jayhawks have a slight edge on paper. Its only May. No biggie. Quote Link to comment
SouthBayHusker Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 Does not matter - NU's kinks will be worked out by then. Even if you beat us you still don't beat us, kansas will always be kansas same as ksu will always be ksu in 208 games against your state NEBRASKA has had 38 off (losses) days. Ilove differences of opinion, the spice of life, but what an odd take this is. A couple points to address... 1) If we beat you, we beat you. Who won 30 years ago doesn't get added to the score post mortem. It is not like you do not know what is coming up at this point. 2) KSU is a different school. Sorry that confuses you... 3) Combining records against different schools does not help make your point. What happens in Manhattan is not so relevant to what is happening in Lawrence. The same can be said for most states (California, Texas, Michigan, Oklahoma, Alabama, Florida, etc) , so does having only one major football prgram somehow cause you math issues? So now that I have cleared those points up, good luck to you too buddy. Stay classy. ku & ksu are the same to NEBRASKA - your a speed bump we hit every know and then - For ku football started 3 years ago and they're all pumping there chest. Teams that have no history and tradition will never understand what happens 30 years ago is still relevant to today. Don't get too worked up. South Bay is formerly known as Chad 1971 who had similar posts and idiotic rants. Check the woodshed or his Classy fans topic. He'll go away soon. WHAAAAAAAA! some jerkoff doesn't like me - Where am I going so I can pack. Quote Link to comment
HuskerJen Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 Does not matter - NU's kinks will be worked out by then. Even if you beat us you still don't beat us, kansas will always be kansas same as ksu will always be ksu in 208 games against your state NEBRASKA has had 38 off (losses) days. Ilove differences of opinion, the spice of life, but what an odd take this is. A couple points to address... 1) If we beat you, we beat you. Who won 30 years ago doesn't get added to the score post mortem. It is not like you do not know what is coming up at this point. 2) KSU is a different school. Sorry that confuses you... 3) Combining records against different schools does not help make your point. What happens in Manhattan is not so relevant to what is happening in Lawrence. The same can be said for most states (California, Texas, Michigan, Oklahoma, Alabama, Florida, etc) , so does having only one major football prgram somehow cause you math issues? So now that I have cleared those points up, good luck to you too buddy. Stay classy. ku & ksu are the same to NEBRASKA - your a speed bump we hit every know and then - For ku football started 3 years ago and they're all pumping there chest. Teams that have no history and tradition will never understand what happens 30 years ago is still relevant to today. Don't get too worked up. South Bay is formerly known as Chad 1971 who had similar posts and idiotic rants. Check the woodshed or his Classy fans topic. He'll go away soon. WHAAAAAAAA! some jerkoff doesn't like me - Where am I going so I can pack. All he's saying is that you don't need to be so rude to fans of other teams who visits this site-which I whole-heartedly agree with. Now, if said opposing fan is clearly being a jerk, trolling and/or poking the hornets nest then fine, fire away. But, from what Ive been able to gather thus far, the fans from other teams on this site, for the most part, seem to be very level headed. Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 All he's saying is that you don't need to be so rude to fans of other teams who visits this site-which I whole-heartedly agree with. Now, if said opposing fan is clearly being a jerk, trolling and/or poking the hornets nest then fine, fire away. But, from what Ive been able to gather thus far, the fans from other teams on this site, for the most part, seem to be very level headed. Yeah, what Jen said guys. Come on, it's not like this is netbuffs.com. That website is like a cesspool of hate and filth for everyone. Quote Link to comment
SouthBayHusker Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 Does not matter - NU's kinks will be worked out by then. Even if you beat us you still don't beat us, kansas will always be kansas same as ksu will always be ksu in 208 games against your state NEBRASKA has had 38 off (losses) days. Ilove differences of opinion, the spice of life, but what an odd take this is. A couple points to address... 1) If we beat you, we beat you. Who won 30 years ago doesn't get added to the score post mortem. It is not like you do not know what is coming up at this point. 2) KSU is a different school. Sorry that confuses you... 3) Combining records against different schools does not help make your point. What happens in Manhattan is not so relevant to what is happening in Lawrence. The same can be said for most states (California, Texas, Michigan, Oklahoma, Alabama, Florida, etc) , so does having only one major football prgram somehow cause you math issues? So now that I have cleared those points up, good luck to you too buddy. Stay classy. ku & ksu are the same to NEBRASKA - your a speed bump we hit every know and then - For ku football started 3 years ago and they're all pumping there chest. Teams that have no history and tradition will never understand what happens 30 years ago is still relevant to today. Don't get too worked up. South Bay is formerly known as Chad 1971 who had similar posts and idiotic rants. Check the woodshed or his Classy fans topic. He'll go away soon. WHAAAAAAAA! some jerkoff doesn't like me - Where am I going so I can pack. All he's saying is that you don't need to be so rude to fans of other teams who visits this site-which I whole-heartedly agree with. Now, if said opposing fan is clearly being a jerk, trolling and/or poking the hornets nest then fine, fire away. But, from what Ive been able to gather thus far, the fans from other teams on this site, for the most part, seem to be very level headed. I didn't know that when you state facts that it was being rude. These other teams in the north have got a few wins since 2001 and they act like they've beat us for 50 years. No matter what these visiting fans think - ku, ksu ,isu, cu, mu will never be the PROGRAM Nebraska is. I'm so sorry if these people didn't get the ball thrown to them when they were in grade school and they're still sensitive about it but jeez christ quit your crying!!! Quote Link to comment
husker B-rent Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 Does not matter - NU's kinks will be worked out by then. Even if you beat us you still don't beat us, kansas will always be kansas same as ksu will always be ksu in 208 games against your state NEBRASKA has had 38 off (losses) days. Ilove differences of opinion, the spice of life, but what an odd take this is. A couple points to address... 1) If we beat you, we beat you. Who won 30 years ago doesn't get added to the score post mortem. It is not like you do not know what is coming up at this point. 2) KSU is a different school. Sorry that confuses you... 3) Combining records against different schools does not help make your point. What happens in Manhattan is not so relevant to what is happening in Lawrence. The same can be said for most states (California, Texas, Michigan, Oklahoma, Alabama, Florida, etc) , so does having only one major football prgram somehow cause you math issues? So now that I have cleared those points up, good luck to you too buddy. Stay classy. ku & ksu are the same to NEBRASKA - your a speed bump we hit every know and then - For ku football started 3 years ago and they're all pumping there chest. Teams that have no history and tradition will never understand what happens 30 years ago is still relevant to today. Don't get too worked up. South Bay is formerly known as Chad 1971 who had similar posts and idiotic rants. Check the woodshed or his Classy fans topic. He'll go away soon. WHAAAAAAAA! some jerkoff doesn't like me - Where am I going so I can pack. All he's saying is that you don't need to be so rude to fans of other teams who visits this site-which I whole-heartedly agree with. Now, if said opposing fan is clearly being a jerk, trolling and/or poking the hornets nest then fine, fire away. But, from what Ive been able to gather thus far, the fans from other teams on this site, for the most part, seem to be very level headed. I didn't know that when you state facts that it was being rude. These other teams in the north have got a few wins since 2001 and they act like they've beat us for 50 years. No matter what these visiting fans think - ku, ksu ,isu, cu, mu will never be the PROGRAM Nebraska is. I'm so sorry if these people didn't get the ball thrown to them when they were in grade school and they're still sensitive about it but jeez christ quit your crying!!! i actually agree with southbay on this one for the most part. i do not think that the KU game is going to be all that close next year. as has been mentioned, they are basically breaking in a whole new offenses line and their defensive line is just not good. Where do you win the game of football? IN THE TRENCHES! you could have barry sanders, randy moss, and dan marino in the backfield but it wouldnt matter if you had a bunch of rookies lining up in front of them.... i also think that Jayhawk was coming on here to stir the pot a bit (which isnt always a bad thing) because he certainly hasnt been on here posting the sites that have been picking the skers first, and all of a sudden he jumps on to say that the KANSAS city star picked the KANSAS jayhawks to finish first place in the big 12 north! just IMO. Quote Link to comment
redout22 Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 I can understand their pick. 1. It is a local paper covering the team. 2. KU should have a very good offense if they can establish the run they will be tough to handle at home. 3. We have an unproven QB at the helm. (By then he will be game savy I hope) This will not be a walk in the park for either team and they both better show up with their A game or risk a thumping. It should be a good game. Yes they are local but last year they were in love with Mizzou. They had them going to the Championship game. I completely agree with you on 2 and 3. Quote Link to comment
SaturnDrew Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 Seriously, it is so far away from football season that people getting all worked up over Kansas getting picked over Nebraska is ridiculous. Let's get closer to fall, heck, even maybe play a down of football (and no, not the virtual football on the other thread!) and wait to see what happens. I think Kansas-Nebraska will probably be one of the best games in the North. Then again, two years ago at this time, I was thinking Nebraska could be a BCS team. Nebraska's mediocrity over the last 5 years gives us no reason to say that we will automatically beat a team (even Florida Atlantic!). Let's go to a BCS game again before we start running our mouths. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.