HuskerfaninOkieland Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 LINCOLN — If there's one area that Carl Pelini wants to see his defense improvement in immediately, it's tackling. That points the arrow directly at the linebackers: Will Compton, Sean Fisher and Blake Lawrence. At times, the Huskers' young backers still appear overmatched, slow to shed blockers and, when there was a collision, quick to fall back. The apparent lack of aggression and physical toughness may be a result of youth and inexperience, not willpower. “They're all aggressive, physical guys,” Pelini said. “You put them in a tackling drill and they're going to rip someone's head off.” The difficulty, Pelini said, is having that mentality “after they've made the checks, taken the correct alignments, checked the receivers, checked the coverage.” “To me, it's almost a confidence thing,” Pelini said. “It is a willingness to let yourself go. Once you recognize and you see it, you go and you go and you go and you go to the ball and make the play in a physical way.” Click here to read the rest of the article Quote Link to comment
Axl_sued_me Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 How about penetration from someone other than Suh? Quote Link to comment
HuskerfaninOkieland Posted September 14, 2009 Author Share Posted September 14, 2009 Crick has had some good penetration. I think he even racked up a sack Saturday? I think by the end of the year, Crick is going to be really good and teams are going to have to decide who to double team: Suh or Crick? Quote Link to comment
CENTEXHUSKER Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 ...you go and you go and you go and you go to the ball... So Carl, do you want them to GO to the ball? Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 It's hard to say whether this is all a smokescreen heading into VA Tech, or if we're legitimately struggling to put pressure on opposing QBs. Logic says that if you want to play at a high level in your "tough" games, you should play at a high level in all of your games. We're not seeing that. Either these guys are messed up in the head, or they're not as good as we'd hoped, or our opponents are much better than we've been led to believe. In the end none of that matters - what matters is, we haven't put up a defensive effort like we thought we would yet, and we're heading into a big game against an opponent that can beat a lackluster team, without having put it together yet on the field. Can we win this game? Sure. Have we shown yet that we're ready to win this game? Not based on the performances we've put in our last two weeks. Quote Link to comment
AF Husker Fan Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 It's hard to say whether this is all a smokescreen heading into VA Tech, or if we're legitimately struggling to put pressure on opposing QBs. Logic says that if you want to play at a high level in your "tough" games, you should play at a high level in all of your games. We're not seeing that. Either these guys are messed up in the head, or they're not as good as we'd hoped, or our opponents are much better than we've been led to believe. In the end none of that matters - what matters is, we haven't put up a defensive effort like we thought we would yet, and we're heading into a big game against an opponent that can beat a lackluster team, without having put it together yet on the field. Can we win this game? Sure. Have we shown yet that we're ready to win this game? Not based on the performances we've put in our last two weeks. nice post Quote Link to comment
Vince from ShamWOW Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 It's hard to say whether this is all a smokescreen heading into VA Tech, or if we're legitimately struggling to put pressure on opposing QBs. Logic says that if you want to play at a high level in your "tough" games, you should play at a high level in all of your games. We're not seeing that. Either these guys are messed up in the head, or they're not as good as we'd hoped, or our opponents are much better than we've been led to believe. In the end none of that matters - what matters is, we haven't put up a defensive effort like we thought we would yet, and we're heading into a big game against an opponent that can beat a lackluster team, without having put it together yet on the field. Can we win this game? Sure. Have we shown yet that we're ready to win this game? Not based on the performances we've put in our last two weeks. nice post ditto Quote Link to comment
Malth Posted September 14, 2009 Share Posted September 14, 2009 It's hard to say whether this is all a smokescreen heading into VA Tech, or if we're legitimately struggling to put pressure on opposing QBs. Logic says that if you want to play at a high level in your "tough" games, you should play at a high level in all of your games. We're not seeing that. Either these guys are messed up in the head, or they're not as good as we'd hoped, or our opponents are much better than we've been led to believe. In the end none of that matters - what matters is, we haven't put up a defensive effort like we thought we would yet, and we're heading into a big game against an opponent that can beat a lackluster team, without having put it together yet on the field. Can we win this game? Sure. Have we shown yet that we're ready to win this game? Not based on the performances we've put in our last two weeks. nice post ditto +1 Quote Link to comment
BIGREDIOWAN Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 It's hard to say whether this is all a smokescreen heading into VA Tech, or if we're legitimately struggling to put pressure on opposing QBs. Logic says that if you want to play at a high level in your "tough" games, you should play at a high level in all of your games. We're not seeing that. Either these guys are messed up in the head, or they're not as good as we'd hoped, or our opponents are much better than we've been led to believe. In the end none of that matters - what matters is, we haven't put up a defensive effort like we thought we would yet, and we're heading into a big game against an opponent that can beat a lackluster team, without having put it together yet on the field. Can we win this game? Sure. Have we shown yet that we're ready to win this game? Not based on the performances we've put in our last two weeks. Couldn't agree with you more, we have the talent, but we need to put it all together to be effective. Quote Link to comment
BIGREDFAN_in_OMAHA Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 Recognizing the problem is the first step. I foresee heated tackling drills this week. Quote Link to comment
BigWillie Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 At times, the Huskers' young backers still appear overmatched, slow to shed blockers and, when there was a collision, quick to fall back. Could have just said this and gotten all you needed to know about their problems: strength You can have the athletic ability in the world and be relentless as a player, but when you are physically overmatched by 300lbs+ offensive linemen, it doesn't really matter. The good and the bad about this - in the conference games their strength disadvantages will not show as much seeing as how we will see so many spreads and more wide open offenses. Our base defenses will almost become the nickel and dime. The downside - against someone as physical as Tech will be this weekend, their disadvantages are going to be put on display. My hope - put 8 or 9 in the box almost every single play. I want us to literally dare Tyrod to beat us with his arm. If he can, then more power to him. Legitimately, I don't think he can though. Quote Link to comment
caveman99 Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 At times, the Huskers' young backers still appear overmatched, slow to shed blockers and, when there was a collision, quick to fall back. Could have just said this and gotten all you needed to know about their problems: strength You can have the athletic ability in the world and be relentless as a player, but when you are physically overmatched by 300lbs+ offensive linemen, it doesn't really matter. The good and the bad about this - in the conference games their strength disadvantages will not show as much seeing as how we will see so many spreads and more wide open offenses. Our base defenses will almost become the nickel and dime. The downside - against someone as physical as Tech will be this weekend, their disadvantages are going to be put on display. My hope - put 8 or 9 in the box almost every single play. I want us to literally dare Tyrod to beat us with his arm. If he can, then more power to him. Legitimately, I don't think he can though. Quote Link to comment
tmfr15 Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 The Huskers have had some busts so far this season, but, as long as they don't give up long touchdown plays, we should be fine. The defense can bend, it just needs to get Tech stopped before it gets into scoring range. Quote Link to comment
sdhusker82 Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 I think our secondary has enough experience to the point we can stack the box, put our corners n safeties in man, and pressure Taylor to pass. In the Bama game he looked terrible passing and I have more confidence in our secondary this year than years past. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.