HeyBurke Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 Everyone has an opinion about this but I think the fact that Nike has almost every professional super star and almost every top college program is all the proof needed to determine which is the best and which ones the kids these days want to be associated with. They get all those sponsorship deals with players and teams because Nike doesn't care how much money they throw around. Adidas was originally a soccer cleat manufacturer and they're based in Germany, so their presence in American football isn't going to be as big as Nike's. Quote Link to comment
Muck Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 Some of you old timers need to get with the new styles. Unfortunately twenty years from now when you are looking back at pics of yourself today and your wife and kids are making fun of the clothes and hair while you hang your head in shame none of us will be there to point and laugh. They get all those sponsorship deals with players and teams because Nike doesn't care how much money they throw around. Exactly. Quote Link to comment
Landomatic Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 Everyone has an opinion about this but I think the fact that Nike has almost every professional super star and almost every top college program is all the proof needed to determine which is the best and which ones the kids these days want to be associated with. They get all those sponsorship deals with players and teams because Nike doesn't care how much money they throw around. Adidas was originally a soccer cleat manufacturer and they're based in Germany, so their presence in American football isn't going to be as big as Nike's. Nike has all that money to throw around because they sell the most because they're the best and most popular. Simple supply and demand. If this were a German soccer forum, your point might be relevant. For football in America (and most other sports anyone in America cares about for that matter), it's Nike and nobody else. Quote Link to comment
Hoosker Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 I think a change to Nike wouldn't be that bad. They would provide the players with quality gear and perhaps have a special, "pro combat" uniform for one game a season. As a lifelong Nebraska fan, I love how traditional we are and how we don't conform to whatever is trending in college football, but if it would help recruiting even a little bit, then why not have at least one alternate ever year? Is that so wrong? Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 If we switch to Nike, I won't be buying fan gear I guess. Their shirts are sh#t. 1 Quote Link to comment
HuskerShark Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 Nike or Under Armour would be cool. I have always been in favor of having a sweet alternative uniform for us, but pro combat? Ohio State, Georgia, etc. all have pro combats and I don't exactly like them. I think Nebraska could continue to be our own unique selves and just have a black top with a white or red bottom with the same style of jerseys that we have. No need to look anything like this: Quote Link to comment
Foppa Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 If Nebraska were to drop adidas, I'd prefer a switch to Under Armour. Nike stuff is just cheap and poorly made. I guess 'brand name' attracts, but people are really concerned with 'quality'? Nike, UA, Adidas, Wal-Mart brand, it's all made by an 8-year old in a run-down factory in China, Vietnam, or Honduras, so what do you really expect with durability? Quote Link to comment
HeyBurke Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 If Nebraska were to drop adidas, I'd prefer a switch to Under Armour. Nike stuff is just cheap and poorly made. I guess 'brand name' attracts, but people are really concerned with 'quality'? Nike, UA, Adidas, Wal-Mart brand, it's all made by an 8-year old in a run-down factory in China, Vietnam, or Honduras, so what do you really expect with durability? From my own experience, adidas and Under Armour gear has lasted a hell of a lot longer than Nike. Quote Link to comment
okaive Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 As long as we don't get 48 different styles like Oklie light has from Nike, I will be all for switching. The apparel for regular clothing has gotten stale with Adidas. Quote Link to comment
walksalone Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Oregon, and Maryland have sweet uniforms, but keep that style out of Lincoln Maryland's uniform looks like ass, and I hope that they never decide to do that in Lincoln... The uniform threads alone would need their own site Quote Link to comment
Haspula Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Nike has some great uniforms. I wish our school would make the switch, Adidas is old Quote Link to comment
redblooded Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Wonder how that is decided? Ohh right, like everything else dealing with corporate sponsorship. Whoever piles up enough cash... not by how many fans fall for whatever marketing gimmicks these companies deploy (sponsoring teams being one such gimmick). (Also Nike is over-marketed and over-priced crap.) Quote Link to comment
Landomatic Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Nike's durability may be a factor for some of you, but the players could care less about that. It's all about what looks the coolest. They get all this gear free and get it replaced easily while they're playing so how it holds up is a moot point...something breaks and they just get a new one. Not to mention that when a fresh pair of kicks gets even so much as a scuff you gotta swap 'em out anyway. Quote Link to comment
redintampa Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 Nike is garbage. My sons pop warner team went to Nike this past year. Got brand new jerseys and pants. By the end of the season the numbers were coming off and the pants were frayed all over. I would avoid Nike Nike the plague! Quote Link to comment
808Husker in KCMO Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 nike is much better. there is a reason the nba switched to nike. What are you talking about? The NBA's contract with adidas runs for like, another six years. Probably meant to say the NFL. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.