NUance Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 OSU and Michigan bring in top Big 10 unitsby Josh Helmholdt, rivals.com, February 14, 2012 B1G 10 Quarterback Recruits 1. Purdue 2. Minnesota 3. Ohio State T4. Michigan State T4. Nebraska T4. Wisconsin T7. Indiana T7. Iowa 9. Penn State NA: Michigan, Northwestern, Illinois B1G 10 Runningback Recruits 1. Michigan 2. Ohio State 3. Iowa 4. Wisconsin 5. Illinois T6. Michigan State T6. Nebraska T6. Northwestern T6. Penn State 10. Minnesota 11. Indiana NA: Purdue B1G 10 WR Recruits 7. Nebraska B1G 10 TE Recruits T7. Nebraska B1G 10 OL Recruits 7. Nebraska B1G 10 DT Recruits 3. Nebraska B1G 10 DE Recruits 6. Nebraska B1G 10 LB Recruits 3. Nebraska B1G 10 DB Recruits 9. Nebraska B1G 10 Athlete Recruits 1. Nebraska LINK Woo hoo! We ranked #1 in B10 athlete recruits. Quote Link to comment
RedRedJarvisRedwine Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Another mind-numbing stat that has no value to anything that matters. How many ways can we be made aware of the fact that we took a small class and that fact alone is the major reason our overall numbers are down! Quote Link to comment
scarletNcream Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 If you read it, they ranked by the number of kids taken at a particular position. If you signed one WR you were dropped down in the rankings. Lame Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted February 15, 2012 Author Share Posted February 15, 2012 Another mind-numbing stat that has no value to anything that matters. How many ways can we be made aware of the fact that we took a small class and that fact alone is the major reason our overall numbers are down! Sorry you had that problem. The article didn’t seem to cause my mind to go numb. Anyway, I hope you recover someday. Quote Link to comment
It'sNotAFakeID Posted February 18, 2012 Share Posted February 18, 2012 Different teams are going to place differently based on who they recruited. The rating doesn't seem to actually measure what it was trying to do. Almost pointless. Quote Link to comment
BLEED4BLACKSHIRTS Posted February 18, 2012 Share Posted February 18, 2012 Different teams are going to place differently based on who they recruited. The rating doesn't seem to actually measure what it was trying to do. Almost pointless. +1 Quote Link to comment
Excel Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Screw how recruits are ranked..nobody improves upon talent like Wisconsin. 42 in recruiting, 12 in putting kids up for the draft. Quote Link to comment
HuskerFowler Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 and yet you still couldnt win the rose bowl Quote Link to comment
Treand3 Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 and yet you still couldnt win the rose bowl That's cold...I just want to make it there, been too long for a BCS bowl. Quote Link to comment
Excel Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 and yet you still couldnt win the rose bowl People in non-BCS houses shouldn't throw stones Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted February 20, 2012 Author Share Posted February 20, 2012 Wisconsin recruiting rank 42, and NFL draft rank 12? That's quite impressive. Really. Quote Link to comment
HuskerFowler Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 and yet you still couldnt win the rose bowl That's cold...I just want to make it there, been too long for a BCS bowl. I really hate Wisconsin, worse then Colorado, refuse to give them any recognition. Well see who makes more BCS bowls this decade. I put money on us even with them having a 2-0 lead. I will be shocked if they make it back in the next 8 years. Well start with 2010 and go til 2019 just to be fair. Quote Link to comment
Blaze1up Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Who was Iowas RB recruit ? Quote Link to comment
ADS Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 Who was Iowas RB recruit ? Greg Garmon. Quote Link to comment
Excel Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 and yet you still couldnt win the rose bowl That's cold...I just want to make it there, been too long for a BCS bowl. I really hate Wisconsin, worse then Colorado, refuse to give them any recognition. Well see who makes more BCS bowls this decade. I put money on us even with them having a 2-0 lead. I will be shocked if they make it back in the next 8 years. Well start with 2010 and go til 2019 just to be fair. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.