Saunders Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 Forest for the trees. More like ignore those trees over there. wjw Link to comment
sd'sker Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 Yeah, nobody believes Bachmann is getting out of politics. She'll need to lose an election before she's out of office, and so far the Minny voters have shown they'll keep electing her. You have these teflon representatives like Teddy Kennedy and Nancy Pelosi and Bachmann that get elected over and over by a group of idiotic constituents despite the harm they do, and then you get the country we have today. term limits would be nice, but then you have to expect congress to vote themselves out of office. also, you would have to be concerned about the influx of lobbyists. people just need to be more informed and realize we, the voters, have more similar interests than congress wants us to believe. Link to comment
Saunders Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 Yeah, nobody believes Bachmann is getting out of politics. She'll need to lose an election before she's out of office, and so far the Minny voters have shown they'll keep electing her. You have these teflon representatives like Teddy Kennedy and Nancy Pelosi and Bachmann that get elected over and over by a group of idiotic constituents despite the harm they do, and then you get the country we have today. And morons vote for people like this. There's a guy in our company who's practically in love with her. He's a racist, misogynistic, homophobe, and a complete tool. Of course, we also had a guy who literally thought Obama was gonna pay his mortgage too, so yeah. People are kinda dumb. Link to comment
Saunders Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 People are kinda dumb. See, we can agree! Link to comment
carlfense Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 See, we can agree! I've little doubt that overall we agree about a lot more than we disagree. Link to comment
Saunders Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 See, we can agree! I've little doubt that overall we agree about a lot more than we disagree. Not sure if I agree with that. Link to comment
sd'sker Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 See, we can agree! I've little doubt that overall we agree about a lot more than we disagree. Not sure if I agree with that. what if carlfense agrees with that? Link to comment
Saunders Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 See, we can agree! I've little doubt that overall we agree about a lot more than we disagree. Not sure if I agree with that. what if carlfense agrees with that? Then we'll agree to disagree... or disagree to agree??? Idk..... Link to comment
knapplc Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 what if carlfense agrees with that? Pretty sure they'd start talking about forests and trees again at that point. Link to comment
carlfense Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 See, we can agree! I've little doubt that overall we agree about a lot more than we disagree. Not sure if I agree with that. 1995 Huskers? Link to comment
carlfense Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 Pretty sure they'd start talking about forests and trees again at that point. Birch or fir? Link to comment
Saunders Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 See, we can agree! I've little doubt that overall we agree about a lot more than we disagree. Not sure if I agree with that. 1995 Huskers? 2001 Miami. nah................. Link to comment
Recommended Posts