Bowl Game Discussions

[Michiganball]

So anyone want to pick up the same blitz? anyone?

[HuskerShark]

Minnesota looked like they didn't even want to be playing this game. Absolutely stale and uninspired performance.

[Micheal]

dropped it

[Michiganball]

Oh man, he just had it go through he's arms.

[Micheal]

Now the odd bowl game where teams are on the same sideline

[Mavric]

Now the odd bowl game where teams are on the same sideline

Are they moving this game to the 49ers new stadium next year?

[NUance]

Syracus 21

Minnesota 17

 

Way to sh#t the bed, Golden Gerbils.

[Micheal]

Now the odd bowl game where teams are on the same sideline

Are they moving this game to the 49ers new stadium next year?

Unsure, would be a good move

[Mavric]

Now the odd bowl game where teams are on the same sideline

Are they moving this game to the 49ers new stadium next year?

Unsure, would be a good move

Apparently yes.

 

Beginning next year, when the game moves from AT&T Park to the new Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara, Cavalli anticipates an even better matchup.

 

The 2014 edition, which is expected to have a title sponsor and a new name, will be the first of six games pitting the Pac-12 Conference against the Big Ten Conference.

 

"We're calling it Rose Bowl North," Cavalli said.

 

Full Article

[Mavric]

Can someone please tell whoever is in charge of the ESPN Bottom Line that you can't be "expected to beat" someone "by an average of x points"? You can be "expected to beat" someone "by x points" or you can having projections showing someone "averaging to win by x points" but you can't win by an average.

 

[HuskerShark]

Can someone please tell whoever is in charge of the ESPN Bottom Line that you can't be "expected to beat" someone "by an average of x points"? You can be "expected to beat" someone "by x points" or you can having projections showing someone "averaging to win by x points" but you can't win by an average.

 

 

I assume you're talking about the Texas-Oregon matchup that has been scrolling through the ticker. I think it is saying that there are a bunch of predictions out there for a score, and the average prediction is that Oregon wins by 22.

[Mavric]

Can someone please tell whoever is in charge of the ESPN Bottom Line that you can't be "expected to beat" someone "by an average of x points"? You can be "expected to beat" someone "by x points" or you can having projections showing someone "averaging to win by x points" but you can't win by an average.

 

 

I assume you're talking about the Texas-Oregon matchup that has been scrolling through the ticker. I think it is saying that there are a bunch of predictions out there for a score, and the average prediction is that Oregon wins by 22.

Yeah, they have that for all the bowls. How you said it is correct. But you can't win by an average number of points.

[Mavric]

That was a pretty weak running into the kicker penalty against Rutgers - laying on his stomach two yards in front of where the ball was spotted and the kicker stumbles forward and trips over him. More like the kicker ran into him. Three free points for the Irish.

[Mavric]

So both incoming B1G members are going to lose and Minny pissed it away.

 

 

Not looking good.....

[Notre Dame Joe]

We won a bowl game and it was boring.