Commitment

[Saunders]

 

 

We have plenty of evidence to accurately judge Riley and staff. We certainly don't need 4-5 more years of this nonsense.

Really?? 5 games in with no chance to replenish the team with better talent. We have identified one cancer on the team in Lewis, is McMullen another? Locker room chemistry is very important and is the 408 holdovers are undermining the team, There is no fixing it until Riley can get rid of them.

Hey Mike, it's time to stop throwing the players under the bus.

 

First rule of leadership: Everything is your fault.

[Saunders]

 

 

 

 

It doesn't take 4-5 years, so we can stop with that fallacy. Coaches who finished in the top 25 last year matched or beat their predecessors record around 85% of the time.

With the same players? Against the same teams with those same players? I think we've found today's meaningless statistic. As it stands, the current time period that it takes to truly evaluate a hire is 3 years. That's enough time to get your players in your system. If we still see these same problems in Year 3, then it'd be time to move on.

 

For fun--and a little history lesson, take a look at Brian Kelly's time at Notre Dame.

It's not meaningless, but to deny that it doesn't have any meaning is burying your head in the sand. Look at Florida, Mac has that pitiful UF offense from the last 3 years producing when it counts. They owned the #3 team in the country last night.

[Scratchtown]

 

Jim McElwain....not taking him 4-5 years at Florida.

 

Urban Meyer....didn't take him 4-5 years at Ohio State.

 

I mean, Nebraska is one of those blue blood programs. It's time to quit giving the excuse that NU doesn't recruit...blah blah blah, hot beds, blah blah blah....

 

This staff SUCKS. 2-3? Loss to a 2 loss BYU, loss to Illinois, and a loss to freaking Miami team that we made look like a top 10 team, and they turn around and get beat by Cincy? By more than one possession?

 

Commitment? How bout the commitment the head effin coach gives the fans by not being a dipwad in playcalling.

 

Here is another thing that pisses me off. Coaches like MR and his staff are digging they're own grave. Coaches at that level know offense, and it doesn't matter what offense they run, they should know it and it's concepts and should be able to apply ANY offense they want. Yet, they still, despite what the fans WANT, what a legend said they need, run something that makes us pass 30-40 times a game.

 

Cool, thanks MR....

What happened to you?

 

Just watched the worst game I've ever seen as a Husker Fan.

[Bowfin]

Being committed to the coaching staff is being committed to the program. You can't have one without the other. Sorry, either your 100% in support or not not.

 

Untrue. One can have one without the other, and support isn't binary.

 

You are stating your opinion as some sort of immutable fact, and it's not.

 

I can like the behavior of certain players, certain coaches' and their coaching and not others, certain plays and not others, certain parts of the schedule and not others, certain uniforms and not others, and certain ADs and not others.

 

Where in the world did you come up with such a statement?

[huskerfan92]

 

It doesn't take 4-5 years, so we can stop with that fallacy. Coaches who finished in the top 25 last year matched or beat their predecessors record around 85% of the time.

 

With the same players? Against the same teams with those same players? I think we've found today's meaningless statistic. As it stands, the current time period that it takes to truly evaluate a hire is 3 years. That's enough time to get your players in your system. If we still see these same problems in Year 3, then it'd be time to move on.

 

For fun--and a little history lesson, take a look at Brian Kelly's time at Notre Dame.

 

 

Oh lord, Mike Riley is absolutely NOT Brian Kelly. Kelly took over a dumpster fire that Weis left him. We will still see these problems in year 3 because Riley has been this way in all his years of coaching. Oregon St. fans warned us about his terrible clock management, his teams having penalty problems, and Bankers defense. Wouldn't you know they've followed him here at Nebraska and they'll still be there in 3 years. #runtheball

[suh_fan93]

Being committed to the coaching staff is being committed to the program. You can't have one without the other. Sorry, either your 100% in support or not not.

 

Wrong.

[Bowfin]

Taken from another board, but I could not have said it better myself...". Judging from what I am reading here and elsewhere, our fan base doesn't have the commitment to remain supportive of a program..."

 

So you are saying your criticism of Pelini was a mistake?

[It'sNotAFakeID]

 

 

 

 

It doesn't take 4-5 years, so we can stop with that fallacy. Coaches who finished in the top 25 last year matched or beat their predecessors record around 85% of the time.

With the same players? Against the same teams with those same players? I think we've found today's meaningless statistic. As it stands, the current time period that it takes to truly evaluate a hire is 3 years. That's enough time to get your players in your system. If we still see these same problems in Year 3, then it'd be time to move on.

 

For fun--and a little history lesson, take a look at Brian Kelly's time at Notre Dame.

It's not meaningless, but to deny that it doesn't have any meaning is burying your head in the sand. Look at Florida, Mac has that pitiful UF offense from the last 3 years producing when it counts. They owned the #3 team in the country last night.

 

 

We could go back and forth about the whole...Florida was a talented team before Mac got their, they just had a pretty crappy coach. That's why it takes 3 years to truly evaluate a coach, until it's his talent that he's bringing in, this talent vs. coaching argument will continue to rear its ugly head. I'm not denying that the early going is less than average. I certainly expected a lot more than this and am incredibly worried going forward.

 

But I still don't think we have enough information to start calling for heads to roll. It's going to take patience.

[Lux]

Once you take a coaching change out of the options, one can begin to make productive criticisms and stop sounding like a child. Children go straight to firing the coaches. Do you go straight to firing someone? Well.. Then you're a child.

[GBRedneck]

 

We have plenty of evidence to accurately judge Riley and staff. We certainly don't need 4-5 more years of this nonsense.

Really?? 5 games in with no chance to replenish the team with better talent. We have identified one cancer on the team in Lewis, is McMullen another? Locker room chemistry is very important and is the 408 holdovers are undermining the team, There is no fixing it until Riley can get rid of them.

 

Have you looked at Riley's commits and offers? It's a mid-30s class. He's not doing any better at recruiting than 7x9+ AKA 408.

 

Talent is a weak excuse from every aspect. Very similar talent won 9-10 games per year the last 7. Using the talent excuse is just another way of throwing current players under the bus. So it fits right into Riley's wheelhouse, I guess.

[huskerfan92]

Once you take a coaching change out of the options, one can begin to make productive criticisms and stop sounding like a child. Children go straight to firing the coaches. Do you go straight to firing someone? Well.. Then you're a child.

 

Pretty sure a child could've called a better game than Langsdorf yesterday

[GBRedneck]

Once you take a coaching change out of the options, one can begin to make productive criticisms and stop sounding like a child. Children go straight to firing the coaches. Do you go straight to firing someone? Well.. Then you're a child.

 

I don't go straight to firing when I evaluate Riley. That's second. First, I go to "never should have been hired in the first place".

[Lux]

 

Once you take a coaching change out of the options, one can begin to make productive criticisms and stop sounding like a child. Children go straight to firing the coaches. Do you go straight to firing someone? Well.. Then you're a child.

 

I don't go straight to firing when I evaluate Riley. That's second. First, I go to "never should have been hired in the first place".

Once again, another child like statement. Im just saying. The original poster is right. Commit to the team and stop with the belly aching. We arnt firing anyone this year and unfortunately Riley was hired. Less childish statements would make for a better hiskerboard.

[Lux]

You act like the coaches spend unlimited time with these kids. This isn't the NFL bro. They are limited in every way and are just coming out of the starting blocks. They can barely decide who should do what and when let alone you expect them to be able to communicate with perfection game management. A child like expectation. Give it time.

[Scratchtown]

Once you take a coaching change out of the options, one can begin to make productive criticisms and stop sounding like a child. Children go straight to firing the coaches. Do you go straight to firing someone? Well.. Then you're a child.

You are the only one saying this. Doesn't mean you are right.

 

You aren't going to change the attitude of the board. Just stop.