Dear Husker Nation: Letter from OSU fan

[suh_fan93]

 

 

 

 

 

 

During the four years I went to OSU, we had 5 wins in total. That was before Riley. The fan who wrote the letter is obviously a younger fan who has no idea of OSU's football history. Riley turned it around and got close to 2 Rose Bowl appearances. That's a big deal for a school with a terrible history in football.

 

Thinking DONU has 10 win talent is delusional. The D is devoid of any talent except for the a few. Even our All World Safety can't tackle very well. On O, the line is terrible as are the backs. Newby goes down easier than a 2 dollar hooker.

 

Considering they won 9 games last year with many of the same guys it really isn't even close to being delusional.

 

Who do we have that is equivalent to Ameer?

Who do we have that is equivalent to Randy Gregory?

Who do we have that is equivalent to Kenny Bell?

Who do we have that is equivalent to Zaire Anderson?

 

 

Answers:

 

Who do we have that is equivalent to Ameer? No one was going to come in and do better than Ameer. We do have a player who's capable of making guys miss however but he's been riding pine all damn season.

Who do we have that is equivalent to Randy Gregory? Maliek Collins

Who do we have that is equivalent to Kenny Bell? Ever hear of a guy nicknamed Westerstache? He's made a few plays here and there. He's on the youtube if you're curious.

Who do we have that is equivalent to Zaire Anderson? Nate Gerry is still here. He was second on the team in tackles last year behind Anderson.

 

Enough with the excuses Rilievers....

 

 

Agreed, we have no one better than Ameer and for that matter DPE last year. (those two won us two games (arguably three) last year by themselves)

Maliek Collins was here last year, and doesn't even play the same position. My question still remains, who is equivalent to Randy Gregory.

Westercamp was here last year as well, Who do we have to replace Kenny's deep threat and blocking skills?

Nate Gerry doesn't play the same position as Zaire Anderson, and was obviously here last year as well.

 

So what you are saying is we are still good, because we replaced 4 MAJOR contributors with players that were already on the team last year? Ok, if you want to play that game. Who takes those guy's place then?

You can't take 22-4 and have it still equal 22 (no matter how hard you wish it to be true)

 

 

Here is the point and I'll make it by simply asking you a question.

 

Do you feel the loss of 2 players constitutes a rebuilding year????

 

It doesn't matter that we don't have the equivalent of a Randy Gregory at DE ready to fill his shoes this year because first off what team is going to re load like that? I listed Maliek Collins simply because you're implying that by losing Randy Gregory who else do we have left this year that is just as good? You're not going to have a guy step in a be 'as good' as Randy was at DE last year unless you catch lightening in a bottle. Were you really expecting that?

 

There are enough players from last years team that won 9 games to warrant having a far, far better record than this years 3-6 record but it's painfully obvious from your posts that this is the fact that you simply cannot and do not want to come to terms with......

 

 

It is so convenient for the Riley and Eichorst haters to just throw aside the fact that the talent as it exists right now on this team is not very good.

 

 

You keep saying that but I hate to be the one to break it to you brah but talent isn't the issue here. So you're just going to ignore the play calling? The personnel choices at running back and offensive line? The scheme? (Ex: Throwing almost 50 times with a hugely inexperienced QB against a Purdue team that has the #100th ranked rushing defense in the country...) No one can forget the simple clock management screw up that cost us the game at Illinois. Do you remember that? Heh. Of course you don't....

 

I'm sorry but all of those examples have zero to do with talent and everything to do with the coaches but you can keep blaming the players all you want since that's what's most convenient for the Riliever at this point which it's pretty obvious that's exactly what you are. The good thing is you'll probably only get to do that for another season or two because either Riley will retire or him and his staff along with Eichorst will just get the axe whichever comes first.

 

Maybe you could try to save their jobs after next year though by sending the new AD an e mail to let them know that 'hey man...it's the talent..."

 

I say go for it...

[Dansker]

Are injuries why we're throwing the ball 96 times against subar rush defenses?

I'm flabbergasted that Sipple or Chatelain didn't grill Riley with this question during today's presser. I would have and I would have asked why we continually shy away from running the football and being conservative, eating up clock, keep our defense off the field, give backup QB simple high percentage pass plays. What could have been a 31-10 game in our favor turned into a 55-45 technical KO loss by slinging it around as if we has Brady back there.

[KazLong]

 

Are injuries why we're throwing the ball 96 times against subar rush defenses?

I'm flabbergasted that Sipple or Chatelain didn't grill Riley with this question during today's presser. I would have and I would have asked why we continually shy away from running the football and being conservative, eating up clock, keep our defense off the field, give backup QB simple high percentage pass plays. What could have been a 31-10 game in our favor turned into a 55-45 technical KO loss by slinging it around as if we has Brady back there.

 

+1 to both.

[Hujan]

Oregon State fans have their own 2-6 season to worry about. It's no wonder some of them have taken to penning letters.

 

As for the "who cares if he's" -- what, professional? A guy who has his priorities straight? A guy we should be happy (at least from an off-field standpoint) is in charge of the student-athletes at UNL? ... disappointing opinions , but it comes with the territory of losing in a passionate environment. Agree to disagree.

 

Nebraska class is a huge source of pride for me. I have only very tangential ties to the university or the state, but that feeling that it's a special place with special people is why it is always my favorite program to follow.

 

Riley does not have a monopoly on professionalism, just as Bo did not have a monopoly on winning at least 9 games a year.

[teachercd]

 

 

 

 

 

 

During the four years I went to OSU, we had 5 wins in total. That was before Riley. The fan who wrote the letter is obviously a younger fan who has no idea of OSU's football history. Riley turned it around and got close to 2 Rose Bowl appearances. That's a big deal for a school with a terrible history in football.

 

Thinking DONU has 10 win talent is delusional. The D is devoid of any talent except for the a few. Even our All World Safety can't tackle very well. On O, the line is terrible as are the backs. Newby goes down easier than a 2 dollar hooker.

 

Considering they won 9 games last year with many of the same guys it really isn't even close to being delusional.

Who do we have that is equivalent to Ameer?

Who do we have that is equivalent to Randy Gregory?

Who do we have that is equivalent to Kenny Bell?

Who do we have that is equivalent to Zaire Anderson?

Answers:

 

Who do we have that is equivalent to Ameer? No one was going to come in and do better than Ameer. We do have a player who's capable of making guys miss however but he's been riding pine all damn season.

Who do we have that is equivalent to Randy Gregory? Maliek Collins

Who do we have that is equivalent to Kenny Bell? Ever hear of a guy nicknamed Westerstache? He's made a few plays here and there. He's on the youtube if you're curious.

Who do we have that is equivalent to Zaire Anderson? Nate Gerry is still here. He was second on the team in tackles last year behind Anderson.

 

Enough with the excuses Rilievers....

Agreed, we have no one better than Ameer and for that matter DPE last year. (those two won us two games (arguably three) last year by themselves)

Maliek Collins was here last year, and doesn't even play the same position. My question still remains, who is equivalent to Randy Gregory.

Westercamp was here last year as well, Who do we have to replace Kenny's deep threat and blocking skills?

Nate Gerry doesn't play the same position as Zaire Anderson, and was obviously here last year as well.

 

So what you are saying is we are still good, because we replaced 4 MAJOR contributors with players that were already on the team last year? Ok, if you want to play that game. Who takes those guy's place then?

You can't take 22-4 and have it still equal 22 (no matter how hard you wish it to be true)

Here is the point and I'll make it by simply asking you a question.

 

Do you feel the loss of 2 players constitutes a rebuilding year????

 

It doesn't matter that we don't have the equivalent of a Randy Gregory at DE ready to fill his shoes this year because first off what team is going to re load like that? I listed Maliek Collins simply because you're implying that by losing Randy Gregory who else do we have left this year that is just as good? You're not going to have a guy step in a be 'as good' as Randy was at DE last year unless you catch lightening in a bottle. Were you really expecting that?

 

There are enough players from last years team that won 9 games to warrant having a far, far better record than this years 3-6 record but it's painfully obvious from your posts that this is the fact that you simply cannot and do not want to come to terms with......

That argument is the equivalent of saying "Well if you take away the three 80 yard TD runs, the RB didn't do squat"

 

This masterful team that won 9 games last year would have directly only one 7 games without those two players, possibly only 6. If we were 6-7 last year, would 3-6 this year be unexpected?

 

So, yes this team with all of the dysfunction left by the previous staff, the change in schemes, the loss of 4-5 playmakers and no one to replace them, is not going to be very good.

 

It is so convenient for the Riley and Eichorst haters to just throw aside the fact that the talent as it exists right now on this team is not very good. The 247 composite rankings for the starters for the Purdue game was actually less than that of Purdue. That is including Newby and DPE whom were gone after the first qtr.

 

The facts do not lie, Nebraska is at the talent level TODAY of Purdue. But go ahead and keep wishing and hoping that Nebraska will win games just because they are Nebraska and kids will pee their pants when they show up.

They beat Purdue without AA last year...maybe without KB and RG too

[ArcticHusker]

During the four years I went to OSU, we had 5 wins in total. That was before Riley. The fan who wrote the letter is obviously a younger fan who has no idea of OSU's football history. Riley turned it around and got close to 2 Rose Bowl appearances. That's a big deal for a school with a terrible history in football.

 

Thinking DONU has 10 win talent is delusional. The D is devoid of any talent except for the a few. Even our All World Safety can't tackle very well. On O, the line is terrible as are the backs. Newby goes down easier than a 2 dollar hooker.

 

 

Don't you talk about Nate Gerry that way!

[gdubs4nu]

 

During the four years I went to OSU, we had 5 wins in total. That was before Riley. The fan who wrote the letter is obviously a younger fan who has no idea of OSU's football history. Riley turned it around and got close to 2 Rose Bowl appearances. That's a big deal for a school with a terrible history in football.

 

Thinking DONU has 10 win talent is delusional. The D is devoid of any talent except for the a few. Even our All World Safety can't tackle very well. On O, the line is terrible as are the backs. Newby goes down easier than a 2 dollar hooker.

 

Considering they won 9 games last year with many of the same guys it really isn't even close to being delusional.

 

They'd be the same guys if Ameer, Kenny Bell, Josh Mitchell, and Randy Gregory was on the team. They're not and all four of those players had a massive impact and won games single handidly keeping Nebraska from a 6-6 record last year.

[cm husker]

NU wins 9 or 10 games for 7 straight years, each year finding a player who stepped up and served the role of major playmaker sometimes out of the blue.

 

But now, all of a sudden, NU doesn't have the talent to win 9 or 10 games against arguably the worst schedule they've faced since the mid 2000s.

 

It defies all explanation except that people will tell themselves anything to convince themselves they weren't wrong.

[cm husker]

 

 

 

 

 

 

During the four years I went to OSU, we had 5 wins in total. That was before Riley. The fan who wrote the letter is obviously a younger fan who has no idea of OSU's football history. Riley turned it around and got close to 2 Rose Bowl appearances. That's a big deal for a school with a terrible history in football.

 

Thinking DONU has 10 win talent is delusional. The D is devoid of any talent except for the a few. Even our All World Safety can't tackle very well. On O, the line is terrible as are the backs. Newby goes down easier than a 2 dollar hooker.

 

Considering they won 9 games last year with many of the same guys it really isn't even close to being delusional.

 

Who do we have that is equivalent to Ameer?

Who do we have that is equivalent to Randy Gregory?

Who do we have that is equivalent to Kenny Bell?

Who do we have that is equivalent to Zaire Anderson?

 

 

Answers:

 

Who do we have that is equivalent to Ameer? No one was going to come in and do better than Ameer. We do have a player who's capable of making guys miss however but he's been riding pine all damn season.

Who do we have that is equivalent to Randy Gregory? Maliek Collins

Who do we have that is equivalent to Kenny Bell? Ever hear of a guy nicknamed Westerstache? He's made a few plays here and there. He's on the youtube if you're curious.

Who do we have that is equivalent to Zaire Anderson? Nate Gerry is still here. He was second on the team in tackles last year behind Anderson.

 

Enough with the excuses Rilievers....

 

 

Agreed, we have no one better than Ameer and for that matter DPE last year. (those two won us two games (arguably three) last year by themselves)

Maliek Collins was here last year, and doesn't even play the same position. My question still remains, who is equivalent to Randy Gregory.

Westercamp was here last year as well, Who do we have to replace Kenny's deep threat and blocking skills?

Nate Gerry doesn't play the same position as Zaire Anderson, and was obviously here last year as well.

 

So what you are saying is we are still good, because we replaced 4 MAJOR contributors with players that were already on the team last year? Ok, if you want to play that game. Who takes those guy's place then?

You can't take 22-4 and have it still equal 22 (no matter how hard you wish it to be true)

 

 

Here is the point and I'll make it by simply asking you a question.

 

Do you feel the loss of 2 players constitutes a rebuilding year????

 

It doesn't matter that we don't have the equivalent of a Randy Gregory at DE ready to fill his shoes this year because first off what team is going to re load like that? I listed Maliek Collins simply because you're implying that by losing Randy Gregory who else do we have left this year that is just as good? You're not going to have a guy step in a be 'as good' as Randy was at DE last year unless you catch lightening in a bottle. Were you really expecting that?

 

There are enough players from last years team that won 9 games to warrant having a far, far better record than this years 3-6 record but it's painfully obvious from your posts that this is the fact that you simply cannot and do not want to come to terms with......

 

That argument is the equivalent of saying "Well if you take away the three 80 yard TD runs, the RB didn't do squat"

 

This masterful team that won 9 games last year would have directly only one 7 games without those two players, possibly only 6. If we were 6-7 last year, would 3-6 this year be unexpected?

 

So, yes this team with all of the dysfunction left by the previous staff, the change in schemes, the loss of 4-5 playmakers and no one to replace them, is not going to be very good.

 

It is so convenient for the Riley and Eichorst haters to just throw aside the fact that the talent as it exists right now on this team is not very good. The 247 composite rankings for the starters for the Purdue game was actually less than that of Purdue. That is including Newby and DPE whom were gone after the first qtr.

 

The facts do not lie, Nebraska is at the talent level TODAY of Purdue. But go ahead and keep wishing and hoping that Nebraska will win games just because they are Nebraska and kids will pee their pants when they show up.

 

 

It's convenient, because it's a lie, or at least utterly inaccurate. It's already been debunked. Stopper trying to perpetuate the lie.

[Joe_5700]

 

Like 25%+ of our contributing roster is walk-ons.

 

 

I'm not saying we have the talent of a 3-5 team by any means, but a cakewalk to 9 wins this season was not ever going to be. Illinois is a better team than last year, Miami is arguably the same or better, BYU is a better opponent than Macneese State or whoever, Southern Miss is much improved this year, Wisconsin is about on par, Minnesota is slightly down, Iowa is significantly better, MSU is still elite, Northwestern is notably better, Purdue is, believe it or not, quite a bit better than last year as well.

You can twist that any way you want. 3-6 is still 3-6 at the end of the day. And if you want to say Purdue is better because they beat a terrible Nebraska team, then good for you.

 

Also Wisconsin was far better last year. No Gordon, and no Clement when they played us last...

[Joe_5700]

NU wins 9 or 10 games for 7 straight years, each year finding a player who stepped up and served the role of major playmaker sometimes out of the blue.

 

But now, all of a sudden, NU doesn't have the talent to win 9 or 10 games against arguably the worst schedule they've faced since the mid 2000s.

 

It defies all explanation except that people will tell themselves anything to convince themselves they weren't wrong.

^This times 1000

[Dagerow]

NU wins 9 or 10 games for 7 straight years, each year finding a player who stepped up and served the role of major playmaker sometimes out of the blue.

 

But now, all of a sudden, NU doesn't have the talent to win 9 or 10 games against arguably the worst schedule they've faced since the mid 2000s.

 

It defies all explanation except that people will tell themselves anything to convince themselves they weren't wrong.

Solid post

[Harriedhusker]

I think it is unrealistic to expect the AD to fire Riley after one season. Eichorst would have to be fired first.

I do not believe if Riley were to be fired after one year that it would paint the Husker program as toxic or keep really good coaches at bay. A really good coach demands a compensation package in the $5 mill range. We would have to decide if we want to spend that kind of money. If we did, we could find a coach, regardless of how long M R lasts.

On a closing note, the Miami Hurricanes just fired their coach.. Golden.. He was an Eichorst hire I think

[NUinID]

I think it is unrealistic to expect the AD to fire Riley after one season. Eichorst would have to be fired first.

I do not believe if Riley were to be fired after one year that it would paint the Husker program as toxic or keep really good coaches at bay. A really good coach demands a compensation package in the $5 mill range. We would have to decide if we want to spend that kind of money. If we did, we could find a coach, regardless of how long M R lasts.

On a closing note, the Miami Hurricanes just fired their coach.. Golden.. He was an Eichorst hire I think

 

No he wasn't SE inherited him. I am with Mr. Chamberlain NU has top 30 talent right now. Injuries have hurt no doubt, but that doesn't excuse losses to Purdue and Illinois.

 

CM I disagree that this is a terrible schedule. BYU is going to win 9 and maybe 10 games this year, Whisky sit at 6-2 with its 2 losses to Alabama and Iowa. NW is 6-2 with wins over Stanford and Duke. S. Miss is actually 6-3 right now I think and could win out. Plus we still have to play Iowa and MSU. Coming into the season the schedule looked fairly easy, but NU has played some good teams so far. Not a extremely tough schedule but better than a lot of teams. This schedule is tougher than last years by far.

[brophog]

 

I think it is unrealistic to expect the AD to fire Riley after one season. Eichorst would have to be fired first.

I do not believe if Riley were to be fired after one year that it would paint the Husker program as toxic or keep really good coaches at bay. A really good coach demands a compensation package in the $5 mill range. We would have to decide if we want to spend that kind of money. If we did, we could find a coach, regardless of how long M R lasts.

On a closing note, the Miami Hurricanes just fired their coach.. Golden.. He was an Eichorst hire I think

 

No he wasn't SE inherited him. I am with Mr. Chamberlain NU has top 30 talent right now. Injuries have hurt no doubt, but that doesn't excuse losses to Purdue and Illinois.

 

CM I disagree that this is a terrible schedule. BYU is going to win 9 and maybe 10 games this year, Whisky sit at 6-2 with its 2 losses to Alabama and Iowa. NW is 6-2 with wins over Stanford and Duke. S. Miss is actually 6-3 right now I think and could win out. Plus we still have to play Iowa and MSU. Coming into the season the schedule looked fairly easy, but NU has played some good teams so far. Not a extremely tough schedule but better than a lot of teams. This schedule is tougher than last years by far.

Generally good teams can atleast break the top 50 in total offense. Except none of our opponents can, save for Southern Miss.

 

Put it another way, if these are all such good teams, where are their good victories? Northwestern has some good wins, but they're balanced by some greatly lopsided losses (and all you need to do is put the tape on to see that is not a good football team). Neither BYU nor Wisconsin has a win against a current top 25 team. Iowa currently doesn't, though Pitt and/or Wisconsin could slide into the rankings.

 

How then can you have a schedule of good teams if they're not ranked, they don't beat ranked teams, and all of them have weak offenses? I'm truly baffled how anyone can say this is a schedule of good teams with any kind of honesty.