Ryker Fyfe

[KazLong]

I'd vote for Ryker Fyfe for president while we are in fantasy mode.

[TITANIC VS LUSITANIA]

Trollster

[adc7236]

 

I sooooo hope that a new stat gets recorded next year...

 

Real Ints

 

What other ones could we have?

I really don't care if Fyfe plays or not. That being said, if we're going to be critical of a kid that has no PT, I think it is ok to be fair.

 

I dont recall the exact situation but I believe one ball was money and was tipped to Purdue (Reilly Maybe) and I think the other was either a receiver that fell or a route communication.

 

I am with you. Not all those INTs were on Fyfe, despite what the record books say. I thought he showed promise for the amount of playing time he has had.

[theknife]

Ryker Fyfe is the answer. Armstrong is not.

#science

[gobiggergoredder]

he's a D-2 recruited walk on, when he gets here, O'Brien gets the nod before this kid.

Oregon is starting an FCS kid.

[Redux]

I freaking hate the whole "that pick wasn't the QB's fault BS. Novody keeps track of the receiver running the wrong route, they tally up how many times the QB throws the ball to the other team though regardless of why it got caught. Tommy has begun to excel at that.

 

Ryker Fyfe is not even freaking close to the answer. He is barely the answer at being the back up. This thread is completely stupid.

[huskers15]

I don't give a sh#t about D-2, FCS, 4 star, 5 star or a walk on. You either got "it" or you don't. You can't tell me that some rating system knows what's in an 18 yo's genes. It's all a bunch of garbage. Those of you that believe that crap, just follow the money trail.

[huskers15]

I freaking hate the whole "that pick wasn't the QB's fault BS. Novody keeps track of the receiver running the wrong route, they tally up how many times the QB throws the ball to the other team though regardless of why it got caught. Tommy has begun to excel at that.

 

Ryker Fyfe is not even freaking close to the answer. He is barely the answer at being the back up. This thread is completely stupid.

Again, go back and watch the Purdue game.

[Redux]

I don't give a sh#t about D-2, FCS, 4 star, 5 star or a walk on. You either got "it" or you don't.

And Fyfe don't.

[Redux]

 

I freaking hate the whole "that pick wasn't the QB's fault BS. Novody keeps track of the receiver running the wrong route, they tally up how many times the QB throws the ball to the other team though regardless of why it got caught. Tommy has begun to excel at that.Ryker Fyfe is not even freaking close to the answer. He is barely the answer at being the back up. This thread is completely stupid.

 

Again, go back and watch the Purdue game.

Why? To see our defense suck? To see Fyfe STRUGGLE AGAINST FREAKING PURDUE???????

 

You are going to convince nobody. Drop it.

 

Seriously, where are these people coming from?

[huskers15]

 

I don't give a sh#t about D-2, FCS, 4 star, 5 star or a walk on. You either got "it" or you don't.

And Fyfe don't.

 

Whatever.

[gobiggergoredder]

I freaking hate the whole "that pick wasn't the QB's fault BS. Novody keeps track of the receiver running the wrong route, they tally up how many times the QB throws the ball to the other team though regardless of why it got caught. Tommy has begun to excel at that.

Ryker Fyfe is not even freaking close to the answer. He is barely the answer at being the back up. This thread is completely stupid.

No one keeps track of the baller plays the Reilly and Westy have made on certain picks either.

 

It's a message board where we all have opinions. When you are contending for the national lead in INTs, it seems as appropriate of a topic as the 15 fire Riley threads.

[Redux]

 

I freaking hate the whole "that pick wasn't the QB's fault BS. Novody keeps track of the receiver running the wrong route, they tally up how many times the QB throws the ball to the other team though regardless of why it got caught. Tommy has begun to excel at that.

Ryker Fyfe is not even freaking close to the answer. He is barely the answer at being the back up. This thread is completely stupid.

No one keeps track of the baller plays the Reilly and Westy have made on certain picks either.

It's a message board where we all have opinions. When you are contending for the national lead in INTs, it seems as appropriate of a topic as the 15 fire Riley threads.

Those are also completely stupid.

[ColoradoHusk]

 

 

I sooooo hope that a new stat gets recorded next year...

 

Real Ints

 

What other ones could we have?

I really don't care if Fyfe plays or not. That being said, if we're going to be critical of a kid that has no PT, I think it is ok to be fair.

 

I dont recall the exact situation but I believe one ball was money and was tipped to Purdue (Reilly Maybe) and I think the other was either a receiver that fell or a route communication.

 

I am with you. Not all those INTs were on Fyfe, despite what the record books say. I thought he showed promise for the amount of playing time he has had.

 

Of course, none of the INT's are on Langsdorf either. I am sure we can petition to get them added to Armstrong's total, since he was at home watching the game from his couch.

[adc7236]

I freaking hate the whole "that pick wasn't the QB's fault BS. Novody keeps track of the receiver running the wrong route, they tally up how many times the QB throws the ball to the other team though regardless of why it got caught. Tommy has begun to excel at that.

 

Ryker Fyfe is not even freaking close to the answer. He is barely the answer at being the back up. This thread is completely stupid.

I thought you left this thread.