BigRedBuster Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 2 minutes ago, ActualCornHusker said: The point being, a Clinton white house would have been exponentially worse than we have currently. No....just no. and, no....this doesn’t mean I’m a democrat. 5 1 Link to comment
ActualCornHusker Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said: So, you haven’t had a problem with his kids ( who have no official capacity nor security clearance) sitting in on official meetings with foreign leaders that they have businesses the country of or are trying to open ones. What other president has had family members who don’t hold official titles and security clearance representing the US? To begin with a disclaimer, I don't like it either but here's my question: What other president has had children or in-laws with the competence (arguable i know) to be able to handle a position like that? Is that better or worse than having your cabinet picked by Citi Bank? Just now, Nebfanatic said: When was the last time we had a president try and hold an international government event at his private resort? Similar question: what other president has owned his own resort? Again, not sure if I like it, but if he were to offer it up at no expense to the taxpayer, would you be against it? Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 4 minutes ago, ActualCornHusker said: Actually it was in response to the idea that the Dem party is "on the right side of history" I never said that. Link to comment
ActualCornHusker Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 2 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: No....just no. and, no....this doesn’t mean I’m a democrat. I know you're not... I'm similar to you that i am fiscally conservative but don't like the GOP. Im just not quite as appalled by Trump as you are 1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said: I never said that. Not you, Zrod said that Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 1 minute ago, ActualCornHusker said: o begin with a disclaimer, I don't like it either but here's my question: What other president has had children or in-laws with the competence (arguable i know) to be able to handle a position like that? You have got to be kidding. what credentials do they have to do any of this? NONE. ......zilch. 1 Link to comment
ActualCornHusker Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 Just now, BigRedBuster said: You have got to be kidding. what credentials do they have to do any of this? NONE. ......zilch. Depends what you mean by credentials. If you'd rather have a lifelong politician or bureaucrat in charge of these positions, we're VERY far apart Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 1 minute ago, ActualCornHusker said: know you're not... I'm similar to you that i am fiscally conservative but don't like the GOP. Im just not quite as appalled by Trump as you are So....you’re ok with him tearing our intelligence community apart in favor of believing whatever Putin tells him. you’re in favor of him blatantly going against the law in the US by actively inviting a foreign government to meddle in our elections for his own benefit. 1 Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 4 minutes ago, ActualCornHusker said: Similar question: what other president has owned his own resort? Again, not sure if I like it, but if he were to offer it up at no expense to the taxpayer, would you be against it? None and thats the problem. He should have divested and should be impeached for that alone. To the bolded, fat chance. 4 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 1 minute ago, ActualCornHusker said: Depends what you mean by credentials. If you'd rather have a lifelong politician or bureaucrat in charge of these positions, we're VERY far apart I ask you what credentials they have. Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 And.....they are doing this while making personal business deals fir themselves and Trump. 1 Link to comment
ActualCornHusker Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 Just now, BigRedBuster said: And.....they are doing this while making personal business deals fir themselves and Trump. Do you have evidence of this, or is it an assumption since they're in those roles? Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 Why do so many people leave the White House staff criticizing him and his actions? Just now, ActualCornHusker said: Do you have evidence of this, or is it an assumption since they're in those roles? it’s been discussed if you’ve been paying attention. Link to comment
ActualCornHusker Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said: Why do so many people leave the White House staff criticizing him and his actions? it’s been discussed if you’ve been paying attention. Not sure how far back... I'm relatively new here Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 I'm sorry but if Trump trying to hold G-7 at Mar-a-lago isn't the most blatent attempt at self enrichment via political office ever I'm not sure what is. 2 Link to comment
ActualCornHusker Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 37 minutes ago, BlitzFirst said: https://www.forbes.com/sites/chasewithorn/2019/06/14/jared-kushner-and-ivanka-trump-made-at-least-28-million-last-year/#111e6e6041e0 https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/01/politics/ivanka-trump-fbi-investigation/index.html https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-10-10/trumps-adult-children-do-business-overseas-as-president-slams-biden https://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-pol-ivanka-trump-jared-kushner-income-20190614-story.html https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/07/02/ivanka-trump-jared-kushner-displace-real-diplomats-japan-north-korea-column/1626308001/ https://www.gq.com/story/kushner-company-flooded-with-money This was 2 minutes of google searching. These are all news sources that published these findings. IF THESE FINDINGS WERE WRONG, IT WOULD BE LIBEL. They would be sued if it was untrue and they would lose and be forced to admit they lied. That hasn't happened. The fact that the publications are still able to have these articles published lends to their credibility. I skimmed them. The optics are not good. But it takes more than optics to prove actual wrongdoing... Link to comment
Recommended Posts