Hillary Clinton lies...

[AFhusker]

Double Post

[Moiraine]

 

 

 

 

A lot of times when I read about Clinton and the email stuff I remember she's about the same age as my mom. My mom runs a successful business and she knows nothing about computers or technology. The difference is Clinton probably has a huge ego and didn't think it was necessary to listen to the people who know what they're talking about when it comes to this stuff.

 

And before the "so why vote for her" people chime in, Trump would be even worse in my opinion. I can't imagine him having anyone but Yes Men around him.

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted!

 

To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her?

Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it.

 

My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that.

The difference is that Hillary is mandated to take training on the classifications of info on a yearly basis just like the rest of us government employees do. We also get training on how to use every program that is needed to do our job. All of the excuses she is using is bogus, especially for someone who has worked in Government for 20-30 years. I believe that is the difference between Hillary and your mother.

 

I would also watch the "reading comprehension" comment because if you remember I was banned for a month for using the same comment. Maybe it won't matter since you favor the left as most of the mods do on here, but I don't want you to get banned for something as silly as I did with no warning. I also wanted to thank you for standing up for me when I was banned. I really appreciated it as it goes to show that even though we may disagree on some topics on here, it shouldn't be personal.

First paragraph is sort of related to what I said about Clinton not listening/caring what the people who know about it are saying.

[Moiraine]

 

 

 

 

A lot of times when I read about Clinton and the email stuff I remember she's about the same age as my mom. My mom runs a successful business and she knows nothing about computers or technology. The difference is Clinton probably has a huge ego and didn't think it was necessary to listen to the people who know what they're talking about when it comes to this stuff.

 

And before the "so why vote for her" people chime in, Trump would be even worse in my opinion. I can't imagine him having anyone but Yes Men around him.

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted!

 

To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her?

Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it.

 

My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that.

 

lol, show me what line you consider "criticizing her", because the way I read it, you were making excuses because your mom is a successful business woman, who is about the same age as Hillary and she doesn't know anything about computers or technology, either... see the correlation?

 

That statement pretty much fits, from what I have seen, your stance on Hillary... and your stance on Trump.

 

If I remember correctly, you complained about me being abrasive with my early posts, so why the first line? Don't you follow your own advice, or are you a do as I say, not as I do person?

Again, please read what I posted

 

How do you come away from THIS line, which was the entire point of my post, not understanding that I was criticizing her and thinking I was making an excuse???

 

 

The difference is Clinton probably has a huge ego and didn't think it was necessary to listen to the people who know what they're talking about when it comes to this stuff.

 

How do you not understand it's criticism??? I said Clinton has a huge ego. I said she ignored the experts who understand something she's ignorant on.

 

It's so confusing to me that you took it as anything but criticism that I had no other option than to make the reading comprehension comment.

 

And again with my mom, I'm saying she knows she doesn't know about computers but she would listen to the people who do know about them. But Clinton has a big ego and didn't listen. The whole point of the comparison is that lots of old people are totally ignorant on computers/internet so it's likely Clinton is too but it doesn't mean she's not capable of doing the job... As long as she doesn't ignore people like she did about the emails. I'M SAYING IT WAS STUPID.

 

Why am I trying to explain this for a third time?

 

Do I have to use fantastical words line "Clinton's such a dumb dumb like all those other libs for not listening to people who know what they're doing?"

 

I just don't get it. Let me try a 4th time.

 

 

Clinton probably ignored advice on internet security because she's an idiot who didn't think their advice was necessary. This is what I was saying in the original post, and the 2nd post, and the first part of this third post.

[huskerfan2000]

 

 

 

 

A lot of times when I read about Clinton and the email stuff I remember she's about the same age as my mom. My mom runs a successful business and she knows nothing about computers or technology. The difference is Clinton probably has a huge ego and didn't think it was necessary to listen to the people who know what they're talking about when it comes to this stuff.

 

And before the "so why vote for her" people chime in, Trump would be even worse in my opinion. I can't imagine him having anyone but Yes Men around him.

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted!

 

To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her?

Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it.

 

My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that.

 

lol, show me what line you consider "criticizing her", because the way I read it, you were making excuses because your mom is a successful business woman, who is about the same age as Hillary and she doesn't know anything about computers or technology, either... see the correlation?

 

That statement pretty much fits, from what I have seen, your stance on Hillary... and your stance on Trump.

 

If I remember correctly, you complained about me being abrasive with my early posts, so why the first line? Don't you follow your own advice, or are you a do as I say, not as I do person?

Again, please read what I posted

 

How do you come away from THIS line, which was the entire point of my post, not understanding that I was criticizing her and thinking I was making an excuse???

 

 

The difference is Clinton probably has a huge ego and didn't think it was necessary to listen to the people who know what they're talking about when it comes to this stuff.

 

How do you not understand it's criticism??? I said Clinton has a huge ego. I said she ignored the experts who understand something she's ignorant on.

 

It's so confusing to me that you took it as anything but criticism that I had no other option than to make the reading comprehension comment.

 

And again with my mom, I'm saying she knows she doesn't know about computers but she would listen to the people who do know about them. But Clinton has a big ego and didn't listen. The whole point of the comparison is that lots of old people are totally ignorant on computers/internet so it's likely Clinton is too but it doesn't mean she's not capable of doing the job... As long as she doesn't ignore people like she did about the emails. I'M SAYING IT WAS STUPID.

 

Why am I trying to explain this for a third time?

 

Do I have to use fantastical words line "Clinton's such a dumb dumb like all those other libs for not listening to people who know what they're doing?"

 

I just don't get it. Let me try a 4th time.

 

 

Clinton probably ignored advice on internet security because she's an idiot who didn't think their advice was necessary. This is what I was saying in the original post, and the 2nd post, and the first part of this third post.

 

 

Well, I stepped in pretty good. I don't know how the hell I skimmed over that, pretty important line.. twice! I would try to blame it on all the games, but that doesn't explain my post a little bit ago.. geez, maybe I should be more careful reading "everything".

 

My fault and my apologizes!

[Moiraine]

 

 

 

 

 

A lot of times when I read about Clinton and the email stuff I remember she's about the same age as my mom. My mom runs a successful business and she knows nothing about computers or technology. The difference is Clinton probably has a huge ego and didn't think it was necessary to listen to the people who know what they're talking about when it comes to this stuff.

 

And before the "so why vote for her" people chime in, Trump would be even worse in my opinion. I can't imagine him having anyone but Yes Men around him.

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted!

 

To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her?

Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it.

 

My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that.

 

lol, show me what line you consider "criticizing her", because the way I read it, you were making excuses because your mom is a successful business woman, who is about the same age as Hillary and she doesn't know anything about computers or technology, either... see the correlation?

 

That statement pretty much fits, from what I have seen, your stance on Hillary... and your stance on Trump.

 

If I remember correctly, you complained about me being abrasive with my early posts, so why the first line? Don't you follow your own advice, or are you a do as I say, not as I do person?

Again, please read what I posted

 

How do you come away from THIS line, which was the entire point of my post, not understanding that I was criticizing her and thinking I was making an excuse???

 

 

The difference is Clinton probably has a huge ego and didn't think it was necessary to listen to the people who know what they're talking about when it comes to this stuff.

 

How do you not understand it's criticism??? I said Clinton has a huge ego. I said she ignored the experts who understand something she's ignorant on.

 

It's so confusing to me that you took it as anything but criticism that I had no other option than to make the reading comprehension comment.

 

And again with my mom, I'm saying she knows she doesn't know about computers but she would listen to the people who do know about them. But Clinton has a big ego and didn't listen. The whole point of the comparison is that lots of old people are totally ignorant on computers/internet so it's likely Clinton is too but it doesn't mean she's not capable of doing the job... As long as she doesn't ignore people like she did about the emails. I'M SAYING IT WAS STUPID.

 

Why am I trying to explain this for a third time?

 

Do I have to use fantastical words line "Clinton's such a dumb dumb like all those other libs for not listening to people who know what they're doing?"

 

I just don't get it. Let me try a 4th time.

 

 

Clinton probably ignored advice on internet security because she's an idiot who didn't think their advice was necessary. This is what I was saying in the original post, and the 2nd post, and the first part of this third post.

Well, I stepped in pretty good. I don't know how the hell I skimmed over that, pretty important line.. twice! I would try to blame it on all the games, but that doesn't explain my post a little bit ago.. geez, maybe I should be more careful reading "everything".

 

My fault and my apologizes!

No worries. And I'm sorry for the "dumb dumb... libs" comment but I was going crazy, heh.

[AFhusker]

 

 

 

 

A lot of times when I read about Clinton and the email stuff I remember she's about the same age as my mom. My mom runs a successful business and she knows nothing about computers or technology. The difference is Clinton probably has a huge ego and didn't think it was necessary to listen to the people who know what they're talking about when it comes to this stuff.

 

And before the "so why vote for her" people chime in, Trump would be even worse in my opinion. I can't imagine him having anyone but Yes Men around him.

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted!

 

To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her?

Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it.

 

My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that.

The difference is that Hillary is mandated to take training on the classifications of info on a yearly basis just like the rest of us government employees do. We also get training on how to use every program that is needed to do our job. All of the excuses she is using is bogus, especially for someone who has worked in Government for 20-30 years. I believe that is the difference between Hillary and your mother.

 

I would also watch the "reading comprehension" comment because if you remember I was banned for a month for using the same comment. Maybe it won't matter since you favor the left as most of the mods do on here, but I don't want you to get banned for something as silly as I did with no warning. I also wanted to thank you for standing up for me when I was banned. I really appreciated it as it goes to show that even though we may disagree on some topics on here, it shouldn't be personal.

First paragraph is sort of related to what I said about Clinton not listening/caring what the people who know about it are saying.

 

She has to be the one who passes that training, it is based off of your ID card and the system won't let you on without you being up to date on the training. So that is how everyone knows that she is full of sh#t when she claims that she didn't know. It is oblivious that she doesn't listen or care because she believes that she is above the rules. And with the result of the crooked AG/Obama Administration that she is correct, she is above the law of common people.

[BigRedBuster]

hmmmm.....so, a large corporation from Germany can come in and thumb their noses at our laws and purposely break them and we are supposed to feel sorry for them because of our horrible regulations.

 

But...those horrible Mexicans who have been here for years being productive members of society....get the mother f'ers out of here. Those horrible criminals have got to go.

 

But...again. Don't punish that poor poor company VW that just got caught up in our out of control regulation.

[Moiraine]

hmmmm.....so, a large corporation from Germany can come in and thumb their noses at our laws and purposely break them and we are supposed to feel sorry for them because of our horrible regulations.

 

But...those horrible Mexicans who have been here for years being productive members of society....get the mother f'ers out of here. Those horrible criminals have got to go.

 

But...again. Don't punish that poor poor company VW that just got caught up in our out of control regulation.

The Germans look like us

[huskerfan2000]

 

 

 

 

 

 

A lot of times when I read about Clinton and the email stuff I remember she's about the same age as my mom. My mom runs a successful business and she knows nothing about computers or technology. The difference is Clinton probably has a huge ego and didn't think it was necessary to listen to the people who know what they're talking about when it comes to this stuff.

 

And before the "so why vote for her" people chime in, Trump would be even worse in my opinion. I can't imagine him having anyone but Yes Men around him.

lol, being SOS and running a business are totally different, and on a grand scale. Spin noted!

 

To the bold.. Do you think Hillary has yes "people" around her?

Reading comprehension is pretty important on a message board. I was criticizing her and you somehow failed to recognize it.

 

My point was my mom isn't retired and knitting and not knowing about computers. She's functioning as a business owner and knows nothing about computers. I used this as a comparison because someone can be a SOS without knowing about computers (which I think is Clinton because she's my mom's age) but they need to listen to what the tech people (and other experts) tell them. Clinton clearly didn't do that.

 

lol, show me what line you consider "criticizing her", because the way I read it, you were making excuses because your mom is a successful business woman, who is about the same age as Hillary and she doesn't know anything about computers or technology, either... see the correlation?

 

That statement pretty much fits, from what I have seen, your stance on Hillary... and your stance on Trump.

 

If I remember correctly, you complained about me being abrasive with my early posts, so why the first line? Don't you follow your own advice, or are you a do as I say, not as I do person?

Again, please read what I posted

 

How do you come away from THIS line, which was the entire point of my post, not understanding that I was criticizing her and thinking I was making an excuse???

 

 

The difference is Clinton probably has a huge ego and didn't think it was necessary to listen to the people who know what they're talking about when it comes to this stuff.

 

How do you not understand it's criticism??? I said Clinton has a huge ego. I said she ignored the experts who understand something she's ignorant on.

 

It's so confusing to me that you took it as anything but criticism that I had no other option than to make the reading comprehension comment.

 

And again with my mom, I'm saying she knows she doesn't know about computers but she would listen to the people who do know about them. But Clinton has a big ego and didn't listen. The whole point of the comparison is that lots of old people are totally ignorant on computers/internet so it's likely Clinton is too but it doesn't mean she's not capable of doing the job... As long as she doesn't ignore people like she did about the emails. I'M SAYING IT WAS STUPID.

 

Why am I trying to explain this for a third time?

 

Do I have to use fantastical words line "Clinton's such a dumb dumb like all those other libs for not listening to people who know what they're doing?"

 

I just don't get it. Let me try a 4th time.

 

 

Clinton probably ignored advice on internet security because she's an idiot who didn't think their advice was necessary. This is what I was saying in the original post, and the 2nd post, and the first part of this third post.

Well, I stepped in pretty good. I don't know how the hell I skimmed over that, pretty important line.. twice! I would try to blame it on all the games, but that doesn't explain my post a little bit ago.. geez, maybe I should be more careful reading "everything".

 

My fault and my apologizes!

No worries. And I'm sorry for the "dumb dumb... libs" comment but I was going crazy, heh.

 

 

No, I'm the idiot for skimming over that part.. I formed an opinion base on the first sentence and skipped the rest.

[huskerfan2000]

hmmmm.....so, a large corporation from Germany can come in and thumb their noses at our laws and purposely break them and we are supposed to feel sorry for them because of our horrible regulations.

 

But...those horrible Mexicans who have been here for years being productive members of society....get the mother f'ers out of here. Those horrible criminals have got to go.

 

But...again. Don't punish that poor poor company VW that just got caught up in our out of control regulation.

 

nobody suggested that.. I did talk about unnecessary regulations being the reason why car manufacturer's cheat. Chevy pulled the cruze diesel just after VW had issues, wonder why?

[ZRod]

One could be that there just isn't a market for small diesel cars here...

[huskerfan2000]

One could be that there just isn't a market for small diesel cars here...

 

Well, that isn't true.. They sell very fast, always have. Again, I know I have been looking. Dealers can't keep them in stock.

[huskerfan2000]

back to the subject of this thread..

 

 

[huskerfan2000]

another gem

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6M67nHDmNE

[huskerfan2000]

How anyone can say with a straight face this women is even the slightest bit qualified is beyond me, and it shows brainwashing. I am very sorry, i don't mean to offend anyone, but it is 100% true.

 

This woman is way more scarier than Trump, and he is bad.

 

 

PLEASE, stop being partisan and do not vote for this woman. We will regret it!