r06ue1 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 #6 Nebraska http://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CompositeTeamRankings 1 Quote Link to comment
jaws Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Alabama at #63. Lets see how this plays out. Quote Link to comment
deedsker Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Lots of Big 10 teams near the top...wtf? Quote Link to comment
Toe Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Now about that recruiting for positions that aren't WR or QB... 1 Quote Link to comment
chainsaw Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 I didn't know we were recruiting any QB's? Might wanna get a few WR as we seem short there. Gee, i'm seeing a coaching staff that knows what were doing! Quote Link to comment
Toe Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Last class, half of the 4* guys were WRs. So far this class, half of the 4* guys are WRs. We might need some receivers, but receivers don't comprise 50% of a team. Quote Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Now about that recruiting for positions that aren't WR or QB... We aren't actively recruiting a QB. Quote Link to comment
Ed Helms Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Last class, half of the 4* guys were WRs. So far this class, half of the 4* guys are WRs. We might need some receivers, but receivers don't comprise 50% of a team. Quote Link to comment
Toe Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Now about that recruiting for positions that aren't WR or QB... We aren't actively recruiting a QB. I was referring to this staff's performance since they've been here, not this year specifically. They've brought in some strong recruits at WR and QB, yes. But look at the other 80% of the team, and the recruiting has been, well, not as much of an upgrade as some are making it out to be. Though getting recruits earlier in the cycle is an improvement over Bo's last-minute scramble. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Last class, half of the 4* guys were WRs. So far this class, half of the 4* guys are WRs. We might need some receivers, but receivers don't comprise 50% of a team. Well, if that's how we are going to measure this. 2014 100% of the 4*s were OL 2015 25% of the 4*s were OL. 2016 40% of the 4*s were OL. Average that out and it's 55%. OL doesn't make up 55% of the team. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.