speedtoburn Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 This is not a damn 17-10 ballgame, what a fluke. Wisconsin is lucky. Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 That wasn't a fluky interception. It was a terrible pass. It was thrown too hard and behind Oz. If Armstrong had thrown that, he would have been crucified. 4 Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 We shouldn't have been throwing it to the sidelines to a running back on 3rd and 2, so I don't consider it a fluke. 4 Quote Link to comment
swmohusker Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Pass, play call, catch... question it but it was there so take play call out. Pass hit him in the hands/face. Take pass out. Catch the dang ball 1 Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 11 minutes ago, swmohusker said: Pass, play call, catch... question it but it was there so take play call out. Pass hit him in the hands/face. Take pass out. Catch the dang ball Was it a good pass? No. It was thrown too hard and behind him. The ball should have been thrown in front of Ozigbo so he can catch it in stride. 2 Quote Link to comment
Blackshirt316 Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 You don't call that play to that back in that game. Not when you just need to get the crowd to explode and your QB a ton of cofidence first. Maybe in the 3rd q quarter if things have gone well, bit there? Not a chance. This staff has no concept of risk/reward and how to manage a playsheet. 1 Quote Link to comment
Hayseed Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 10 hours ago, speedtoburn said: This is not a damn 17-10 ballgame, what a fluke. Wisconsin is lucky. That's the kind of low percentage game Langsdorf calls. We needed two yards......we don't have a running play that's good enough to get us two yards? Frost does. Quote Link to comment
alwayshusking Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 We gave up 353 yards rushing at 7.2 ypc. This one play is insignificant. Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Just now, alwayshusking said: We gave up 353 yards rushing at 7.2 ypc. This one play is insignificant. And some people are saying that defense wasn't a problem. 1 Quote Link to comment
Hayseed Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 1 minute ago, alwayshusking said: We gave up 353 yards rushing at 7.2 ypc. This one play is insignificant. It's as significant as any of it.....really highlights the OC's mindset. 1 minute ago, ColoradoHusk said: And some people are saying that defense wasn't a problem. Who said that? Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Hayseed said: Who said that? In the thread I made last night questioning Diaco. Quote Link to comment
Hayseed Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Just now, ColoradoHusk said: In the thread I made last night questioning Diaco. I have said that they played better until the end of the game when they were just obviously worn out and over-matched. If Lavonte David is on the field ,we don't see the same game. Of course it's the defense....and the offense wasn't much help. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.