Husker IN Hawaii Posted June 5, 2006 Share Posted June 5, 2006 http://collegefootball.rivals.com/content.....asp?CID=549468 Great Article! Matt is a great guy and a class act! Quote Link to comment
HSKRNOKC Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 I will never forget that game. Some say it wasnt legal. I say, a WIN is a WIN suckers!! Quote Link to comment
hootin' annie's goatfarm Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 Matt Davidson's Catch Quote Link to comment
pigsonthewing Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 thats legit. you can see his hands get under the ball Quote Link to comment
hootin' annie's goatfarm Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 that 2nd angle shows it all - his hands are just barely under the ball (bea - u - ti - ful) Quote Link to comment
Touchdown Tommie Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 I thought people were complaining that it was kicked and that is why it shouldn't have been called a catch?? Am I way off? Either way, it was one hell of a catch and I will never forget that play and game. Quote Link to comment
cktuba Posted June 7, 2006 Share Posted June 7, 2006 I hear about this play and 41-24 times 2 every year we play MizzLoser. Please let us beat the snot out of them this year and return to dominating them in Columbia again, so this can stop. Quote Link to comment
Alex 4.0 Posted June 7, 2006 Share Posted June 7, 2006 I thought people were complaining that it was kicked and that is why it shouldn't have been called a catch?? Am I way off? Either way, it was one hell of a catch and I will never forget that play and game. well you are right. They say if the ball is kicked then it is automatically ruled down. The thing about the rule is though, it has to be INTENTIONALLY kicked. And i think it is obvious that it wasnt done on purpose. Of course there will still be people(missouri fans) that cry that "it was kicked" without understanding it had to be done intentionally. Quote Link to comment
cktuba Posted June 7, 2006 Share Posted June 7, 2006 I thought people were complaining that it was kicked and that is why it shouldn't have been called a catch?? Am I way off? Either way, it was one hell of a catch and I will never forget that play and game. well you are right. They say if the ball is kicked then it is automatically ruled down. The thing about the rule is though, it has to be INTENTIONALLY kicked. And i think it is obvious that it wasnt done on purpose. Of course there will still be people(missouri fans) that cry that "it was kicked" without understanding it had to be done intentionally. Dude they (MizzLoser fans) are constantly telling me that it was not only a kick, but an intentional/illegal kick. Basically, everyone down in these parts thinks we cheated to win that year (I say that's BS) and that MU now owns NU (that will change kitty fans). They constantly mention "the kicked ball" in the same breath as the CU "5th down." We need to get back (and I believe we turn the corner this year) to the point where MU is nothing more than a bug on the windshield. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.