Trump's Post Election Fallout: Legal & Obstruction actions

[Archy1221]

3 hours ago, Scarlet said:

It's just you.  Look again.  It's in this thread to pull an @Archy1221

It’s not in your post 

[commando]

9 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

It’s not in your post 

well... there you go again

[Archy1221]

7 minutes ago, commando said:

well... there you go again

You copied a quote and used it in a post without stating which poster’s link it came from or providing a link, and you seem to think it’s a bad thing for someone to ask where it came from so we could read the context of the entire article.   

[commando]

Just now, Archy1221 said:

You copied a quote and used it in a post without stating which poster’s link it came from or providing a link, and you seem to think it’s a bad thing for someone to ask where it came from so we could read the context of the entire article.   

2 people provided links yesterday.    you apparently ignored them.    and to pull an archy...it's there...go find it yourself.

[Archy1221]

19 minutes ago, commando said:

2 people provided links yesterday.    you apparently ignored them.    and to pull an archy...it's there...go find it yourself.

The thread itself is full of links.  If that’s how you choose to post, all the best to you.   It’s not important enough to look though.  
 

Way to make a simple ask personnel though

[commando]

2 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

 

Way to make a simple ask personnel though

that is what you have done to several posters and why we answer in kind.    i will give your effort a grade of F.    

[Archy1221]

Just now, commando said:

that is what you have done to several posters and why we answer in kind.    i will give your effort a grade of F.    

I actually provide the links

[commando]

13 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

I actually provide the links

if you swear you will also provide links when asked in the future i will go back a page and find the links you are asking for.  deal?

[Archy1221]

3 minutes ago, commando said:

if you swear you will also provide links when asked in the future i will go back a page and find the links you are asking for.  deal?

Does it have to be a pinky swear?  
 

 

[commando]

21 hours ago, Scarlet said:

This has been debunked and the facts of the case are why the FBI have not charged Epps.  We all know this unless you're a permanent resident of Conspiracyville

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2022/05/05/us/jan-6-ray-epps-evidence.amp.html

 

 

archy can't find this post.    from 21 hours ago and 2 pages back in this very thread.  instead he would rather blather on about how we don't help him by providing links for an hour.   

16 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

I don’t know. I’m fine investigating everything. 
 

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/13/us/politics/jan-6-conspiracy-theory-ray-epps.html

 

But, the J6 commission is mainly about bigger fish. This is nothing more than a deflection from that.  

or this post

[Archy1221]

7 minutes ago, commando said:

archy can't find this post.    from 21 hours ago and 2 pages back in this very thread.  instead he would rather blather on about how we don't help him by providing links for an hour.   

or this post

Again, the entire thread has probably 50-100 links in it.  Yet you expect someone to know which exact one you pulled a quote from 

 

 

[commando]

3 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

Again, the entire thread has probably 50-100 links in it.  Yet you expect someone to know which exact one you pulled a quote from 

 

 

you have been told it was in the last day.  no need to go through the whole thread.     you also replied right after 1 of the links and 3 posts after another 1 of the links.    you ignored them and still went on about the epps conspiracy theory.    

[Archy1221]

30 minutes ago, commando said:

you have been told it was in the last day.  no need to go through the whole thread.     you also replied right after 1 of the links and 3 posts after another 1 of the links.    you ignored them and still went on about the epps conspiracy theory.    

Busters is behind a paywall and the first article even mentions that Epps is on tape encouraging people to go INTO the Capitol on Jan 5th.  It doesn’t mention that he is also on tape saying they will leave something IN the Capitol on Jan 6th.   Not to mention he texted his nephew admitting to directing people around the Capitol.  
 

Whether or not he is or has worked as an informant against Oath Keepers doesn’t change the fact that he hasn’t been charged for helping to incite a riot IN the Capitol.  I’m wondering why he seems to be the lucky one who has escaped prosecution.  Maybe he should buy some lottery tickets.  

[commando]

13 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

Busters is behind a paywall and the first article even mentions that Epps is on tape encouraging people to go INTO the Capitol on Jan 5th.  It doesn’t mention that he is also on tape saying they will leave something IN the Capitol on Jan 6th.   Not to mention he texted his nephew admitting to directing people around the Capitol.  
 

Whether or not he is or has worked as an informant against Oath Keepers doesn’t change the fact that he hasn’t been charged for helping to incite a riot IN the Capitol.  I’m wondering why he seems to be the lucky one who has escaped prosecution.  Maybe he should buy some lottery tickets.  

still trying to blame epps for everything trump did or are you are saying that everyone that was there needs to be arrested?    

[Archy1221]

13 minutes ago, commando said:

still trying to blame epps for everything trump did or are you are saying that everyone that was there needs to be arrested?    

I’ve never equated Epps and Trump or blamed anything Trump did it didn’t do on Epps.  Please show your work on where I have in the past since you used the word “still”.  
 

everyone inciting a riot should be arrested.  Everyonr damaging the Capitol should. Everyone peacefully protesting outside should not.  That seems pretty clear