What is the future of the Republican Party?

[Guy Chamberlin]

16 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

 

Many of would like that

 

 

 

Many Republicans would like ending farm subsidies to show consistency with their anti-government assistance platform?

 

Many Republicans in the big farm states that give Republicans a Senate and Electoral College advantage?

 

Many Republicans who receive farm subsidies? 

 

Sure about that? 

 

 

[Guy Chamberlin]

3 hours ago, ActualCornHusker said:

 

The climate arguments you make are so ridiculously stupid it's almost incomprehensible.

 

News flash: extreme weather events have ALWAYS happened throughout human history, and are not getting worse or more frequent today due to cLiMaTe ChAnGe... You've been spoonfed this religious doctrine about climate from people who fly private jets around the world and buy ocean-front houses while they lecture you about rising sea levels and the effects of carbon emmisions, and you buy it.

 

LINK

 

 

So in other words, any data showing that extreme weather events are increasing is just due to technological ability to monitor and communicate with the rest of the world for reporting of extreme weather events.

 

Another tidbit for you:

 

 

 

So in other words:

 

Is the climate changing? yes, it always has

How much of it can be attributed to humans? no one can tell you that, and if they claim to know, they're feeding you full of horsesh*t for some ulterior political motive. 

Is the world going to end because of it? Absolutely positively not.

Is it going to create catastrophic weather events that are worse than human history has ever seen? Ridiculous.

 

Now you have the current regime trying to force people onto electric cars as if that's not going to create a whole new set of problems that are more than likely worse than the current set of problems they think they're trying to solve through force (which is called fascism by the way), and here you are spewing the same lefty talking points 

 

Speaking of lefty talking points, you should also take a look at the reality behind your claim that blue states subsidize red states

And if you don't like that one, how about one from a left-leaning site

 

Or maybe one more:

 

 

 

I've long said that the left doesn't actually care about the poor. They just hate the rich out of envy.

 

I didn't mean to gloss over the rest of your post, in which many things are silly. The climate change debate wasn't created by lefty politicians, it was created years ago by climate scientists making observations and taking measurements in a field they know vastly better than you or I.  They are the very first people to understand that  the earth has a long volatile history, and that has not kept them from documenting recent rapid changes. The possibility that the billions of tons of carbon put into the Earth's atmosphere in the past 140 years of the Industrial Revolution may be a contributing factor isn't radical agenda-driven theory, it's common sense. You can always find a scientific contrarian getting clicks by arguing otherwise, but the scientific community is pretty unified on the facts if not the politics swirling around them.

 

Just because a liberal flies his private jet to Davos doesn't mean Climate Change science itself is corrupt. 

 

The Red State/Blue State piece mostly seizes on the rhetoric that Blue States "bail out" the Red States, and the agenda-driven writer makes a plausible argument that the statement is slightly misleading. The bigger picture -- that Red States remain more reliant on federal government assistance then they ever want to admit -- remains intact, and is at the heart of GOP hypocrisy. 

[Archy1221]

5 hours ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

Many Republicans would like ending farm subsidies to show consistency with their anti-government assistance platform?

 

Many Republicans in the big farm states that give Republicans a Senate and Electoral College advantage?

 

Many Republicans who receive farm subsidies? 

 

Sure about that? 

 

 

The many that I associate with.  And Psst I live in a farm state.  So ya many that believe in better fiscal politics 

[Archy1221]

6 hours ago, RedDenver said:

I'm old enough to remember when we were told crazies like MTG weren't the future of the Republican party.

I didn’t realize winning a primary for a house second term meant you were a leader.  Who knew 

 

were did all those Madison Cawthorn is  the future posts and takes go?  I’m sure you are old enough to remember them

[commando]

18 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

 

were did all those Madison Cawthorn is  the future posts and takes go?  I’m sure you are old enough to remember them

he and donald (and others) are organizing the "dark MAGA" insurrection

[BigRedBuster]

21 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

I didn’t realize winning a primary for a house second term meant you were a leader.  Who knew 

 

were did all those Madison Cawthorn is  the future posts and takes go?  I’m sure you are old enough to remember them

Glad to know they have to be Cawthorn bad to lose. 

[Archy1221]

7 hours ago, Dr. Strangelove said:

ult. People will be displaced, environments will collapse, crops will fail. But hey, I suppose living through our 6th mass extinction event is totally worth it as long as I can continue to drive my F-350!

Not sure about the F-350 but the Corvette is a must and worth it. 

[Archy1221]

10 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

Glad to know they have to be Cawthorn bad to lose. 

But you’ve posted many times about him being the future .  Weird that he’s not???

[BigRedBuster]

2 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

But you’ve posted many times about him being the future .  Weird that he’s not???

Interesting that it took as bad as it got for him to lose. Meanwhile…..Marge. 

[BigRedBuster]

You’re picking one idiot out to make a point while there are many others just as pathetic still being supported. 
 

Your point fails. 

[Guy Chamberlin]

1 hour ago, Archy1221 said:

But you’ve posted many times about him being the future .  Weird that he’s not???

 

It's not weird. But you know that. 

 

Marjorie Taylor Greene defeating 5 other Republicans based on what she's shown the voters of Georgia certainly qualifies for this thread. 

 

Do you honestly think Madison Cawthorne self-sabotaging himself out of contention to make room for another Trump loyalist suggests a saner future for the Republican Party?  

 

 

[Guy Chamberlin]

2 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

The many that I associate with.  And Psst I live in a farm state.  So ya many that believe in better fiscal politics 

 

Ya. People say that. Until they take the money away. 

 

Pssst. You live in a Republican controlled state that rejected Obamacare. Should be no problem to reject those farm subsidies and their fetid stench of socialism. 

 

Given the "many" who think like you do, can you find a single Kansas Republican who has articulated those anti-subsidy beliefs on your behalf, and advanced a fiscal policy to address them?

[BigRedBuster]

2 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

The many that I associate with.  And Psst I live in a farm state.  So ya many that believe in better fiscal politics 

Pssst…..I live in farm country. Farmers are always concerned that a good farm bill us passed. 
 

They want government regulations out of farming, but keep the subsidies. 

[Archy1221]

2 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

You’re picking one idiot out to make a point while there are many others just as pathetic still being supported. 
 

Your point fails. 

It doesn’t.  You mentioned several times he was the future and I said several times he wasn’t.  He’s not even going to re-elected to Congress

[Archy1221]

1 hour ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

It's not weird. But you know that. 

 

Marjorie Taylor Greene defeating 5 other Republicans based on what she's shown the voters of Georgia certainly qualifies for this thread. 

 

Do you honestly think Madison Cawthorne self-sabotaging himself out of contention to make room for another Trump loyalist suggests a saner future for the Republican Party?  

 

 

It’s weird, which you know.  Being invested in the narrative,   I understand why you can’t say so though.