Jump to content


All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. sounds like passthedamnballguy is going to be happy
  3. As perplexing as it is for Atlanta to draft an old prospect to sit behind a QB they just paid 9 gajillion dollars to, Buffalo is almost as big of a dud. From Buffalo's perspective, the trade makes a lot of sense without context. They didn't see any more value to be extracted from the first round, and between the Chiefs trade and subsequent Carolina trade they only move down 5 spots and pretty substantially upgrade from a 4th to a 3rd and a 6th to a 5th and swapped 7ths. That's some pretty good extracted extra value. They didn't get any more picks, but they already had 10 picks so from their viewpoint they saw a lot of value to get back into the 3rd round which the Chiefs provided. But trading to KC? They know what that means for them. Just a few weeks prior when they moved Diggs the rumor was he could go anywhere but KC. So, instead, they allow KC to trade up when KC was heavily linked to the fastest WR in the class. When that speed can unlock this suddenly stagnant KC offense. When KC is the team that knocks them out nearly every year since Mahomes was drafted.......consequently the last time the Bills traded down with KC.
  4. Just adds more context to our opponents. Sucks to lose to them but they seem to be a pretty solid team.
  5. Today
  6. Very well said. This is a corrupt Supreme Court. They barely touched on the only question they should have been considering. Here's the whole thread: As with the three-hour argument in Trump v. Anderson, a disconcertingly precious little of the two-hour argument today was even devoted to the specific and only question presented for decision. The Court and the parties discussed everything but the specific question presented. That question is simply whether a former President of the United States may be prosecuted for attempting to remain in power notwithstanding the election of his successor by the American People. thereby also depriving his lawfully elected successor of the powers of the presidency to which that successor became entitled upon his rightful election by the American People -- and preventing the peaceful transfer of power for the first time in American history. It is not even arguably a core power or function of the President of the United States to ensure the fairness, accuracy, and integrity of a presidential election. Let alone is it a core power or function of the President of the United States to ensure the proper certification of the next president by the Congress of the United States. Neither of these is a power or function of the president at all. In fact, the Framers of the Constitution well understood the enormous potential for self-interested conflict were the President to have a role in these fundamental constitutional functions. Consequently, they purposely and pointedly withheld from the President any role in these fundamental constitutional functions. To whatever extent the Framers implicitly provided in the Executive any role whatsoever in these fundamental constitutional functions, it was a limited role for the Executive Branch, through the Department of Justice, to inquire into allegations of fraud in presidential elections and ensure that the election was free, fair, and accurate. The former president’s Department of Justice did just that and found that there was no fraud sufficient to draw into question the results of the 2020 presidential election. The former president of course has refused to this day to accept that finding by not only his own Department of Justice, but also countless others of his closest advisors. Whether undertaken in his or her “official,” “candidate,” or “personal” capacity, a President of the United States has never been and can never be immune from prosecution (after leaving office), for having attempted to remain in power notwithstanding the election of that President’s successor by the American People. Consequently, there is no reason whatsoever for the Supreme Court to remand to the lower courts for a determination of which of the alleged criminal acts might have been personal and which might have been official. Neither is a clear statement from Congress that a president is subject to prosecution under the statutes with which the former president has been charged necessary in this particular case. As applied to the former president for the criminal conduct with which he has been charged, there can be no question but that Congress intended a President of the United States to come within the ambit of the statutory offenses with which he has been charged. For the same reason, it would be ludicrous to contend that the former president was not on sufficient notice that if he committed the criminal acts charged, he would be subject to criminal prosecution by the United States of America. To hold otherwise would make a mockery out of the “plain statement” rule.
  7. This seems like a logical move and one that could work.
  8. Federal officers can absolutely be charged in the conspiracy. Trump's not out of the woods yet in the example of Arizona. The prosecutor may have several reasons for not charging yet, one being that he may be using the chargers against the other co-conspirators to flip on Trump.
  9. They'll take Edwards if they can land him, not sure I'd say he's leaning Nebraska's way, though.
  10. Callahan and Sipp were saying it seems like HH is the clear #2 right now, FWIW.
  11. It's a process. I do think Rhule's strategy could pay dividends - keeping a very large roster that eventually becomes 4 and 5 year seniors is something Nebraska can do. Supplementing 4* talent - even if limited - can be effective with an older, experienced roster. Can Nebraska build and maintain that roster in the era of the transfer portal? It's a risky strategy, but with Nebraska's limited recruiting base it may be the only strategy that can mitigate the Blue Chip gap.
  12. So .... Saban admits to tampering...
  13. I don't hate 3* players. It's not a good strategy to have your recruiting class be 3/4ths of them.
  14. I will be the first to admit I’m wrong. But I’m just not seeing the continuity in development with relying on transfers — especially if Coach Prime losses a lot in the portal. But what do I know.
  15. If DR is the starter, hopefully they redshirt DK. If true that HH has improved his passing and is not as turnover prone, he might be an OK backup.
  1. Load more activity

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...