krc1995

krc, there's no need to get liability insurance if it's just permission. The chances of you being liable during an accident is slim to none. Most states rely on landowner cooperation and permission to allow hunters access to their properties for hunting (with permission of course). States don't want lawsuits to compromise that revenue they receive selling hunting licenses especially when 99% of the state is privately owned. 

I’m not suggesting you get it solely for that reason or that you allow or disallow access. But this is the world we live in now.

I got a personal liability policy a long time ago because we have a trampoline and I wasn’t about to prohibit my kid’s friends from coming into the yard and playing on it. But if somebody had got hurt.....

There are a thousand other examples of why I still have it and why it’s not a bad idea to have one. They really aren’t very expensive. Ironically, the fact a person has one may make it more likely you get sued for something. Lawyers are always looking for the party with deep pockets. At least it will be the insurance company’s money and not mine, if it’s ever needed.

You are not allowed to hunt on private property unless you are given permission from the owner, thats why they sell expensive maps showing property that is public and private for hunting.  First its common courtesy and second the property owner can take your kill if hunted on their property plus you can lose your gun vehicle and big fines.  If someone is given permission and they get hurt thats their fault and you gain nothing from letting them hunt so you wont be held at fault.