teachercd

Here is why I say it...hear me out for a second.

1. No one that can score off the bounce

2. No one that can rebound

3. No stopper on Defense

4. Week conference (if Cincy, Ville and Cuse had been there still that would have been 6 more losses, 6 less wins...making them 22-13 (I think)

I think that like you said, they relied on hitting 15 threes a game...that is kind of smoke and mirrors.

oh, i knew CU had fundamental problems that worried me going into the tourney. like i said, everything is contingent on them scoring. they are bad at rebounding, so they usually only get one shot. they only play good defense when they are shooting well, so if they other team is scoring, they do not get to run in transition like they want to. i guess it is just semantics. i think, when shooting well, they are one of the best teams in the best teams in the nation. when not shooting well, they a...

... are terribly average.