rkhufu7 Posted March 15, 2009 Share Posted March 15, 2009 That only know of UT and OU winning. They fail to realize that Osborne's teams were not winners because of top 10 recruiting classes like the teams are built today. His teams beat many recruiting gurus like CU, UF and Tennessee. The old NU ran a SYSTEM and recruited to fit that system. They didn't just recruit folks because others recruited them. Quote Link to comment
Ringer02 Posted March 15, 2009 Share Posted March 15, 2009 I'm pretty sure most people here realize this, In fact i saw Tom in Topeka a few weeks ago and this was one of the things he talked about. Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted March 15, 2009 Share Posted March 15, 2009 Agree with huskernation, I think everybody here realizes this, but considering that UT and OU have been beating us for most of the decade it makes sense. We all can't live in the 90's forever... Quote Link to comment
huskerfan500 Posted March 15, 2009 Share Posted March 15, 2009 So first off I am one of those "youth" by age at least. Second off I am pretty sure NU had some top recuirts in the 90's, I know both Peters and Winstrom were. I am not arguing they all were stars, but there were quite a few. And a major thing is that the world has changed, not only is recruiting more mainstream (let alone the internet is used by almost everyone, not just a few "nerds" as before). So no one really knows how kids would have been ranked with these raters/rating systems today. I am not completely disagreeing and accept recuirting rankings dont = wins, but they are not totally meaningless Quote Link to comment
Huskers Forever Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 That only know of UT and OU winning. They fail to realize that Osborne's teams were not winners because of top 10 recruiting classes like the teams are built today. His teams beat many recruiting gurus like CU, UF and Tennessee. The old NU ran a SYSTEM and recruited to fit that system. They didn't just recruit folks because others recruited them. Like I said in the other thread, the class that started it all in the 90's was ranked in the 20's, but Osborne had some very highly ranked classes. The 1995 and 1996 classes were ranked as high as #2 and #3 in the country. We recruited alot more than just system players, we went after the best talent in the country. The same players all the other big boys at the time went after. You really need to do some research on Husker recruiting. You don't think Tommie Frasier was recruited by the big boys? Quote Link to comment
topekahusker Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 I'm pretty sure most people here realize this, In fact i saw Tom in Topeka a few weeks ago and this was one of the things he talked about. HuskerNation - I didn't realize anyone else on the board was in attendance. Jump in with anything you want to add to my notes in another thread that I started. I hope to meet you at Sean Callahan's recruiting/spring game breakdown. Quote Link to comment
HuskerJosh Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 What up Yoda? Died, I thought you did. Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 The old NU ran a SYSTEM and recruited to fit that system. They didn't just recruit folks because others recruited them. You are speaking only of offense right? On defense the best Osborne teams always had a lots of talent. Talent that would have succeeded in any scheme. Quote Link to comment
hskrfan4life Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 What was the recruiting class of Chase daniel and Maclin rated with missouri Quote Link to comment
HuskerJen Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 That only know of UT and OU winning. They fail to realize that Osborne's teams were not winners because of top 10 recruiting classes like the teams are built today. His teams beat many recruiting gurus like CU, UF and Tennessee. The old NU ran a SYSTEM and recruited to fit that system. They didn't just recruit folks because others recruited them. Like I said in the other thread, the class that started it all in the 90's was ranked in the 20's, but Osborne had some very highly ranked classes. The 1995 and 1996 classes were ranked as high as #2 and #3 in the country. We recruited alot more than just system players, we went after the best talent in the country. The same players all the other big boys at the time went after. You really need to do some research on Husker recruiting. You don't think Tommie Frasier was recruited by the big boys? .... It's Tommie Frazier...not Frasier. And Tommie was recruited by Florida State, Miami and other schools...as a DB. Quote Link to comment
huskerfan500 Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 I'm pretty sure most people here realize this, In fact i saw Tom in Topeka a few weeks ago and this was one of the things he talked about. HuskerNation - I didn't realize anyone else on the board was in attendance. Jump in with anything you want to add to my notes in another thread that I started. I hope to meet you at Sean Callahan's recruiting/spring game breakdown. I doubt he will attend, recuirting doesn't matter Quote Link to comment
DJR313 Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 That only know of UT and OU winning. They fail to realize that Osborne's teams were not winners because of top 10 recruiting classes like the teams are built today. His teams beat many recruiting gurus like CU, UF and Tennessee. The old NU ran a SYSTEM and recruited to fit that system. They didn't just recruit folks because others recruited them. Ok, I'll bite. I don't necessarily consider myself old or young, I am 29. However, those that look back in awe of the glory years only like to thing that the Huskers built up the empire with a roster that consisted solely of walk-on beefeaters from Smalltown, Nebraska. Osborne had some of the best recruiting classes in the country. Between 93 and 98, I think all classes were rated no lower than 12th. The 1985 class with Steve Taylor and Sandman was a consensus #1 class. What about the class with Turner Gill? It's this head in the clouds infatuation with the 80s and 90s that is annoying. Quote Link to comment
cb1954 Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 What was the recruiting class of Chase daniel and Maclin rated with missouri According to Rivals (other selectors will have different results) here are the rankings for the last 6 years for NU and Mizzu Starting with the most recent class (2009) and going back to 2004's class) MU - 40.30,33,47,39,29 NU - 28-25-13-20- 5-27 Chase Daniel was in the 05 class which was ranked # 39, compared to NU's 5. Callahan got Harrison Beck. Maclin was in the 06 class ranked 47 to NU's 20 He was recruited by Cosgrove for NU, don't know if he ever had any real interest in Nebraska, doesn't look like OU even offered him. Rivals Years ago, there were no rankings. You would probably hear who the recruits were on signing day. You can't even find lists for most years prior to 1972. Going just by memory (which might be wrong at my age) one of Osborne's highest ranked classes was the one with Steve Taylor and Broderick Thomas. Think they were one of the top 2-3 in the country. But 10 of the 25 recruits never even lettered at NU. T.O. had some top 10 classes, most were probably in the top 25. I think 1992 with Frazier was ranked fairly decent. Quote Link to comment
Huskers Forever Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 That only know of UT and OU winning. They fail to realize that Osborne's teams were not winners because of top 10 recruiting classes like the teams are built today. His teams beat many recruiting gurus like CU, UF and Tennessee. The old NU ran a SYSTEM and recruited to fit that system. They didn't just recruit folks because others recruited them. Like I said in the other thread, the class that started it all in the 90's was ranked in the 20's, but Osborne had some very highly ranked classes. The 1995 and 1996 classes were ranked as high as #2 and #3 in the country. We recruited alot more than just system players, we went after the best talent in the country. The same players all the other big boys at the time went after. You really need to do some research on Husker recruiting. You don't think Tommie Frasier was recruited by the big boys? .... It's Tommie Frazier...not Frasier. And Tommie was recruited by Florida State, Miami and other schools...as a DB. Damn, I can't even spell my favorite Huskers name correctly. His top 3 were Nebraska, Notre Dame and Clemson, and I still remember it was big news when he commited to NU. I wish I would have saved the Journal Star article on it. Quote Link to comment
HuskerJen Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 That only know of UT and OU winning. They fail to realize that Osborne's teams were not winners because of top 10 recruiting classes like the teams are built today. His teams beat many recruiting gurus like CU, UF and Tennessee. The old NU ran a SYSTEM and recruited to fit that system. They didn't just recruit folks because others recruited them. Like I said in the other thread, the class that started it all in the 90's was ranked in the 20's, but Osborne had some very highly ranked classes. The 1995 and 1996 classes were ranked as high as #2 and #3 in the country. We recruited alot more than just system players, we went after the best talent in the country. The same players all the other big boys at the time went after. You really need to do some research on Husker recruiting. You don't think Tommie Frasier was recruited by the big boys? .... It's Tommie Frazier...not Frasier. And Tommie was recruited by Florida State, Miami and other schools...as a DB. Damn, I can't even spell my favorite Huskers name correctly. His top 3 were Nebraska, Notre Dame and Clemson, and I still remember it was big news when he commited to NU. I wish I would have saved the Journal Star article on it. It was big news no doubt. The only reason Nebraska was able to lure Frazier away from Miami, Florida State, Notre Lame, Clemson, etc was because Nebraska wanted him as a QB. All the other schools were projecting him as a defensive back, specifically a safety. (Although my memory fails as to whether it was as a FS or SS.) And the rest is, as they say, history... Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.