Igetbored216 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 Yaaaaaaaay, now we have a new WR Lee can overthrow or throw behind. Quote Link to comment
irafreak Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 I still say run the ball more to open up the pass then they just stick in the guy with the best hands to catch a deep ball. Quote Link to comment
billdozer15 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 I still say run the ball more to open up the pass then they just stick in the guy with the best hands to catch a deep ball. Run, run, run, play action to one of our 5 TE's all with better hands than any receiver we have. Quote Link to comment
irafreak Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 I still say run the ball more to open up the pass then they just stick in the guy with the best hands to catch a deep ball. Run, run, run, play action to one of our 5 TE's all with better hands than any receiver we have. It worked in 03 (when Lord could hit the open man) and our rushing attack wasn't world class. It seems like Zac can throw a good deep ball. Quote Link to comment
adc7236 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 I had high hopes for a receiver corps this year, but they have disappointed. To many dropped passes and failure to get open. Young guys or old guys, I just want someone to step up to the plate and get it done. Another observation, dropped balls are on both O and D....how many of our guys dropped sure INTs? Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 I had high hopes for a receiver corps this year, but they have disappointed. To many dropped passes and failure to get open. Young guys or old guys, I just want someone to step up to the plate and get it done. Another observation, dropped balls are on both O and D....how many of our guys dropped sure INTs? The INT drops are a good point, but those guys are typically on defense for a reason. It's more critical, to me, that our WRs drop passes than our DBs drop INTs. Quote Link to comment
Pedro Guerrero Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 It worked in 03 (when Lord could hit the open man) Which was 48% of the time. Quote Link to comment
HuskerNBigD Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 It worked in 03 (when Lord could hit the open man) Which was 48% of the time. The other 52% consisted of ten yard bounce passes.... Quote Link to comment
irafreak Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 It worked in 03 (when Lord could hit the open man) Which was 48% of the time. The other 52% consisted of ten yard bounce passes.... Wasn't that the worst! I'm yelling "just underthrow it! The closest guy if 15 yards!" Happened almost everygame. kstate (multiple times) Quote Link to comment
Washusker Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Brooks is unfortunately not making the trip. Expect to see Paul, Kinnie, Cooper and possibly Marlowe getting lots of snaps early in the game at WR. Actually a 3 wide set with Paul, Kinnie and Cooper could be pretty solid, then use Robinson between the tackles a bit more and you know who at QB. Almost sounds...sparky I think this is what you'll see. Should have happened last week, in fact. Time to start getting more athleticism and playmaking ability on the field. Time to start building for the future. The "experienced" players haven't done the job, so you might as well get some more 'spark' on the field, even if it is young. This game could be the beginning of the future for Husker football. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.