tman Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 The refs called a personal foul helmet to helmet against Meredith on the Gabbert sack. This was completely blown as well. If you go back and look at the video, you will see: 1. His head is up. 2. His shoulder pads make contact first, since his head is above his shoulders, his helmet slides to the side of Gabbert's helmet. Circumstances dictate helmet contact. 3. Even with helmet contact, it was the side of his facemask that contacted Gabbert's helmet. 4. Rule 1: Helmet to Helmet penalties involves the use of the "Crown" of the helmet which is the TOP of the helmet. 5. Rule 2: Penalties for helmet hits has to involve "Targeting with the crown" and with defenseless players. 6. Meredith fits non of these scenerios. He did not contact with the crown of his helmet. He was not after a defenseless player since Gabbert was actively scrambling and escaping the sack fully aware of the defenders and players around him which makes him a ball carrier. And Last, I do believe that this call allowed Missouri a new set of downs which they went down and scored. Quote Link to comment
ADS Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 On the other hand, we still won. And have the Bell forever now. Quote Link to comment
ESPY Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 On the other hand, we still won. And have the Bell forever now. Regardless...I agree it was a bad call and could've proven very costly. Quote Link to comment
Husker Richard Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 This helmet to helmet thing is getting out of hand. Helmets contact each other on EVERY single play. That's why you wear one. Eventually they'll need to start suspending offensive and defensive linemen for the collision of helmets that occurs on every snap. Quote Link to comment
HuskerMav11 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 yeah...let it go. All is not fair in football. We got the W, regardless! Quote Link to comment
epocSoN Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 1. It was a personal foul. 2. He grabbed his facemask 3. Cams head and eyes dropped at the last second. The call was correct. Quote Link to comment
epocSoN Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 Like I posted before. Eyes down... Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 We are starting to have some pretty redundant threads regarding helmet-to-helmet calls. Might be time for another mass merging. Quote Link to comment
jas11 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 It was the correct call Quote Link to comment
Hercules Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 1. It was a personal foul. 2. He grabbed his facemask 3. Cams head and eyes dropped at the last second. The call was correct. It wasn't a facemask penalty, it was a helmet-to-helmet call. Meredith wasn't leading with the crown of his helmet. This seems to me another example of a helmet-to-helmet collision that is not avoidable in college football. It wasn't a malicious hit, he was not leading with the crown of his helmet. I don't know how you ask Meredith to defend that play any differently then he did. The call in question begins at 4:44 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bykj1svCSEg Quote Link to comment
tman Posted November 2, 2010 Author Share Posted November 2, 2010 That is a moment in time. Play the whole sequence and you'll see my point. Also, how can you possibly say where his eyes are? The neck is bowed with the numbers on the back of the helmet tucked into the neck of the shoulder pads meaning his head is UP. Quote Link to comment
Hercules Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 Like I posted before. Eyes down... You can't even see the N on his helmet in this picture, much less where his eyes are pointed. Quote Link to comment
epocSoN Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 Doesn't matter anyway, the reason I'm ok with the call is because he had his hand on his mask. End of discussion. Quote Link to comment
irafreak Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 We benefited from one against OSU.... Quote Link to comment
mnhusker Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 We are starting to have some pretty redundant threads regarding helmet-to-helmet calls. Might be time for another mass merging. Can we start a thread called "redundant threads" ....... Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.