Jump to content


Secondary?


Mosskid84

Recommended Posts



'Seconday' - Pass Rush? A good 2009, 2010 pass rush or any QB pressure makes a secondary look better

 

Yes, exactly.

 

Our DL had its bright spots, but they got worked today. It was the biggest factor in why Fresno's offense did so well. Very disappointing.

 

An awful lot of the sacks we got in 2009 and 2010 would also be considered coverage sacks.

 

We need the whole defense to play a lot better than today, front to back.

Link to comment

'Seconday' - Pass Rush? A good 2009, 2010 pass rush or any QB pressure makes a secondary look better

 

Yes, exactly.

 

Our DL had its bright spots, but they got worked today. It was the biggest factor in why Fresno's offense did so well. Very disappointing.

Hard to get a solid pass rush when they roll the pocket so well. I think ability to jam the recievers would've given time for the linebackers to blitz those rollouts.

Link to comment

Give this unit some time to get experience under there belts. We are replacing a ton of talent in the secondary, 2 games in we shouldnt be expecting world beaters out there. By conference play our defense will be the least of our concerns.

 

All in all the whole defense played like crap not just the secondary.

 

Fresno did a great job of rolling the pocket to give little Carr some time.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...