zoogs Posted March 13, 2013 Share Posted March 13, 2013 Since there isn't a thread on this yet...(I think) I'm bummed out right now and have nothing to add. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted March 13, 2013 Share Posted March 13, 2013 Broncos reportedly sign Wes Welker (2 years, $12M) and Stewart Bradley (1 year deal). Quote Link to comment
Atbone95 Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 For my fellow Broncos fans: I'm a little concerned. The Broncos can't cut Elvis Dumervil. They just can't. Give him his money and move on. In other news, I wouldn't mind signing a big name CB or RB yet. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 For my fellow Broncos fans: I'm a little concerned. The Broncos can't cut Elvis Dumervil. They just can't. Give him his money and move on. In other news, I wouldn't mind signing a big name CB or RB yet. Signed Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie. Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted March 14, 2013 Author Share Posted March 14, 2013 Great in-depth piece on how the Welker deal went down. http://espn.go.com/b...-danny-amendola Pats' final offer: 2 years, 10 million w/incentives that could up it to almost 16. Welker camp felt it would be too hard to reach; Pats would not budge. Patriots didn't want to lose both him and Amendola and moved quickly as soon as the Welker talks puttered out on Tuesday in advance of the official free agency start. When Welker got his Denver offer he called back to check if New England would sweeten the deal, and was told sorry, the team had already made other commitments. Life moves on fast in the NFL, wow. From this standpoint the Pats were pretty damn competitive with their offer. Welker paid the price of saying no to it, if you could call catching passes from Peyton Manning a sentence. Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted March 14, 2013 Author Share Posted March 14, 2013 The fact of the matter is that Welker is an above-average player...who is replaceable. It boggles my mind that analysts/the media apparently don't watch Welker run patterns. Even HOFer Michael Irvin spoke today on NFL Network about Welker's "great timing". Please. He runs what is known as a "speed cut", meaning he is immediately taking a curved direction toward the area in which he should receive the ball yards before any defender can even get close to him. After that, it's a matter of reading defences and his quarterback getting him the ball in stride within the proper passing window (and/or in between zones in defensive pass coverage). Granted, this is not as easy as it sounds, particularly because it depends on both the receiver and QB being in sync - which Brady and Welker so ofter were. But New England runs those patterns ad nauseum for one main reason: It doesn't require a superstar physical talent to perform this receiving duty. It requires an above average one - one that can be replaced once their perceived value exceeds what the team believes his value to be. Honestly - watch Welker run patterns. The ball is there before anyone else is. Simple. It's not like he's making great moves, has blazing speed, or can out-jump/-fight most players for the ball. (Besides, over the last few years, Welker has shown a gap in his hands range, much like a baseball hitter has a gap in their swing - he doesn't catch the balls thrown over his shoulder that require full arm extension. It happened early on in the AFC final last season, and it will happen again.) Sure, go ahead and like Welker. He's a good player with exceptional stats. But he's more of an effect of the scheme than he is a precipitator. Like I've been saying - watch his patterns. They don't require good moves. When was the last time anyone said "great, athletic move by Welker to lose the defender(s)"? Because he doesn't do that. He runs the offence, just like Edelman did when he stepped in - and also made himself look better than he is. The Pats will move on, and so will Welker. Chances are that if New England falters this season it won't be because they miss their old slot receiver for the last 6 years. Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/nfl/news/20130313/peter-king-on-welker/#ixzz2NVBaeymV From the comments section of Peter King's SI.com article deriding the Patriots for miscalculating Welker's value. Posting because it makes me feel better. Also I sort of agree. Quote Link to comment
HuskerShark Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Cassell cut by the Chiefs, picked up by the Vikings with a chance to start. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Cassell cut by the Chiefs, picked up by the Vikings with a chance to start. Chiefs logic? He'll be a pro-bowler for the Vikings and win a playoff game. Probably go to the Super Bowl. Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted March 14, 2013 Author Share Posted March 14, 2013 With a chance to start? I thought the Vikings really believed in Ponder. Quote Link to comment
GSG Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Stephen Jackson to Hot 'Lanta Quote Link to comment
GSG Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Unrelated to Free Agency, but: NFL owners are looking at abandoning the "tuck rule" Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Is there any doubt the Patriots will get the most out of Amendola? He'll be fine as long as he stays healthy. Quote Link to comment
HuskerShark Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Not gonna lie, the Niners and Seahawks are setting themselves up to be pretty damn dominant for the next few years. Awesome power run games, stout defenses, young playmaking QBs, and skill position players to top it all off. They are 2 teams I wouldn't enjoy playing on any given Sunday if I were another NFL team, coach, player, or owner. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Not gonna lie, the Niners and Seahawks are setting themselves up to be pretty damn dominant for the next few years. Awesome power run games, stout defenses, young playmaking QBs, and skill position players to top it all off. They are 2 teams I wouldn't enjoy playing on any given Sunday if I were another NFL team, coach, player, or owner. Pete Carroll. Quote Link to comment
Ulty Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 With a chance to start? I thought the Vikings really believed in Ponder. Lol, they can go ahead and give Cassell more chances to start if they want. He'll still suck! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.