Jump to content


Bowe Bergdahl- POW or Deserter?


Recommended Posts


wow! sometimes I am just astonished at what is the new norm!

 

 

JJ, I am sorry to say that you are speaking to some deaf ears about your feelings here! :throw

Please elaborate Takoda.

I don't get the feeling that I am that far off base from what others feel here. Maybe yesterday a little bit but since I have moderated my position even carl :thumbs thinks I'm ok.

Link to comment

 

wow! sometimes I am just astonished at what is the new norm!

 

 

JJ, I am sorry to say that you are speaking to some deaf ears about your feelings here! :throw

Please elaborate Takoda.

I don't get the feeling that I am that far off base from what others feel here. Maybe yesterday a little bit but since I have moderated my position even carl :thumbs thinks I'm ok.

 

 

You are right on according to how I view it (if he is indeed a traitor or deserter) would not have cost the lives of other Americans and or give in to terrorist demands to get him back, but it appears those thoughts/feelings are (or were at the beginning of the thread) few and far between. That was what I was saying. If I am unaware of other important factors, then my bad but if truly deserted and truly aiding the enemy, I have no need to rethink my thoughts. (Unless this is all propaganda) which we know never happens.

Link to comment

You are right on according to how I view it (if he is indeed a traitor or deserter) would not have cost the lives of other Americans and or give in to terrorist demands to get him back, but it appears those thoughts/feelings are (or were at the beginning of the thread) few and far between. That was what I was saying. If I am unaware of other important factors, then my bad but if truly deserted and truly aiding the enemy, I have no need to rethink my thoughts. (Unless this is all propaganda) which we know never happens. [/size]

This is a bit rambling, but I think I agree with it. There's so much we don't know yet, it's hard to work up too much concern at this point.

 

1. Did he desert, or was he out of it in some way, like Albert Blithe in Band of Brothers?

2. Are we closing down Gitmo, and were these dudes going to be released soon anyway?

3. What is Qatar going to do with these guys? I haven't heard anything about the security in place for them, whether they're going to be released eventually, nothing.

4. Is this all some plot/ploy by the Administration?

5. Why now?

 

There are about 100 ways this could turn out OK and 100 it could turn into a disaster. Likely the outcome will be somewhere in between, so until we know anything, I'm going to take a wait-and-see approach.

Link to comment

 

You are right on according to how I view it (if he is indeed a traitor or deserter) would not have cost the lives of other Americans and or give in to terrorist demands to get him back, but it appears those thoughts/feelings are (or were at the beginning of the thread) few and far between. That was what I was saying. If I am unaware of other important factors, then my bad but if truly deserted and truly aiding the enemy, I have no need to rethink my thoughts. (Unless this is all propaganda) which we know never happens. [/size]

This is a bit rambling, but I think I agree with it. There's so much we don't know yet, it's hard to work up too much concern at this point.

 

1. Did he desert, or was he out of it in some way, like Albert Blithe in Band of Brothers?

2. Are we closing down Gitmo, and were these dudes going to be released soon anyway?

3. What is Qatar going to do with these guys? I haven't heard anything about the security in place for them, whether they're going to be released eventually, nothing.

4. Is this all some plot/ploy by the Administration?

5. Why now?

 

There are about 100 ways this could turn out OK and 100 it could turn into a disaster. Likely the outcome will be somewhere in between, so until we know anything, I'm going to take a wait-and-see approach.

 

 

Whaaaaaaaat? :ahhhhhhhh

Link to comment

 

 

Oh, and the Talis that we released? Baddest of the bad. No question.

In what way?

 

Here is a brief description of who we unleashed upon the western world:

 

—Abdul Haq Wasiq, who served as the Taliban deputy minister of intelligence

 

—Mullah Norullah Nori, a senior Taliban commander in the northern city of Mazar-e-Sharif when the Taliban fought U.S. forces in late 2001

 

—Khairullah Khairkhwa, who served in various Taliban positions including interior minister and had direct ties to Mullah Omar and Osama bin Laden

 

—Mohammed Nabi, who served as chief of security for the Taliban in Qalat, Afghanistan, and later worked as a radio operator for the Taliban's communications office in Kabul

 

—Mohammad Fazl, whom Human Rights Watch says could be prosecuted for war crimes for presiding over the mass killing of Shiite Muslims in Afghanistan in 2000 and 2001 as the Taliban sought to consolidate their control over the country.

Link to comment

 

 

 

 

A classified document exists detailing an investigation into this that was conducted immediately upon his disappearance. That investigation found, without a doubt, that he deserted. All the talk of him being a POW is bs. He is a deserter. He left his brothers to join the enemy. He was supposed to be manning a guard post but instead, dumped all of his sensitive items, grabbed a compass, a diary, a knife and some water and proceeded to walk away. These are facts. I know dudes that had boots on the ground the next day whom were intimately involved with both the investigation as well as the recovery efforts. Another fact; men died, unnecessarily, looking for this POS. He neither deserves, nor will he get any sympathy from me. He is an enemy sympatyhizer, plain and simple. He deserves to be tried and punished and, now that all this feel good bs has blown up in the admins collective face, he will be. They will have no choice. Since we are not technically at "war," he won't be eligible for the firing squad. Too bad, really...

 

I wouldn't count on that. If he gets court martialed I'm almost positive there will be some way he's found unfit. That's if it even gets to a court martial. Chances are slim, I'd say.

 

I'd be surprised if he wasn't court-martialed but he won't be put to death . . .

 

Correct. Since we have not officialy declared war, firing squad is off the table as I understand the requlation. Here's an excerpt of the UCMJ:

 

Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)

 

ART. 85. DESERTION

 

 

(a) Any member of the armed forces who--

 

 

(1) without authority goes or remains absent from his unit, organization, or place of duty with intent to remain away therefrom permanently;

 

(2) quits his unit, organization, or place of duty with intent to avoid hazardous duty or to shirk important service; or

 

(3) without being regularly separated from one of the armed forces enlists or accepts an appointment in the same or another on of the armed forces without fully disclosing the fact that he has not been regularly separated, or enters any foreign armed service except when authorized by the United States;

 

is guilty of desertion.

 

(b) Any commissioned officer of the armed forces who, after tender of his resignation and before notice of its acceptance, quits his post or proper duties without leave and with intent to remain away therefrom permanently is guilty of desertion.

 

© Any person found guilty of desertion or attempt to desert shall be punished, if the offense is committed in time of war, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct, but if the desertion or attempt to desert occurs at any other time, by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial may direct.

 

Note: For specific details concerning this offense, including elements of proof, maximum punishments, and detailed explanation, see Punitive Articles of the UCMJ.

 

Oh, and the Talis that we released? Baddest of the bad. No question. I suppose I should be stunned that these guys ever saw the light of day again but I'm not. That's disappointing unto itself and speaks volumes to the state of this country today.

 

 

The president would also need to approve of the execution, I believe. I don't think that would happen either.

 

No question. With the political animals that have habitated DC for the last few decades? Suicidal.

Link to comment

Here is what Sen. McCain said in February:

 

COOPER: Would you oppose the idea of some form of negotiations or prisoner exchange? I know back in 2012 you called the idea of even negotiating with the Taliban bizarre, highly questionable.

McCAIN: Well, at that time the proposal was that they would release -- Taliban, some of them really hard-core, particularly five really hard-core Taliban leaders, as a confidence-building measure. Now this idea is for an exchange of prisoners for our American fighting man.

I would be inclined to support such a thing depending on a lot of the details. [...]

COOPER: So if there was some -- the possibility of some sort of exchange, that's something you would support?

 

McCAIN: I would support. Obviously I'd have to know the details, but I would support ways of bringing him home, and if exchange was one of them, I think that would be something I think we should seriously consider.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/03/bowe-bergdahl-release_n_5439644.html?1401826016

 

 

I'm sure no one will be surprised that he is singing a very different tune now. Someone needs to tell these GOP congresscritters that they don't have to reflexively turn 180 degrees just because President Obama agreed with them. Ridiculous.

 

So you're ignoring the fact where he said - twice - that it would depend on the details? To say nothing of the part where he said his previous opposition was based on who the exchange would be for which could be applicable here as well.

 

Edit: and the part where they cut the video right after he said the first "depending on a lot of the details" where McCain could have clarified it further.

Link to comment

So you're ignoring the fact where he said - twice - that it would depend on the details? To say nothing of the part where he said his previous opposition was based on who the exchange would be for which could be applicable here as well.

 

Edit: and the part where they cut the video right after he said the first "depending on a lot of the details" where McCain could have clarified it further.

Read it again. You're either willfully ignoring the gist of the entire statement or you're spinning like a top. Possibly both. (or genuinely missed the point I suppose?)
  • Fire 1
Link to comment

 

There is probably no right answer, but Obama's decision to trade for him had an eye on international politics and relations as well as tying up all loose ends in Afghanistan, rather than just "should we rescue him or not because he might be a deserter"

That's a good point. I wonder how much of a role our withdrawal from Afghanistan played in this? It was reported awhile back that Karzai had been negotiating with the Taliban over a peace agreement . . .

 

Sounds like you were on the right track tschu.

 

This paints a fuller picture: http://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/analysis-talks-bergdahl-release-had-wider-goal

Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...