Scanning magazines: What do they say about the Huskers?

[Branno]

 

 

 

I predict that Gregory will have a great year and enter the draft next spring and that the team will have 4 losses. There's really no reason to predict anything else at this point.

Yeah seriously. Any good will towards this program has been tapped. It's time to produce, and if they do, great. But it's myopic to assume anything will be different.

 

Isn't it equally myopic to assume things will stay the same? You know what happens when you assume, right?

 

Not really... you know the old saying. Once is a fluke, twice is a coincidence, three times is a trend. So what is 6? A continuation of that trend. That's not to say there HAS to be 4 losses. There could very well be a season of 1 loss or 6 losses. But if I were a betting man making a prediction, I would predict 4 losses.

 

 

You have to admit we've had some pretty bad luck for some of those seasons though.

 

Martinez getting hurt in the Mizzou game back in 2010, which affected him through 2011.

Losing Jared Crick for most of the season and Baker Steinkuhler before the CCG against Wiscy in 2012

Losing Martinez, half the offensive line, and multiple injuries to the receiving corps last season.

 

One of our biggest issues has been injuries. If we can stay healthy this year, I see no game on our schedule that is an obvious loss.

[Junior]

 

You have to admit we've had some pretty bad luck for some of those seasons though.

 

Martinez getting hurt in the Mizzou game back in 2010, which affected him through 2011.

Losing Jared Crick for most of the season and Baker Steinkuhler before the CCG against Wiscy in 2012

Losing Martinez, half the offensive line, and multiple injuries to the receiving corps last season.

 

One of our biggest issues has been injuries. If we can stay healthy this year, I see no game on our schedule that is an obvious loss.

 

 

 

Every team has injuries, its a fact of football. When I look at the schedule, I'm unsure about Miami. I haven't followed them closely enough to have a strong opinion, but it feels like a game we would lose the last few years. But if I had to put money on the games, I'd say we'll lose at MSU and lose at Wisconsin.

[Branno]

 

 

You have to admit we've had some pretty bad luck for some of those seasons though.

 

Martinez getting hurt in the Mizzou game back in 2010, which affected him through 2011.

Losing Jared Crick for most of the season and Baker Steinkuhler before the CCG against Wiscy in 2012

Losing Martinez, half the offensive line, and multiple injuries to the receiving corps last season.

 

One of our biggest issues has been injuries. If we can stay healthy this year, I see no game on our schedule that is an obvious loss.

 

 

 

Every team has injuries, its a fact of football. When I look at the schedule, I'm unsure about Miami. I haven't followed them closely enough to have a strong opinion, but it feels like a game we would lose the last few years. But if I had to put money on the games, I'd say we'll lose at MSU and lose at Wisconsin.

 

 

I get that every team needs to be able to deal with injuries, but we seem to have injuries occur in the worst positions at the worst times. I can't think of another team that has had the same bad luck we've seemed to have the past few years.

[Count 'Bility]

 

 

You have to admit we've had some pretty bad luck for some of those seasons though.

 

Martinez getting hurt in the Mizzou game back in 2010, which affected him through 2011.

Losing Jared Crick for most of the season and Baker Steinkuhler before the CCG against Wiscy in 2012

Losing Martinez, half the offensive line, and multiple injuries to the receiving corps last season.

 

One of our biggest issues has been injuries. If we can stay healthy this year, I see no game on our schedule that is an obvious loss.

 

 

 

Every team has injuries, its a fact of football. When I look at the schedule, I'm unsure about Miami. I haven't followed them closely enough to have a strong opinion, but it feels like a game we would lose the last few years. But if I had to put money on the games, I'd say we'll lose at MSU and lose at Wisconsin.

 

Not every team has to play without their 4 year, reigning conference player of the year, qb AND reigning all-american, 3 year starting lineman.

 

Yes, every team has injuries. Not every team has to deal with what we did a year ago. And those that did, well, they werent very good either (Florida, Georgia, and Mizzou2012 immediately come to mind).

[Saunders]

Every team has injuries, its a fact of football.

Yes but some are more serious than others.

[Junior]

 

Every team has injuries, its a fact of football.

Yes but some are more serious than others.

 

 

Yes, but if we want to declare that Nebraska's injuries were worse than every other top 25 team (or anything along those lines) someone will have to present hard data.

[Branno]

 

 

Every team has injuries, its a fact of football.

Yes but some are more serious than others.

 

 

Yes, but if we want to declare that Nebraska's injuries were worse than every other top 25 team (or anything along those lines) someone will have to present hard data.

 

 

Can you honestly name a team that had worse injuries than us last year? Georgia lost ONE player, we lost almost our entire offense.

[Redux]

 

 

You have to admit we've had some pretty bad luck for some of those seasons though.

 

Martinez getting hurt in the Mizzou game back in 2010, which affected him through 2011.

Losing Jared Crick for most of the season and Baker Steinkuhler before the CCG against Wiscy in 2012

Losing Martinez, half the offensive line, and multiple injuries to the receiving corps last season.

 

One of our biggest issues has been injuries. If we can stay healthy this year, I see no game on our schedule that is an obvious loss.

 

 

 

Every team has injuries, its a fact of football. When I look at the schedule, I'm unsure about Miami. I haven't followed them closely enough to have a strong opinion, but it feels like a game we would lose the last few years. But if I had to put money on the games, I'd say we'll lose at MSU and lose at Wisconsin.

Not every team has to play without their 4 year, reigning conference player of the year, qb AND reigning all-american, 3 year starting lineman.

 

Yes, every team has injuries. Not every team has to deal with what we did a year ago. And those that did, well, they werent very good either (Florida, Georgia, and Mizzou2012 immediately come to mind).

Agreed

[NUpolo8]

 

 

Every team has injuries, its a fact of football.

 

Yes but some are more serious than others.

Yes, but if we want to declare that Nebraska's injuries were worse than every other top 25 team (or anything along those lines) someone will have to present hard data.

They appear worse because we all focus on Nebraska more than any other team, for starters. And they may hit Nebraska harder because there appears to be a talent depth issue combined with an absence of getting the next man ready. This has been very glaring at the QB position.

[The Dude]

 

Yes, but if we want to declare that Nebraska's injuries were worse than every other top 25 team (or anything along those lines) someone will have to present hard data.

 

I pointed this out several months ago.

 

[Redux]

The fact we finished 9-4 with an SEC bowl win is why Im so excited for this year. Not hecause it was a huge accomplishement but because we did it with a bare cupboard on offense and a first year defense. No reason to think they wont be a completely better team this year.

[Redux]

 

 

 

Every team has injuries, its a fact of football.

Yes but some are more serious than others.

Yes, but if we want to declare that Nebraska's injuries were worse than every other top 25 team (or anything along those lines) someone will have to present hard data.

They appear worse because we all focus on Nebraska more than any other team, for starters. And they may hit Nebraska harder because there appears to be a talent depth issue combined with an absence of getting the next man ready. This has been very glaring at the QB position.

Yes we focus on Nebraska more than any other team but I bet as a whole our fanbase follows the rest of the country alot closer than most other fanbases. The shallow QB roster wasnt all the staffs fault either. A 4yr starter goes down so they prepare for the next year with the next guy and split time with the Senior walk on. How is that not "getting the next man ready"?

[NUpolo8]

 

 

 

 

Every team has injuries, its a fact of football.

Yes but some are more serious than others.

Yes, but if we want to declare that Nebraska's injuries were worse than every other top 25 team (or anything along those lines) someone will have to present hard data.

They appear worse because we all focus on Nebraska more than any other team, for starters. And they may hit Nebraska harder because there appears to be a talent depth issue combined with an absence of getting the next man ready. This has been very glaring at the QB position.

Yes we focus on Nebraska more than any other team but I bet as a whole our fanbase follows the rest of the country alot closer than most other fanbases. The shallow QB roster wasnt all the staffs fault either. A 4yr starter goes down so they prepare for the next year with the next guy and split time with the Senior walk on. How is that not "getting the next man ready"?

A shallow college football roster isn't the coaches fault,who's charged to recruit and fill his roster. Interesting.

 

They only got the next man ready with Armstrong because there was no other choice. In 2011 and 2012, Taylor took nearly every snap. In the past, Nebraska was able to get reps for more than just the starter. Problems happen when that doesn't occur. Look at the 2002 season as an example, Solich let Crouch build stats for his Heisman run in 01, and Lord was pretty green when he started, that was systemic throughout other positions on that squad, as they had abnormal "injury bug" year that year too.

 

Anyway, my rambling point is there needs to be a more proactive approach to getting guys time. Injuries happen. Always. Putting inexperienced guys in and then saying that's why we lost is pretty flimsy. Sure it's not ideal, but it's a "next man up" sport.

[cg_8]

To be fair, Georgia lost a couple talented WR's, and the backup RB, and Gurley was out a few games. I think Georgia could be comparable, but they had, as we did, a very disappointing season BECAUSE of it.

 

How about the freakin' loss of the starting QB as being one of (if not) THE most significant injury for any team. How many lost their starting QB's? We had a redshirt freshmen, who went 7-1 as starter, take his place.

 

Georgia is the only team I can think of that lost their starting QB. I am sure there's more but you can't just brush that off as "teams have injuries..." Heck, the Patriots missed out on the playoffs in 2008 when Tom Brady was out for the year.

[kchusker_chris]

 

You have to admit we've had some pretty bad luck for some of those seasons though.

 

 

you have to admit we've had some pretty spectacular luck for some those seasons though.

 

hail mary, refs against MSU, OSU backup QB, d. robinson injury, heisman QB Murray and entire receiving corp injured...