The General Election

[HuskerNation1]

 

Well her primary campaign strategy has been to demonize him rather than focus on how she will improve the lives of Americans.

Continuing to insist on things doesn't make them true.

 

You may like Trump's style, or his coif, or the way you imagine he'll adhere to Republican policies (he won't), but you can't seriously make the claim that Hillary somehow has less positive focus on issues than Trump, whose grasp on any sort of policy is tenuous at best.

 

 

It's the truth. Since the convention he has been laying out many policy solutions on a host of topics, whether its taxes and the economy, immigration, national security, etc.. Meanwhile, HIllary has spent little time discussing what she plans to do to make the country better, and has frankly spent more time raising money in order to run negative ads against Trump. Did you see the graph I showed laying out how much she has spent compared to him?

[HuskerNation1]

 

 

In what universe is calling Trump unfit for the presidency an "unforced error" ? Regardless of how he behaves in the debate, it doesn't take away all the sh#t behavior from before. Or the stupid thoughts he's had and words he's said. The "narrative" is exactly what has happened, in real life.

 

Well her primary campaign strategy has been to demonize him rather than focus on how she will improve the lives of Americans. She knows most voters believe the country is headed in the wrong direction, so she can't run on Obama's record. Yet because she was in Obama's cabinet and helped shape his foreign policy, she can't claim to be a change agent. So she has decided to go negative over and over and has spent $145 million compared to Trump who's spent less than $1 million from his own campaign. The debate is a way for both candidates to "clear the slate" so to speak and give voters a fresh look at them 1/1. It doesn't take away some of his past comments just as it won't take away Hillary's huge lies and poor record, but many voters have accepted that both candidates are less than ideal, so they are taking into account all the past baggage when viewing the debate.

 

Trump made a smart move in hiring Conway. Since hiring her, he has made 6 or 7 focused policy speeches and has tried to run a more balanced message of offering solutions while also attacking Hillary. I personally think Hillary should have focused more on policy solutions since the convention, but I think her team felt she would just coast to an election win.

 

Ummm...Obama's approval rating is definitely favorable. Foxnews and your obscure propaganda sources may say otherwise and paint a picture of gloom and doom, but the reality is most Americans do not live in fear of said organizations' produced terror.

 

 

He's been a lame duck most of the year, and Trump and Clinton both have high negatives, so it's not a surprise his approval ratings have gone up slightly. Now when he actually made news in July with the Iran ransom situation, his approval ratings tanked again back into the 40s. Meanwhile, poll after poll shows 65 to 70% believe this country is on the wrong track, and that has been consistent throughout his entire 2nd term. The 2 biggest items in his legacy...Obamacare and his Iran deal, are not things I hear HIllary talking about when she actually does talk about issues. If Americans really were not after change, why doesn't she run on Obamacare and the Obama foreign policy?

[HuskerNation1]

So Hillary has hinted at having Mark Cuban (a complete a*s) as her guest in the front row of the debate. As a response, Trump has indicated he may have Gennifer Flowers, one of BIll's former mistresses, as his guest. Won't that be awkward. If he's going to pick one of Bill's former women, he should go with the one he raped, Juanita Broaddrick.

[NM11046]

So Hillary has hinted at having Mark Cuban (a complete a*s) as her guest in the front row of the debate. As a response, Trump has indicated he may have Gennifer Flowers, one of BIll's former mistresses, as his guest. Won't that be awkward. If he's going to pick one of Bill's former women, he should go with the one he raped, Juanita Broaddrick.

 

Trump has had complete a**es in the front row of his appearances for the last 6 months. Why is he/you so scared of Cuban?

[HuskerNation1]

 

So Hillary has hinted at having Mark Cuban (a complete a*s) as her guest in the front row of the debate. As a response, Trump has indicated he may have Gennifer Flowers, one of BIll's former mistresses, as his guest. Won't that be awkward. If he's going to pick one of Bill's former women, he should go with the one he raped, Juanita Broaddrick.

 

Trump has had complete a**es in the front row of his appearances for the last 6 months. Why is he/you so scared of Cuban?

 

 

I don't think anyone is scared...I just think it's funny to watch the pre-debate back and forth already taking place. I would have no issue with Cuban and Flowers both being their side by side...would you have an issue with one of Bill's former mistresses that Hillary trashed publicly to be in the front row?

[HuskerNation1]

Says something when the big money/big company guys who are typically strong republican leans don't support their candidate, and those who are talking are supporting Hillary:

 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/no-fortune-100-ceos-back-republican-donald-trump-1474671842

 

Yes, Hillary is the candidate of Wall Street and big donors. It's crazy how things have flipped between the two parties where the GOP is now viewed as the party of the average person and the Democrats are the party of the elites.

[NM11046]

 

Says something when the big money/big company guys who are typically strong republican leans don't support their candidate, and those who are talking are supporting Hillary:

 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/no-fortune-100-ceos-back-republican-donald-trump-1474671842

 

Yes, Hillary is the candidate of Wall Street and big donors. It's crazy how things have flipped between the two parties where the GOP is now viewed as the party of the average person and the Democrats are the party of the elites.

 

I don't think it's a matter of elite vs. average man. Plenty of evidence against that. It's a matter of people putting this country ahead of their own personal gain.

[Danny Bateman]

I'm sure the Commission on Presidential Debates is mildly annoyed with the sideshow that this invitee storyline has become. It probably won't affect either person too much. It's just really trashy of Trump to invite Flowers. I think it also speaks to how insecure he is that he immediately had to rip into Cuban and pull a stunt like this. Hopefully, suburban women are as repulsed by his lack of any class as I am.

I do find it humorous that so many people seem to put their faith in Trump as the savior of the working man and the average Joe. Or that he's a successful businessman. Obama said it best... "Really? This is the guy you want championing working people?

 

He inherited a crapload of money and his company from his Dad, built it up with questionable business practices, chiefly multiple bankruptcies and stiffing lots of contractors and regular employees working for him. He apparently has issues staying out of hock, with the bankruptcies, an illegal loan where his father basically bought $3.5M worth of chips from his casino and didn't use them, and has been caught multiple times spending charity money on personal expenses.

 

There's credible reason to believe he's ind eat to China and/or Russia, and keeps coming up with new reasons to not release his tax returns for any transparency on any of this.

We have no idea how much he's actually worth, but we do know that he lies about THAT a lot, and that his net worth fluctuates "with his feelings."

 

On top of all that, he's clearly running a thinly veiled white nationalist campaign, and he appears to be a massively insecure, impulsive dick.

What about that screams that he's a working class hero? Maybe someone can help me out. Is it that he's got the R next to his name, or that he's not Clinton?

[QMany]

So Hillary has hinted at having Mark Cuban (a complete a*s) as her guest in the front row of the debate. As a response, Trump has indicated he may have Gennifer Flowers, one of BIll's former mistresses, as his guest. Won't that be awkward. If he's going to pick one of Bill's former women, he should go with the one he raped, Juanita Broaddrick.

Did Hillary invite Trump's rape victim?

[mrandyk]

 

So Hillary has hinted at having Mark Cuban (a complete a*s) as her guest in the front row of the debate. As a response, Trump has indicated he may have Gennifer Flowers, one of BIll's former mistresses, as his guest. Won't that be awkward. If he's going to pick one of Bill's former women, he should go with the one he raped, Juanita Broaddrick.

Did Hillary invite Trump's rape victim?

 

Trick question. It's impossible to rape your spouse.

[NM11046]

Pretty much sums it up - NYTimes Opinion Piece:

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/26/opinion/why-donald-trump-should-not-be-president.html?smid=fb-nytopinion&smtyp=cur

[Danny Bateman]

It seems that story I posted a while back about Trump soliciting non-US citizens for donations to his campaign had a bit of a development.

 

 

That's the former president of Mexico and an outspoken Trump critic. How did a fundraising email wind up in his inbox?

Seriously, how stupid and incompetent are the people running his campaign?

[zoogs]

He probably signed up for it himself to create a nice Twitter slam.

 

Unfortunately, he forgot to bring spell check.

[HuskerNation1]

 

So Hillary has hinted at having Mark Cuban (a complete a*s) as her guest in the front row of the debate. As a response, Trump has indicated he may have Gennifer Flowers, one of BIll's former mistresses, as his guest. Won't that be awkward. If he's going to pick one of Bill's former women, he should go with the one he raped, Juanita Broaddrick.

Did Hillary invite Trump's rape victim?

 

 

And who was that...his ex-wife who admitted she lied about that? There is no comparison between what Bill Clinton did to many women and Trump.

What's worse is that Hillary led the effort to attack these women who were victims of her husbands. Earlier this year she made a statement at a rally that "every victim has a right to be heard," and when Juanita Broaddrick called out this statement that appears on Hillary's website, it suddenly was taken down from the website.

[HuskerNation1]

 

 

Says something when the big money/big company guys who are typically strong republican leans don't support their candidate, and those who are talking are supporting Hillary:

 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/no-fortune-100-ceos-back-republican-donald-trump-1474671842

 

Yes, Hillary is the candidate of Wall Street and big donors. It's crazy how things have flipped between the two parties where the GOP is now viewed as the party of the average person and the Democrats are the party of the elites.

 

I don't think it's a matter of elite vs. average man. Plenty of evidence against that. It's a matter of people putting this country ahead of their own personal gain.

 

 

What in the heck does your statement mean? And where is the evidence that Trump is taking in more big donors than Hillary? Bernie supporters were furious with Hillary as they considered her the ultimate candidate of Wall Street and the elites.