Jump to content


NFL 2016


Mavric

Recommended Posts



Im a Chiefs, so obviously there's a little bias in this. But moreso it's just curiousity, that in all actuality, wouldnt be there had this involve anyone else but the Chiefs.

 

I heard two different converstations on radio yesterday about where the Raiders stand in terms of NFL's best. Pretty extensive debates. But no mention of the Chiefs AT ALL in the midst of this discussion that spanned across 5 different teams. And Im just a little confused. The Chiefs have the same record as the Raiders. Have dealt with a butt load of injuries from running backs, olineman, quarterback, secondary, etc. And the biggest kicker? The Chiefs beat the Raiders. Face to face. On the road. Quite handily. So i'm just curious about this. Mostly i dont pay in depth attn the NFL as a whole outside of the Chiefs. So someone who does could maybe educate on what the logic is here. Could it simply be that the Raiders have been so bad for so long that it's just a new factor?

  • Fire 2
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...