What did we learn-Wyoming edition

[BRV920]

That's why I said most likely Elf or did you miss that. You guys can make all the excuses you want for the call but it still doesn't make it a good one.

[BRV920]

The one thing I know for sure was that we got zero points out of that drive because we threw it.

[Mavric]

We also get points if TA throws the ball into the 30th row on the first three plays. The pass option was not a bad decision by the staff. If TA throws the ball away. We have 2nd down. Now the defense has to start thinking are we going to pass again or run? NU runs the ball on each consecutive play until we score with a defense that is 50/50 r/p. Nothing wrong with that thinking - execution ruined the drive.

 

How many more times does he have to make bad decisions before they realize they can't trust him to throw the ball away if it's not there?

[Mavric]

 

 

The run game's struggles today also surprised me. To an extent Wyoming were just selling out vs the run, right? -- which also explains the silly extent to which they were punished through the air.But certainly I think we'd like to see something better out of the ground attack. If other teams can also shut down the run and take their chances with the pass, they'll likely have greater success than a 7-point game heading into the 4th. And it doesn't take a top-tier B1G team to fall into that category.

The biggest thing that would help our run game is to call some play other than running straight into the middle of the line.

 

 

They were called, but they used Ozigbo instead of Newby. Commentators even called the coaches out on it at one point.

 

Though considering how weak Oregon is against the run (see last night's game vs. VA), could some of this be not wanting to show too much on film?

 

 

I was at the game so I don't know what the commentators said. Glad they at least pointed that out.

 

Ozigbo may have gotten a couple outside carries but he was mostly stuck going straight ahead as well - though that's not as bad of a choice with a big back.

[GBRFAN]

So we should never call a pass play because if the results aren't positive it was bad play calling. Guessing after a couple games of throwing zero passes the defense may put 11 in the box. Hope we don't fumble another handoff because that takes away the RB - then again we did fumble the exchange from center to QB. Those coaches - can't believe they called a play where we actually snapped the ball. Don't they understand that we need to stick to the playbook that fits our strengths.

[GBRFAN]

The one thing I know for sure was that we got zero points out of that drive because we threw it.

 

you are correct, however TA does have 57 or more passing TD's so we could use that arguement to counter your bold statement. Wonder what our 4 year record would be if TA had zero passing TD's? Or zero passing yards?

[GBRFAN]

 

We also get points if TA throws the ball into the 30th row on the first three plays. The pass option was not a bad decision by the staff. If TA throws the ball away. We have 2nd down. Now the defense has to start thinking are we going to pass again or run? NU runs the ball on each consecutive play until we score with a defense that is 50/50 r/p. Nothing wrong with that thinking - execution ruined the drive.

 

How many more times does he have to make bad decisions before they realize they can't trust him to throw the ball away if it's not there?

 

 

So we are going to abandon the forward pass - interesting!!!

 

Mav you are a smart person - please don't suggest such a thing.

[Mavric]

So we should never call a pass play because if the results aren't positive it was bad play calling. Guessing after a couple games of throwing zero passes the defense may put 11 in the box. Hope we don't fumble another handoff because that takes away the RB - then again we did fumble the exchange from center to QB. Those coaches - can't believe they called a play where we actually snapped the ball. Don't they understand that we need to stick to the playbook that fits our strengths.

 

I assume you enjoy arguing against straw men.

[BRV920]

Are you delusional GBR? Not saying that we shouldn't throw the ball. Saying that was a terrible play call. If Riley really wants to be a running team isn't that the perfect time to impose your will on a weaker opponent? The funny thing is people are worried about almost interceptions but are fine with Langsdorf calling 36 pass plays. Makes very little sense.

[GBRFAN]

 

 

We also get points if TA throws the ball into the 30th row on the first three plays. The pass option was not a bad decision by the staff. If TA throws the ball away. We have 2nd down. Now the defense has to start thinking are we going to pass again or run? NU runs the ball on each consecutive play until we score with a defense that is 50/50 r/p. Nothing wrong with that thinking - execution ruined the drive.

 

How many more times does he have to make bad decisions before they realize they can't trust him to throw the ball away if it's not there?

 

 

So we are going to abandon the forward pass - interesting!!!

 

Mav you are a smart person - please don't suggest such a thing.

 

 

Straw men??? How about - I enjoy arguing about Dumb a** post. You made a comment that we can't trust him to pass because he will not throw the ball away. Which suggest that throwing the ball is not an option for TA... That is a solid comment on your part.

[BRV920]

You must argue with yourself a lot then because your stuff is borderline jibberish.

[The Dude]

Anyone know how many of our passes were off of run action? Seemed like a high number, and it seemed successful.

[GBRFAN]

Are you delusional GBR? Not saying that we shouldn't throw the ball. Saying that was a terrible play call. If Riley really wants to be a running team isn't that the perfect time to impose your will on a weaker opponent? The funny thing is people are worried about almost interceptions but are fine with Langsdorf calling 36 pass plays. Makes very little sense.

 

as mentioned in my post above the pass is a smart play becuase it pulls the defenses mind away from the run. If the play isn't open (unsucessful) then the next two plays the defense is wondering if we will pass or run - meaning they have to be balanced instead of sending all 11 for the run. Not the only call that could have been made, however not a bad call either - poor execution by a guy that had a pretty solid game. It would be nice to have oregon next week in the same spot - 1st and goal at the 4. Now they will be thinking is TA going to guide a running play or a passing play???? Being unpredictable isn't a bad thing as long as the execution is acceptable.

[GBRFAN]

You must argue with yourself a lot then because your stuff is borderline jibberish.

 

I pictured you being in about 10th grade, however i now feel like i gave you the benefit of about 4 years.

[Mavric]

 

 

We also get points if TA throws the ball into the 30th row on the first three plays. The pass option was not a bad decision by the staff. If TA throws the ball away. We have 2nd down. Now the defense has to start thinking are we going to pass again or run? NU runs the ball on each consecutive play until we score with a defense that is 50/50 r/p. Nothing wrong with that thinking - execution ruined the drive.

 

How many more times does he have to make bad decisions before they realize they can't trust him to throw the ball away if it's not there?

 

 

So we are going to abandon the forward pass - interesting!!!

 

Mav you are a smart person - please don't suggest such a thing.

 

 

Yeah, that's not anything close to what I said.

 

Continue with your straw men, though.