Landlord Posted November 1, 2018 Share Posted November 1, 2018 "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This does seem pretty clear......ly to have nothing at all to do with individual private citizens' ownership of guns. 1 Link to comment
TGHusker Posted November 1, 2018 Author Share Posted November 1, 2018 On 10/30/2018 at 10:03 AM, QMany said: No some of us just think Trump speaks out of both ends and as no idea what he is talking about. He is hardly worth responding to (Trump that is). But no he has no chance to overturn the 14th or 're-interpret' it. The only time Trump is interested in the constitution is when he can use it to rally his base - then he is misusing it.. 1 Link to comment
Ric Flair Posted November 2, 2018 Share Posted November 2, 2018 So if the Democrats REALLY think that Kavanaugh is a gang rapist/sexual predator, how come they quit talking about it entirely? It’s ALMOST like they knew it was complete BS and were willing to go along with it and destroy a good man so long as it could possibly help them politically. And then once it was unsuccessful, they forgot all about it. 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted November 2, 2018 Share Posted November 2, 2018 12 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: So if the Democrats REALLY think that Kavanaugh is a gang rapist/sexual predator, how come they quit talking about it entirely? It’s ALMOST like they knew it was complete BS and were willing to go along with it and destroy a good man so long as it could possibly help them politically. And then once it was unsuccessful, they forgot all about it. Maybe because there is nothing they can do about without a majority, maybe because Ford said she wasn't going to pursue it any further, maybe because they'll let Bert show his true colors, maybe because literally none of them called him a gang rapist/ or sexual predator... 4 Link to comment
Landlord Posted November 2, 2018 Share Posted November 2, 2018 2 hours ago, ZRod said: Maybe because there is nothing they can do about without a majority, maybe because Ford said she wasn't going to pursue it any further, maybe because they'll let Bert show his true colors, maybe because literally none of them called him a gang rapist/ or sexual predator... And also because we're all drawn along by the media and have been successfully distracted by the next round of outrageous stories to spend our energy on. Link to comment
Ric Flair Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 On 11/1/2018 at 9:02 PM, ZRod said: Maybe because there is nothing they can do about without a majority, maybe because Ford said she wasn't going to pursue it any further, maybe because they'll let Bert show his true colors, maybe because literally none of them called him a gang rapist/ or sexual predator... Lame response. They treated the allegations seriously and said they would not confirm him because of them. They raised holy hell when the Republicans voted for him anyway. They said they believed Kavanaugh’s accusers...what does that indicate they believe about Kavanaugh? And yet now we hear crickets. Their lies to destroy a good man failed. They never believed them at all. Link to comment
commando Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 43 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: Lame response. They treated the allegations seriously and said they would not confirm him because of them. They raised holy hell when the Republicans voted for him anyway. They said they believed Kavanaugh’s accusers...what does that indicate they believe about Kavanaugh? And yet now we hear crickets. Their lies to destroy a good man failed. They never believed them at all. lame response. 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 12 hours ago, Ric Flair said: Lame response. They treated the allegations seriously and said they would not confirm him because of them. They raised holy hell when the Republicans voted for him anyway. They said they believed Kavanaugh’s accusers...what does that indicate they believe about Kavanaugh? And yet now we hear crickets. Their lies to destroy a good man failed. They never believed them at all. Should they not take allegations of sexual misconduct seriously? I wouldn't confirm him either after he threw a temper tantrum in front of the entire nation and let everyone know that he was not an impartial justice. The Republicans said they believe Kavanaugh's accuser as well, what doea that indicate that they believe about Bert, but aren't willing to say in public? Surely you know how politics work during election cycles professor. Link to comment
Ric Flair Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 1 hour ago, ZRod said: Should they not take allegations of sexual misconduct seriously? I wouldn't confirm him either after he threw a temper tantrum in front of the entire nation and let everyone know that he was not an impartial justice. The Republicans said they believe Kavanaugh's accuser as well, what doea that indicate that they believe about Bert, but aren't willing to say in public? Surely you know how politics work during election cycles professor. Are they credible allegations? Is there anything to support or substantiate them? Are the accusers crazy or politically motivated? Quote Committee investigators began investigating Ms. Munro-Leighton’s allegations. Given her relatively unique name, Committee investigators were able to use open-source research to locate Ms. Munro-Leighton and determine that she: (1) is a left-wing activist; (2) is decades older than Judge Kavanaugh; and (3) lives in neither the Washington DC area nor California, but in Kentucky. … In short, during the Committee’s time-sensitive investigation of allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, Ms. Munro-Leighton submitted a fabricated allegation, which diverted Committee resources. When questioned by Committee investigators she admitted it was false, a “ploy,” and a “tactic.” She was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation. DEMOCLOWNS OWE JUSTICE KAVANAUGH AN APOLOGY 1 1 Link to comment
commando Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 who was that womnan....i recall the name of the main accuser ford...and there were a couple others that were dismissed early...was she 1 of those? Link to comment
ZRod Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 3 hours ago, Ric Flair said: Are they credible allegations? Is there anything to support or substantiate them? Are the accusers crazy or politically motivated? DEMOCLOWNS OWE JUSTICE KAVANAUGH AN APOLOGY I'm sorry, I don't recall them bringing anyone forward except for Dr. Ford, who's allegations were outstanding enough to warrant review if you are an honest human being. 3 Link to comment
commando Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 4 hours ago, Ric Flair said: Are they credible allegations? Is there anything to support or substantiate them? Are the accusers crazy or politically motivated? DEMOCLOWNS OWE JUSTICE KAVANAUGH AN APOLOGY lol....you linked a breitbart article. now i know where you get your fake news. 1 Link to comment
Ric Flair Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 15 minutes ago, commando said: lol....you linked a breitbart article. now i know where you get your fake news. Is it wrong? Of course not. But when you can’t dispute the message, you attack the messenger. Predictable. Democrats knew Kavanaugh was innocent. They simply didn’t care. 1 Link to comment
commando Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 59 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: Is it wrong? Of course not. But when you can’t dispute the message, you attack the messenger. Predictable. Democrats knew Kavanaugh was innocent. They simply didn’t care. big jump from 1 potential liar to all women are liars. and breitbart is as respectable as the national enquirer. find a better source to link to. not saying your info is bad...just your source. 3 Link to comment
Ric Flair Posted November 4, 2018 Share Posted November 4, 2018 6 hours ago, commando said: big jump from 1 potential liar to all women are liars. and breitbart is as respectable as the national enquirer. find a better source to link to. not saying your info is bad...just your source. Who said all women are liars? I certainly didn’t. If you think the article is wrong, then argue the point. Attacking the source because you don’t like their politics is just dumb. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts