Creighton Duke

Haha...I respectfully beg to differ with the quoted. With those traps he looks more like he should be starting at OLB or SS than coaching! Dude has kept himself in outstanding shape.

Yeah, Jesus is right. You know you're in "great sources" territory when CD is exuberant. Here's a WaPo article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/10/28/the-war-over-words-literally-on-some-american-campuses-where-asking-where-are-you-from-is-a-microaggression/ I tend to agree with this from the closing paragraph: You definitely confused(?) my alleged "exuberance" with genuine surprise. Please don't mischaracterize me like that.

Black Pigeon Speaks makes it to Huskerboard. Man, what a world!

Other than the fact that he has money and influence, what don't you like about Soros? Plenty of info about that parasite on the web. I'm not asking the internet. I'm asking you. A desire to meddle in global affairs in order to create uncertainty and fear in a world that is destablized, creating investment opportunities for him to exploit (as he has done numerous times in the past). A real-world Emperor Palpatine

Ex-Nebraska quarterback Johnny Stanton to start for UNLV in season opener Really nice to see this. I was always high on Stanton and thought it was too bad that he didn't work out at Nebraska. Hopefully he does well in Barney's offense.

I don't really understand why people make a big deal out of people or organizations engaging in legal activities that go against their own beliefs or values. If you have a problem with this type of activity don't watch the game. The NFL has taken a nose dive in recent years with endless PSAs and other objectionable activity to the point where I simply refuse to watch it any more. If you have a problem with something, vote with your feet, eyes, and dollars. That being said, I think that there is much more to the story than Kap "truly" wanting to make a statement. I think he is trying to protect his own hide. He knows that he is on the verge of being cut, but if he makes this kind of "statement" and THEN gets cut, he and millions of others will cry foul and try to link the cutting back to this stunt. As much as I don't care for this kind of activity nor the message it spreads to impressionable parties...

Nothing to see here folks! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3648743/Jury-finds-Vanderbilt-football-player-Brandon-Vandenburg-GUILTY-raping-girl-dorm-room.html

Haha....yep. Definitely didn't watch the movie.

The reason why I ask is not because I don't know what it means, but more so to get an idea of the broad brush that is used to paint so many people and so many Trump supporters. If you look at some of my posts on previous voting decisions, I am anything but consistent and I find it interesting that those with differing or dissenting opinions who draw conclusions from a myriad of different sources (although not Vox...never Vox) to be lumped into one particular category. It would be like my saying that since you cite certain media outlets that you are trying to legitimize Palpatine (Soros).

Wow, that is pure Obama/DNC spin. Obama's own spokesperson admitted yesterday the release of the hostages was contingent upon arrival of the money. Hot dog! Let's hope that China never gets any U.S hostages. At $1.2 trillion, that would require...well...this

"alt-right"? Please explain, if you don't mind. Also, what do you think of my new signature??!!

I think they will. Between primary numbers and rally turnouts, some people are going to be pretty overwhelmed at the disparity on election day. It has been consistently shown that primary numbers and rally turnouts are not at all indicative of election day turnout. You have your models and I have mine. We'll see what happens in a few months. What are you basing your models on? Here's some info on primary numbers and rally turnouts. I don't base them on Nate Silver or...Bernie supporters.

Nice spin. Trump is the only Presidential candidate giving this Katrina like tragedy the attention it deserves. Meanwhile Obama is having a great time golfing. As i pointed out in the other thread, a prime example of the MSM showing its bias and hypocrisy as they chastised Bush for not showing up or seeming engaged enough with Katrina. http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-drennen/2016/08/18/nets-compare-louisiana-flood-katrina-ignore-obama-vacation

I think they will. Between primary numbers and rally turnouts, some people are going to be pretty overwhelmed at the disparity on election day. It has been consistently shown that primary numbers and rally turnouts are not at all indicative of election day turnout. You have your models and I have mine. We'll see what happens in a few months. In the meantime, can we also add "stopping someone who seems mean!" and "electing someone who doesn't hurt my feels" to the list (in addition to my suggestion of "I'm not voting")? This can cover people who are only casually following the race. I know it seems like a joke, but...ya know!

I could care less if the groupthink going on in here matters. If you don't think there is any liberal bias in the MSM, that is naive, but you can continue to believe that. As I said above, they do not create the liberal bias in the MSM but simply call it out. I have said the MSM does a better job disguising their bias, but a bias is still there.

I think they will. Between primary numbers and rally turnouts, some people are going to be pretty overwhelmed at the disparity on election day.