huskersurfer Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Reading the article on Husker Extra they say that Nebraska had 50 redshirts this year. The most in the country! Anyone know about how many teams usually redshirt! Having that large number of redshirt freshman next year has to be a huge advantage for the team next year. See article HERE Quote Link to comment
huskernumerouno Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 I would think it would make us better Quote Link to comment
skersfan Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 I can see it both ways. A chance to grow up a little bit, but also the fact that we are not getting Freshman that ready to play right away. That also is a lot of players with no field experience going into next year. I can see it as a positive and a negative. We really won't know until next season. Quote Link to comment
papersun87 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Pelini is copying from Doc Sadler. Quote Link to comment
BaytownHusker Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Doesnt that also mean alot of kids that are not got to make the team??? Quote Link to comment
junior4949 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 I can see it both ways. A chance to grow up a little bit, but also the fact that we are not getting Freshman that ready to play right away. That also is a lot of players with no field experience going into next year. I can see it as a positive and a negative. We really won't know until next season. Maybe I read it wrong, but I got the impression that those 50 players are already on the team this year practicing. They do at least have one year within the college system under their belts. Quote Link to comment
np_husker Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 A wealth of redshirted playersNebraska has played only three true freshmen this season -- Alfonzo Dennard, Mason Wald and walk-on Matt Holt. (Cameron Meredith and Sean Fisher each appeared in one game, but Husker coaches are hoping they're given medical redshirts). So, all told, Nebraska will end up redshirting nearly 50 players in the class of 2008. I included this statistic in a column today as an example of what I see as stability in the Husker program. "It may not always be like that here," defensive coordinator Carl Pelini said of the high number of redshirts. "We just felt it was important this year to do that and develop those guys. Now, in hindsight, you're really glad you did it. And I think it's going to mean good things for this program as time goes on." The high number of redshirts can be traced in part to having new coaches installing new systems. "We felt like this year being our first year -- the system was new on defense, and a lot of new wrinkles on offense -- that we needed to focus primarily on our veterans and their development within the system," Carl Pelini explained. "It was quite literally hard to get enough work to those young guys." Now that the older players are versed in the system, "You can have a little more time with the young guys," Pelini said. "And maybe each year there are more and more of those true freshmen that end up playing for you." Nebraska's class of 2008 included about 30 walk-ons. Will the Huskers have that many walk-ons in every class? "That's something we have to talk about," Pelini said. "It really comes down to a question of numbers and facilities and what we can handle. Shoot, you'd love to take 30 every year. But after four years, you'd have a small army out there and you wouldn't have enough lockers for the players." http://journalstar.com/blog/huskers.php?ti...p;tb=1&pb=1 Quote Link to comment
huskersurfer Posted December 16, 2008 Author Share Posted December 16, 2008 I can see it both ways. A chance to grow up a little bit, but also the fact that we are not getting Freshman that ready to play right away. That also is a lot of players with no field experience going into next year. I can see it as a positive and a negative. We really won't know until next season. I see how it can be a negative but I think having a player 100% ready to see the field is better than sending a guy out to play when he isn't ready just so he can have on the field experience. These redshirts will see the field with confidence that has been gained from practice. Quote Link to comment
WVhuskerXX Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 i really like the idea for THIS year...i dont think we will see this every year...i think more and more true freshman will play in the coming years Quote Link to comment
DCHusker Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 I can see it both ways. A chance to grow up a little bit, but also the fact that we are not getting Freshman that ready to play right away. That also is a lot of players with no field experience going into next year. I can see it as a positive and a negative. We really won't know until next season. I see how it can be a negative but I think having a player 100% ready to see the field is better than sending a guy out to play when he isn't ready just so he can have on the field experience. These redshirts will see the field with confidence that has been gained from practice. Although one could make the argument that no one is ever 100% ready to see the field until they actually see the field for a while. There's a difference between being as best prepared as you can before seeing the field and being 100% ready. I have no problem redshirting players until they've learned all they can outside of playing on Saturdays. Quote Link to comment
SkullandBones Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 I always go with the axiom 'Bo knows best'. Outside of that logic I don't see it as being a bad thing. I can't see this being the norm, but for the current time and situation, why not? Have to see how it plays out I guess. Quote Link to comment
skersfan Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 I agree Bo knows best. The only draw back that I see is that the freshman we are recruiting are not the impact playes others may be getting. I do not see it as a major hurdle by any means. We have to understand we are not going to get those highly sought after recruits that are capable of playing as a true freshman, on a regular basis. At least not at this time. Quote Link to comment
Husker_x Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Pelini's establishing longevity. He's playing for the future, not the present. I don't think we'll see this every year, but for his first year in, to lay the groundwork for the program he envisions, this strikes me as a smart move. Get as many kids physically ready to play at the D-1 level, and then slowly but surely leak them onto the field on Saturday. Now we have 50 guys who are a year into Dobson's training program, a year into Pelini's scheme or Watson's playbook, practicing with other D1 athletes, and with four full years of playing time ahead of them. I guess I don't see the downside, unless we have Reggie Bush on our depth chart and nobody knows it yet. Quote Link to comment
billdozer15 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 This is awesome. It can only help the program in the long run. Our depth will be much improved. Which after seeing this year we are in great need of. P.S. TURNER GILL JUST TURNED DOWN ISU. My condolences Cy. Tell pollard to give me a ring, I play a mean game on PS3. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.