flatwaterfan Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 I would like to see how this lineup would do against Wisconsin Meredith Crick Baker Carter Compton David Stafford (nickel) Evans (CB) Dennard(CB) PJ Osborne I think Carter needs to get more time. Ankrah and Williams have been adequate but it seems like Carter has been factoring in more when he plays. I would like to see Carter get more time against Wisconsin, otherwise I would say get Randall or Moore in as a DT and slide Crick to RE. Also want to see the bigger safeties play. Not sure what to do with Fish. The 4-3 would be good to play against Wisconsin but I want Stafford on the field. I am not sure how strong FIsh has been. If Fish is in I want Stafford to take Osborne's spot. Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 My least favorite players on the defense are Green and Cassidy. Cassidy gave up a late touchdown but then again he really shouldn't have been covering someone who's a better athlete than he is. That play was just too easy to watch for Wyoming. Quote Link to comment
Husker Richard Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 After T-Mo's performance last night, I'd say put him in over Baker. Quote Link to comment
HuskerfaninOkieland Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 After T-Mo's performance last night, I'd say put him in over Baker. I thought Baker had a pretty decent game last night Quote Link to comment
BIG ERN Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 I would like to see how this lineup would do against Wisconsin Meredith Crick Baker Carter Compton David Stafford (nickel) Evans (CB) Dennard(CB) PJ Osborne I think Carter needs to get more time. Ankrah and Williams have been adequate but it seems like Carter has been factoring in more when he plays. I would like to see Carter get more time against Wisconsin, otherwise I would say get Randall or Moore in as a DT and slide Crick to RE. Also want to see the bigger safeties play. Not sure what to do with Fish. The 4-3 would be good to play against Wisconsin but I want Stafford on the field. I am not sure how strong FIsh has been. If Fish is in I want Stafford to take Osborne's spot. I fully agree here. Quote Link to comment
BigWillie Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Ankrah is a waste and doesn't even deserve time as a backup for his play. He was given a golden opportunity as a starter, and has stunk the joint up. He is a big reason for our bad line play early. But I should also note that none of his backups are looking great either. Fish deserves to ride the bench as well. Besides taking up space, he does very little. Slow to react, slow to the ball, and cannot take on blocks. I still do not understand why Roach wasn't given more of a chance over Fish. Quote Link to comment
Overland Park Husker Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 I'd like to know how Thorrell sees the field. He hasn't done much besides miss assignments. Is there no one better? Quote Link to comment
Husker Richard Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 I'd like to know how Thorrell sees the field. He hasn't done much besides miss assignments. Is there no one better? Take your pick: Blatchford, Green, Thorrell..... Quote Link to comment
EZ-E Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 I'd like to know how Thorrell sees the field. He hasn't done much besides miss assignments. Is there no one better? Take your pick: Blatchford, Green, Thorrell..... I personally will not accept that Thorrell is better than Green, Cooper, Mitchell, or even Harvey Jackson. I will not accept that Blatchford is better than a one of them either. Really wish Mitchell and Cooper were given more experience in our first few games. Green, Evans, Mitchell, and Cooper will all be very good football players for us. Terrence Moore would probably start at any other school in the conference. We are a solid two deep at DT. Hopefully Crick is allowed to shoot gaps which is his strength. He very seldom gets credit for keeping the other team's OL off our LBs. He leaves Compton and Lavonte free a lot. Lavonte did better this past week at playing his assignment. Quote Link to comment
Overland Park Husker Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 I'd like to know how Thorrell sees the field. He hasn't done much besides miss assignments. Is there no one better? Take your pick: Blatchford, Green, Thorrell..... I'll take Green over Thorrell and maybe even over Evans. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 doesn't look like anyone likes any of our backers.......yet we expect them to hold off Wisconsin? Quote Link to comment
bleedNUred Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 doesn't look like anyone likes any of our backers.......yet we expect them to hold off Wisconsin? We all love David, but the others have yet to impress. Quote Link to comment
HuskerNMO Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I would love to see Crick slide out to DE against Wisconsin and a front line of Cam, Baker, T-Mo and Crick, makes us more physical which will be needed against them. I don't think we need much dime this week, so hopefully Blatchford and Thorell aren't needed as much. Quote Link to comment
Forge Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I would liek to see... DE - Cam DT - Crick DT - T-Mo DT - Baker DE - Carter LB - David LB - Compton CB - Dennard CB - Evans FS - PJ SS - Stafford Yep, I said it. Run a 5-2. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.