My Take on the Game

[AFhusker]

It comes down to how well our OL can block their DL that happens to be the best in the country. If they don't then Taylor will get pummeled and will likely turn the ball over since NU is statistically the worst ball security team in the country and we will get taken behind the woodshed.

 

I hope Beck comes up with a good game plan for that DL because we are going to need to out coach USC because we don't' have the talent on the OL to match up with them.

You know what's awesome? Facts.

 

http://www.cfbstats....y12/sort04.html

 

But who cares about those when you can just make sh#t up.

 

Those don't count fumbles of our own that we recover. If you think that our offense has great ball security, I have some ocean front property outside of Omaha that I want to sell you. And before you say that those don't matter because they are not turnovers, they still kill drives because they put us in 2nd or 3rd and long with a QB that can't throw, therefore it still kills our drive.

But the other teams don't have those recorded either, so your point is moot and irrelevant.

 

[HuskerShark]

It comes down to how well our OL can block their DL that happens to be the best in the country. If they don't then Taylor will get pummeled and will likely turn the ball over since NU is statistically the worst ball security team in the country and we will get taken behind the woodshed.

 

I hope Beck comes up with a good game plan for that DL because we are going to need to out coach USC because we don't' have the talent on the OL to match up with them.

I agree with you, and I think from the games against the best D-Lines we have faced this year, we should be encouraged. Vs. MSU, we were told all week that their D-Line was too big, too fast, too good. I don't think it is a stretch to say that we ran over them.

 

Then against PSU, Devon Still really is one of the best DT's in the country, and he was disruptive a couple of times, but overall, we moved the ball very well against a really good PSU D-Line. I'm taking the wait-and -see approach on this one.

[True2tRA]

My take on the game.........I have no take. I have no expectations for this years football team. Until we find some consistency at every position I refuse to buy into this team. I've had my hopes up pretty high this year due to all the off season hype the world put out there. It was all crap. Burkhead, David, and Dennard are the only consistent players on this team. Everyone else has a long ways to go. I expect us to play. I don't expect us to play hard. If we do I'll be happy. Washington showed us last year though, that we cannot expect our team to be pumped up for bowl games. We just never know.

[Hunter94]

My take on the game.........I have no take. I have no expectations for this years football team. Until we find some consistency at every position I refuse to buy into this team. I've had my hopes up pretty high this year due to all the off season hype the world put out there. It was all crap. Burkhead, David, and Dennard are the only consistent players on this team. Everyone else has a long ways to go. I expect us to play. I don't expect us to play hard. If we do I'll be happy. Washington showed us last year though, that we cannot expect our team to be pumped up for bowl games. We just never know.

 

 

the guys gave up against Wisconsin, they even admitted that, so if we get behind early, we may see a real ass whupin'....i hope not.

[ladyhawke]

Here is my take on this game-

 

Spurrier is not known for winning bowls - I personally think he's probably a bit lazy and doesn't work his teams very hard. Their practice schedule seems to have been lighter than ours both at home and in Orlando. Bo likes lay offs, seems to do pretty well with extra time to prepare. Seems like we're practicing, going in full pads, etc. Advantage NU

 

Plus, we have a new offensive scheme - I think NU gains more from the extra practice time than SC does. Advantage NU

 

 

Overall, I think NU is more on the upswing than SC and therefore momentum puts us even with a potentially more talented SC team.

 

Both teams have lost a Defensive Coordinator and promoted from within. I don't think there is any doubt the loser in that situation is SC. Spurrier isn't probably quite as involved in the defense as BO. Advantage NU.

 

Familiarity - NU has been preparing for a 'new' team all season with the switch to the big 10. Advantage NU.

 

Odd weaknesses - advantage to SC in having a scrambling quarterback. NU seems to struggle dispropotionately against teams with a scrambling QB.

 

Team speed - TV analysts would say advantage SC. I am not as certain.

 

Toughness - I think I go advantage NU on this. The SEC just doesn't seem to have the games of endless pain and wearing down the opponent.

 

I think it comes down to the type of game - if NU never trails by more than 7, I think we'll be able to wear down and out coach SC. If NU is slow to defend the speed or if the O-line is overwhelmed early and we have to abandon the running game, we'll lose and probably lose ugly. I think we'll out scheme them, but we can't let them use their speed to change our schemes.

 

Only one key to the game is probably required - NU rushing for 200 yards.

 

 

NU 27 SC 20

 

washington says hai

Hai back. We beat the crap outta that team. The only reason we didn't beat them a second time is because we didn't want to play them in that bowl. What an insult to us to have to play them again. I'm so glad that Baylor beat them last night.

No. The reason we got beat in the Holiday Bowl is because we were outcoached, outplayed, our offensive line played like garbage, Taylor played treacherous and we couldn't stop Polk. I find it extremely annoying when people say that they lost a bowl game "because they didn't want to be there". You mean that a bunch of youngsters that live in Nebraska didn't want to be in sunny San Diego in late December?

Sorry, I respectfully disagree with you. When a person doesn't want to be somewhere it is reflected in their attitude. The attitude of the entire team from the coaches down to the players was one of 'WE DON'T WANT TO BE HERE!' You can claim it was because of the things you listed but those things were a reflection of the whole attitude of the team-coaches included. Sorry to annoy you but I'm not the only one that thought that at the time. It was so obvious. Hopefully, the attitude of the team/coaches is one of 'WE WANT TO BE HERE!' and it will be reflected in the way they play-lights out football. GBR!

[True2tRA]

My take on the game.........I have no take. I have no expectations for this years football team. Until we find some consistency at every position I refuse to buy into this team. I've had my hopes up pretty high this year due to all the off season hype the world put out there. It was all crap. Burkhead, David, and Dennard are the only consistent players on this team. Everyone else has a long ways to go. I expect us to play. I don't expect us to play hard. If we do I'll be happy. Washington showed us last year though, that we cannot expect our team to be pumped up for bowl games. We just never know.

 

 

the guys gave up against Wisconsin, they even admitted that, so if we get behind early, we may see a real ass whupin'....i hope not.

Getting down early seems to change the mentality of this team and the coaching staff. We end up changing our gameplan far too soon. Adversity has seemed to always be a problem for this team. I wonder where they get that from? I mean, it's not like their head coach freaks out when things don't go his way.

[True2tRA]

I know one thing. If we lose this game. There will be nothing but negativity and question marks headed into next season.

[Redtillimdead]

9-6 NU... God bless the walk on kicker!

[Redtillimdead]

Tim tebow has a Brett maher tatoo!

[HUSKER 37]

How much for the Ocean front property outside of Omaha?

[Hunter94]

I know one thing. If we lose this game. There will be nothing but negativity and question marks headed into next season.

 

 

not necessarily, expectations are low, if we lose by 10 or less, that would not be so terrible......if we lose by 20 or more, then yes, the hangover will extend into next season.

[Redtillimdead]

Wait what??? Lose!!! Get the fudge outta here... Now some are ok with the result so long as we don't get blown out!! Win or else... Pull everyones schollies and start over.

[Excel]

Toughness - I think I go advantage NU on this. The SEC just doesn't seem to have the games of endless pain and wearing down the opponent.

 

I disagree with this one. USC has been in 5 tough close games that were down to the wire and that they had to fight in the whole time compared to NU's 3. Many of their games have been long slugfests testing the commitment, depth and conditioning of their players....

[The Dude]

I know one thing. If we lose this game. There will be nothing but negativity and question marks headed into next season.

 

 

not necessarily, expectations are low, if we lose by 10 or less, that would not be so terrible......if we lose by 20 or more, then yes, the hangover will extend into next season.

I have a hard time believing you and your clones will find any positives even if we kick the living sh#t out of South Carolina.

[PaulCrewe]

Toughness - I think I go advantage NU on this. The SEC just doesn't seem to have the games of endless pain and wearing down the opponent.

 

Have you watched an SEC game in the last ten years??? There is a reason that it is te best conference in the land. Those defenses you see week in and out more or less make Taylor crap his pants at night, and he doesn't have to face them.