EZ-E Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/50442/100-days-countdown-big-ten Quote Link to comment
EZ-E Posted May 22, 2012 Author Share Posted May 22, 2012 And boom goes the dynomite. Quote Link to comment
n.e.husker Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 6th. He has to become more efficient as a QB. He could have a scary good/bad year. Quote Link to comment
kchusker_chris Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 #6, that's about where i'd have em. As much as I think Rex is deserving of #2...I think i'd put Gholston there. That guy's a beast. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I saw this list. Hard to argue Ball ahead of Burkhead based on last year's stats. Wish we had a solidified offensive scheme for Rex to work with, not to mention those hosses Wiscy has up front. Quote Link to comment
RedRedJarvisRedwine Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Taylor makes this list post season.... Time to go TMagic... No more excuses! GBR! Quote Link to comment
tschu Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I'm confused about this thread's existence Quote Link to comment
rawhide Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 This thread started as a small cluster of amoeba which coalesced into consciousness after being irradiated by ...... sry j/k GBR Quote Link to comment
True2tRA Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I envy Wisconsin's offensive scheme. Stanford has a fantastic scheme too. Line it up, and hit em' in the mouth. When they beg for mercy, hit em' harder. Damn I miss the old days. edit: that was supposed to be a response to knapps post above....somehow that didn't work out. But yeah, them big boys up front for Wiscy are damn good ball players. Quote Link to comment
bshirt Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I envy Wisconsin's offensive scheme. Stanford has a fantastic scheme too. Line it up, and hit em' in the mouth. When they beg for mercy, hit em' harder. Damn I miss the old days. edit: that was supposed to be a response to knapps post above....somehow that didn't work out. But yeah, them big boys up front for Wiscy are damn good ball players. I miss those days too. Badly. But sadly, fans like us are grossly outnumbered as the vast majority pine for some kind of Clownahan fluffball. There's about 10,000 threads about our qb's throwing mechanics for every "one" about developing successful smashmouth. Oh well......we can still always hope! GBR!! Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I love Stanford's West Coast Offense. Quote Link to comment
tschu Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 I envy Wisconsin's offensive scheme. Stanford has a fantastic scheme too. Line it up, and hit em' in the mouth. When they beg for mercy, hit em' harder. Damn I miss the old days. edit: that was supposed to be a response to knapps post above....somehow that didn't work out. But yeah, them big boys up front for Wiscy are damn good ball players. I miss those days too. Badly. But sadly, fans like us are grossly outnumbered as the vast majority pine for some kind of Clownahan fluffball. There's about 10,000 threads about our qb's throwing mechanics for every "one" about developing successful smashmouth. Oh well......we can still always hope! GBR!! Its just a whole new day and age now. I don't think anyone is clamoring for a Mike Leach offense...we just realize that in order to attract better recruits and have success in a constantly evolving game, we can't line up in the I-formation 55 times a game anymore. Not a winning strategy these days. Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 I envy Wisconsin's offensive scheme. Stanford has a fantastic scheme too. Line it up, and hit em' in the mouth. When they beg for mercy, hit em' harder. Damn I miss the old days. edit: that was supposed to be a response to knapps post above....somehow that didn't work out. But yeah, them big boys up front for Wiscy are damn good ball players. I miss those days too. Badly. But sadly, fans like us are grossly outnumbered as the vast majority pine for some kind of Clownahan fluffball. There's about 10,000 threads about our qb's throwing mechanics for every "one" about developing successful smashmouth. Oh well......we can still always hope! GBR!! Its just a whole new day and age now. I don't think anyone is clamoring for a Mike Leach offense...we just realize that in order to attract better recruits and have success in a constantly evolving game, we can't line up in the I-formation 55 times a game anymore. Not a winning strategy these days. You sound like any random ESPN analyst circa 1992. 1 Quote Link to comment
bshirt Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 I envy Wisconsin's offensive scheme. Stanford has a fantastic scheme too. Line it up, and hit em' in the mouth. When they beg for mercy, hit em' harder. Damn I miss the old days. edit: that was supposed to be a response to knapps post above....somehow that didn't work out. But yeah, them big boys up front for Wiscy are damn good ball players. I miss those days too. Badly. But sadly, fans like us are grossly outnumbered as the vast majority pine for some kind of Clownahan fluffball. There's about 10,000 threads about our qb's throwing mechanics for every "one" about developing successful smashmouth. Oh well......we can still always hope! GBR!! Its just a whole new day and age now. I don't think anyone is clamoring for a Mike Leach offense...we just realize that in order to attract better recruits and have success in a constantly evolving game, we can't line up in the I-formation 55 times a game anymore. Not a winning strategy these days. You sound like any random ESPN analyst circa 1992. Or Bob Griese & ABC crews yaking that "NU must modernize it's offense to take it to the next level". Three NCs in the next five years really shut those clowns up in a big way. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.