why not Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Does he play on defense? HIs measurables sound good for inside linbacker. Link to comment
Brouhaha Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 would never look at moving him away from offense. Link to comment
jmfb Posted January 31, 2013 Author Share Posted January 31, 2013 He played some D for Northstar last year- very little at LB I doubt he plays much on D this year- I think they are expecting him to carry even more of the load than last year Link to comment
blessed2bahusker Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 His 4.1 agility is very good as well. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe 3.9 is like the best of the best when talking about lateral movement. Link to comment
Atbone95 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 His 4.1 agility is very good as well. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe 3.9 is like the best of the best when talking about lateral movement. I know two kids at my school who can get under 4... Granted, they're extremely fast, but I would assume college athletes could do better. Not sure on the 3.9 mark. 1 Link to comment
jmfb Posted February 1, 2013 Author Share Posted February 1, 2013 His 4.1 agility is very good as well. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe 3.9 is like the best of the best when talking about lateral movement. I know two kids at my school who can get under 4... Granted, they're extremely fast, but I would assume college athletes could do better. Not sure on the 3.9 mark. Not sure your times are accurrate MOST DI top kids are in the 4.4- 4.6 area: http://247sports.com/Article/Under-Armour-Combine-Top-20--10074 Link to comment
Atbone95 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 We're talking a pro agility drill? Edit: Realized my mistake. I saw agility and just instantly assumed it was a pro-agility drill. That is what we're talking about, right.. Link to comment
jmfb Posted February 1, 2013 Author Share Posted February 1, 2013 yes The standard test most HS players are measured on Link to comment
Blackshirts007 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Someone help me out with this please. So it shows he doesn't have any offers yet on rivals but shows a lengthy list of school with interest level. Are those schools that he had mentioned he's interested in, during an interview or something? or does rivals just put a list of schools until he starts getting offers and different interest levels? Link to comment
blessed2bahusker Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 I have wondered the same thing for a long time. Someone posted at one time that the schools listed without offers are directly from the kid or his family. Those schools are suppose to be the schools that have shown some sort of interest such as a letter or phone call. I imagine that the the site, like rivals for instance, has some form of feedback where the kid will update them on what schools are showing interest or offering, whether it be an interview or e-mail or even text message. The way it is all set up obviously lends itself to some misinformation being put out there. I can remember a handful of times where a kid has offers listed which turn out to be untrue. I imagine the schools listed as showing interest are untrue sometimes as well. Link to comment
chamrocck Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 This kid is in Lincoln. Here is our back-up to Cross. I don't see how this kid won't be ! Link to comment
RedRedJarvisRedwine Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 His 4.1 agility is very good as well. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe 3.9 is like the best of the best when talking about lateral movement. I know two kids at my school who can get under 4... Granted, they're extremely fast, but I would assume college athletes could do better. Not sure on the 3.9 mark. Not sure your times are accurrate MOST DI top kids are in the 4.4- 4.6 area: http://247sports.com/Article/Under-Armour-Combine-Top-20--10074 So what we can deduce is that Austin's 4.1 is special! Link to comment
jmfb Posted February 8, 2013 Author Share Posted February 8, 2013 His 4.1 agility is very good as well. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe 3.9 is like the best of the best when talking about lateral movement. I know two kids at my school who can get under 4... Granted, they're extremely fast, but I would assume college athletes could do better. Not sure on the 3.9 mark. Not sure your times are accurrate MOST DI top kids are in the 4.4- 4.6 area: http://247sports.com...e-Top-20--10074 So what we can deduce is that Austin's 4.1 is special! I guess- with the exception of atbone95 has a bunch of kids in his HS that run a 3.9 "pro agility" that somehow is different while being the same but uses the same exact term "pro agility" LOL Link to comment
Atbone95 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 His 4.1 agility is very good as well. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe 3.9 is like the best of the best when talking about lateral movement. I know two kids at my school who can get under 4... Granted, they're extremely fast, but I would assume college athletes could do better. Not sure on the 3.9 mark. Not sure your times are accurrate MOST DI top kids are in the 4.4- 4.6 area: http://247sports.com...e-Top-20--10074 So what we can deduce is that Austin's 4.1 is special! I guess- with the exception of atbone95 has a bunch of kids in his HS that run a 3.9 "pro agility" that somehow is different while being the same but uses the same exact term "pro agility" LOL I see the word pro-agility used twice in that article. One is for a DE who runs a 4.5. Great for a DL. One is for a RB who ran a 4.3 on a damp field that slowed him down. Already, we have someone who (in sloppy conditions) beats out your "most D1 top kids". Unless the drills I've seen set up are somehow shorter, 4.4-4.6 is not the best of the best. Pretty sure T-Mart runs right below a 3.9, which is the school record. I'm not inventing information here. Edit: On the topic of the recruit, yes, 4.1 is a great pro agility time. Not the best, but I'm sure it can be improved upon when coming into a college program. Link to comment
bisonwiches Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Is this kid from nebraska or is he a transplant like foster. Must get imho can't let local kids go out of state Link to comment
Recommended Posts