Jump to content


Bo Pelini Turnovers in Big Games


Nobody

Recommended Posts

2008

Virginia Tech - NU: 2, VAtech: 0................L

#4 Missouri - NU: 2, MU: 0.........................L

#7 Texas Tech - NU: 0, TT: 2......................L

#4 Oklahoma - NU: 4, OU: 1.......................L,

Clemson - NU: 3, Clemson: 2.....................W

 

2009

#13 Virginia Tech - NU: 2, VAtech: 0........L

#24 Missouri - NU: 2, MU: 3.......................W

Texas Tech - NU: 2, TT: 0...........................L

Iowa State - NU: 8, IS: 0..............................L

#20 Oklahoma - NU: 1, OU: 5....................W

#3 Texas - NU: 3, TX: 3...............................L

#22 Arizona - NU: 0, AZ: 1.........................W

 

2010

Texas - NU: 1, TX: 0...................................L

# 17 OK State - NU: 1, OKS: 1...................W

#7 Missouri - NU: 0, MU: 1.........................W

#18 Texas A&M - NU: 2, A&M: 0...............L

#10 Oklahoma - NU: 4, OU: 1.....................L

Washington - NU: 2, WU: 0.........................L

 

2011

#7 Wisconsin - NU: 3, WI: 1........................L

#9 Michigan State - NU: 1, MSU: 1...........W

Northwestern - NU: 1, NW: 1.......................L

#12 Penn State - NU: 1, PS: 1...................W

#20 Michigan - NU: 3, MU: 1.......................L

#10 South Carolina - NU: 2, SC: 0.............L

 

2012

#16 UCLA - NU: 2, UCLA: 1.......................L

#22 Wisconsin - NU: 2, WI: 1.....................W

#12 Ohio State - NU: 4, OSU: 1.................L

#20 Michigan - NU: 2, MI: 3........................W

Wisconsin - NU: 3, WI: 0..............................L

#6 Georgia - NU: 3, UG: 2...........................L

 

2013

#16 UCLA - NU: 1, UCLA: 1.........................L

Minnesota - NU:2, Minn: 0...........................L

#16 Michigan State - NU: 5, MS:0................L

Iowa - NU:3, Iowa: 0.....................................L

Link to comment

2008

Virginia Tech - NU: 2, VAtech: 0................L

#4 Missouri - NU: 2, MU: 0.........................L

#7 Texas Tech - NU: 0, TT: 2......................L

#4 Oklahoma - NU: 4, OU: 1.......................L

 

2009

#13 Virginia Tech - NU: 2, VAtech: 0........L

#24 Missouri - NU: 2, MU: 3.......................W

Texas Tech - NU: 2, TT: 0...........................L

Iowa State - NU: 8, IS: 0..............................L

#20 Oklahoma - NU: 1, OU: 5....................LTHIS WAS A WIN

#3 Texas - NU: 3, TX: 3...............................L

#22 Arizona - NU: 0, AZ: 1.........................W

 

2010

Texas - NU: 1, TX: 0...................................L

# 17 OK State - NU: 1, OKS: 1...................L THIS WAS A WIN

#7 Missouri - NU: 0, MU: 1.........................W

#18 Texas A&M - NU: 2, A&M: 0...............L

#10 Oklahoma - NU: 4, OU: 1.....................L

Washington - NU: 2, WU: 0.........................L

 

2011

#7 Wisconsin - NU: 3, WI: 1........................L

#9 Michigan State - NU: 1, MSU: 1...........W

Northwestern - NU: 1, NW: 1.......................L

#12 Penn State - NU: 1, PS: 1...................W

#20 Michigan - NU: 3, MU: 1.......................L

#10 South Carolina - NU: 2, SC: 0.............L

 

2012

#16 UCLA - NU: 2, UCLA: 1.......................L

#22 Wisconsin - NU: 2, WI: 1.....................W

#12 Ohio State - NU: 4, OSU: 1.................L

#20 Michigan - NU: 2, MI: 3........................W

Wisconsin - NU: 3, WI: 0..............................L

#6 Georgia - NU: 3, UG: 2...........................L

 

2013

#16 UCLA - ???

Just pointing out a couple errors. In our favor of course. :)

  • Fire 3
Link to comment

I guess it's another data point about Bo's tenure. I continue to be on the fence about him.

 

I think he will always deliver 9+ wins

I don't think he will ever deliver a championship

 

So, is 9 wins and competing but not winning a championship enough to tip the scales one way or another?

 

 

If this were true, and he was incapable of winning even conference championships, he would eventually be gone.

 

But I don't think that's the reality of the situation. There have been a lot of extenuating circumstances surrounding this program over the last half decade, more than (possibly) any other team in America. He's getting better talent, and we saw him come within :01 of a conference championship when he had the talent, and within one healthy quarterback of a second conference championship as well.

Link to comment

So, is 9 wins and competing but not winning a championship enough to tip the scales one way or another?

At most schools winning 9 games every year and being competitive would be good enough. Problem is I don't think that will keep people happy here. Not saying this is right or wrong but Nebraska fans always expect to be one of the best teams in the country and 9 wins doesn't accomplish that.

Link to comment
Just pointing out a couple errors. In our favor of course. :)

 

+1. edited.

 

One thing stands out to me....I watched all of those games, but I never once saw Bo Pelini turn the ball over.

One thing stands out to me....I watched all of those games, but I never once saw Bo Pelini turn the ball over.

 

/thread

 

Can you really blame these on Bo?

 

Yep. Fully expected this is as the first post... surprised it was the 2nd post.

As far as i'm concerned... Bo was in the game carrying the ball on each of those turnovers.

Link to comment

Just pointing out a couple errors. In our favor of course. :)

 

+1. edited.

 

One thing stands out to me....I watched all of those games, but I never once saw Bo Pelini turn the ball over.

One thing stands out to me....I watched all of those games, but I never once saw Bo Pelini turn the ball over.

 

/thread

 

Can you really blame these on Bo?

 

Yep. Fully expected this is as the first post... surprised it was the 2nd post.

As far as i'm concerned... Bo was in the game carrying the ball on each of those turnovers.

 

What do you expect when you put Bo Pelini turnovers in big games. Bo didn't turn the ball over, the team did. Obvious agenda is obvious.

  • Fire 2
Link to comment

Eventually, I don't think 9 wins will be enough for the fan base. The turnovers are one of a couple major issues that have been prevalent in recent years, and as the data shows, NU loses the turnover battle significantly more times than win it in big games. Now, some of those games were certainly against better teams, but there are several games against teams of equal or lesser value where NU still loses the battle.

 

I think Nebraska has a standard of at least winning conference titles. If that doesn't change for Pelini soon, we could see the program go in a different direction.

 

Not to derail the thread too much, of course.

Link to comment

What do expect when you put Bo Pelini turnovers in big games. Bo didn't turn the ball over, the team did. Obvious agenda is obvious.

I'm not sure if you noticed, but the players change every year. It doesn't make sense to list the players' names. Since this is a consistent problem regardless of who's playing, coaching is obviously an important factor.

  • Fire 3
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...