University of Misery

[knapplc]

You have polls, not data. Those are opinions. People think race relations are worse because we have video of cops shooting unarmed black men. That doesn't mean it's demonstrably worse, it means we have evidence.

[NUance]

Where is the source that says "racial issues in this country have gotten worse under Obama?" Not opinions, facts.

 

A poll doesn't mean that "racial issues in this country have gotten worse under Obama." A poll is an opinion. Facts would be data that shows it's gotten worse.

 

But aren't racial issues themselves opinions? Opinions that one group believes itself to be superior to another group?

[HuskerNation1]

You have polls, not data. Those are opinions. People think race relations are worse because we have video of cops shooting unarmed black men. That doesn't mean it's demonstrably worse, it means we have evidence.

 

A poll, or series of polls, are the best data points to show a country's views on a topic. So in the USA Today article you just cited, please explain your facts, and how they speak to the definition of racism?

[knapplc]

 

Where is the source that says "racial issues in this country have gotten worse under Obama?" Not opinions, facts.

 

A poll doesn't mean that "racial issues in this country have gotten worse under Obama." A poll is an opinion. Facts would be data that shows it's gotten worse.

But aren't racial issues themselves opinions? Opinions that one group believes itself to be superior to another group?

 

No, any more than it's an opinion that the money in the bank vault should be mine, so if I take it, it's not a crime.

[knapplc]

 

You have polls, not data. Those are opinions. People think race relations are worse because we have video of cops shooting unarmed black men. That doesn't mean it's demonstrably worse, it means we have evidence.

A poll, or series of polls, are the best data points to show a country's views on a topic. So in the USA Today article you just cited, please explain your facts, and how they speak to the definition of racism?

 

Did you read the article? Here's the direct quote, citing a racist act: "The most recent racist incident came Oct. 24 when a swastika was drawn with human feces on a college dorm's white wall."

[HuskerNation1]

 

 

You have polls, not data. Those are opinions. People think race relations are worse because we have video of cops shooting unarmed black men. That doesn't mean it's demonstrably worse, it means we have evidence.

A poll, or series of polls, are the best data points to show a country's views on a topic. So in the USA Today article you just cited, please explain your facts, and how they speak to the definition of racism?

 

Did you read the article? Here's the direct quote, citing a racist act: "The most recent racist incident came Oct. 24 when a swastika was drawn with human feces on a college dorm's white wall."

 

 

Art can be interpretive...how does that prove that there is more racism and use of racial slurs at Mizzou than any other campus. I have read a lot of crap on doors in bathrooms, including hateful language against white, Christians, blacks, and gays. If that is what you are basing your "facts" on as real data points, then you need to go to stats 101.

[knapplc]

 

 

 

You have polls, not data. Those are opinions. People think race relations are worse because we have video of cops shooting unarmed black men. That doesn't mean it's demonstrably worse, it means we have evidence.

A poll, or series of polls, are the best data points to show a country's views on a topic. So in the USA Today article you just cited, please explain your facts, and how they speak to the definition of racism?

 

Did you read the article? Here's the direct quote, citing a racist act: "The most recent racist incident came Oct. 24 when a swastika was drawn with human feces on a college dorm's white wall."

 

Art can be interpretive...how does that prove that there is more racism and use of racial slurs at Mizzou than any other campus. I have read a lot of crap on doors in bathrooms, including hateful language against white, Christians, blacks, and gays. If that is what you are basing your "facts" on as real data points, then you need to go to stats 101.

 

So now swastikas are "art?"

[HuskerNation1]

 

 

 

 

You have polls, not data. Those are opinions. People think race relations are worse because we have video of cops shooting unarmed black men. That doesn't mean it's demonstrably worse, it means we have evidence.

A poll, or series of polls, are the best data points to show a country's views on a topic. So in the USA Today article you just cited, please explain your facts, and how they speak to the definition of racism?

 

Did you read the article? Here's the direct quote, citing a racist act: "The most recent racist incident came Oct. 24 when a swastika was drawn with human feces on a college dorm's white wall."

 

Art can be interpretive...how does that prove that there is more racism and use of racial slurs at Mizzou than any other campus. I have read a lot of crap on doors in bathrooms, including hateful language against white, Christians, blacks, and gays. If that is what you are basing your "facts" on as real data points, then you need to go to stats 101.

 

So now swastikas are "art?"

 

 

That's what the Progressive have claimed in the past about much of their anti-religious "art" including the time the taxpayer-subsidized Brooklyn Museum of Art ran an exhibit in which a portrait of the Virgin Mary was partly made of pornographic pictures and elephant dung

 

[HuskerNation1]

 

 

 

 

 

You have polls, not data. Those are opinions. People think race relations are worse because we have video of cops shooting unarmed black men. That doesn't mean it's demonstrably worse, it means we have evidence.

A poll, or series of polls, are the best data points to show a country's views on a topic. So in the USA Today article you just cited, please explain your facts, and how they speak to the definition of racism?

 

Did you read the article? Here's the direct quote, citing a racist act: "The most recent racist incident came Oct. 24 when a swastika was drawn with human feces on a college dorm's white wall."

 

Art can be interpretive...how does that prove that there is more racism and use of racial slurs at Mizzou than any other campus. I have read a lot of crap on doors in bathrooms, including hateful language against white, Christians, blacks, and gays. If that is what you are basing your "facts" on as real data points, then you need to go to stats 101.

 

So now swastikas are "art?"

 

 

That's what the Progressive have claimed in the past about much of their anti-religious "art" including the time the taxpayer-subsidized Brooklyn Museum of Art ran an exhibit in which a portrait of the Virgin Mary was partly made of pornographic pictures and elephant dung

 

 

 

But again, you are totally off point here. You are claiming that there are hard data points that the campus of Mizzou is uniquely racist because of something put on a wall in a bathroom. Is that your true data point?

 

Yet when others have stated that race relations in the US have gotten worse under Obama, and have shown multiple polls all showing the same trend lines, and that involved large samplings of the population, you claim its just an opinion, but a drawing on the walls of a campus room is a substantial fact to prove your point. LOL

[knapplc]

I explained how opinions are not facts, and why people may have the opinion that "race relations are worse under Obama."

 

I did not ever claim "the campus of Mizzou is uniquely racist."

[HuskerNation1]

I explained how opinions are not facts, and why people may have the opinion that "race relations are worse under Obama."

 

I did not ever claim "the campus of Mizzou is uniquely racist."

 

Well your whole point here is how bad racism is at Mizzou, and you said earlier "There is demonstrably racism at Missouri" but now you are admitting it's nothing unique to what may exist on every college campus. Thus, that begs the question why should the President have caved to the demands of this small niche group because he didn't agree to their demands which included admitting white privilege, and what precedent does this set moving forward when a college president caves to any demands that come from a group that has the support of the college football team?

[knapplc]

 

I explained how opinions are not facts, and why people may have the opinion that "race relations are worse under Obama."

 

I did not ever claim "the campus of Mizzou is uniquely racist."

 

Well your whole point here is how bad racism is at Mizzou, and you said earlier "There is demonstrably racism at Missouri" but now you are admitting it's nothing unique to what may exist on every college campus. Thus, that begs the question why should the President have caved to the demands of this small niche group because he didn't agree to their demands which included admitting white privilege, and what precedent does this set moving forward when a college president caves to any demands that come from a group that has the support of the college football team?

 

 

Try again. That's not my point, has never been my point, and it's laughable that you're trying to manipulate this into something it isn't.

 

Seriously. Try reiterating the point I've been making without exaggeration, without misrepresenting it, without artifice. This should be entertaining.

[HuskerNation1]

 

 

I explained how opinions are not facts, and why people may have the opinion that "race relations are worse under Obama."

 

I did not ever claim "the campus of Mizzou is uniquely racist."

 

Well your whole point here is how bad racism is at Mizzou, and you said earlier "There is demonstrably racism at Missouri" but now you are admitting it's nothing unique to what may exist on every college campus. Thus, that begs the question why should the President have caved to the demands of this small niche group because he didn't agree to their demands which included admitting white privilege, and what precedent does this set moving forward when a college president caves to any demands that come from a group that has the support of the college football team?

 

 

Try again. That's not my point, has never been my point, and it's laughable that you're trying to manipulate this into something it isn't.

 

Seriously. Try reiterating the point I've been making without exaggeration, without misrepresenting it, without artifice. This should be entertaining.

 

 

Ok, well then please state your point on what has transpired at Mizzou.

[knapplc]

 

Ok, well then please state your point on what has transpired at Mizzou.

 

Racist acts have occurred at Missouri. It is the legal responsibility of the Missouri administration to prevent such things.

[HuskerNation1]

 

 

Ok, well then please state your point on what has transpired at Mizzou.

 

Racist acts have occurred at Missouri. It is the legal responsibility of the Missouri administration to prevent such things.

 

 

And how would the Mizzou President or any other President prevent racist acts. We have had racist acts all over this country, moreso in recent years, so is the POTUS legally responsible to prevent those things? And since they have continued, do you feel he should step down?