Mavric Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 “You’ve got to be in the top five and preferably the top three to win a championship,” Riley told The World-Herald in late April. “Historically, that’s probably true. You have to be up there in the turnover margin, you have to be better running the ball and you have to be better in total defense. You can’t hide from history.” In March, Banker echoed Riley’s goal. “What we’ll probably do is take the average of the top three defenses,” Banker said. Defense is measured over many categories, making it possible for a unit to be top three in some categories and not in others but still have an overall profile that lends itself to conference championship-caliber football. Nebraska’s defense played this brand of ball in 2006, 2009 and 2010. All three years, NU advanced to the Big 12 title game. The Huskers lost all three games, in part because the offenses produced seven, 12 and 20 points in those games. OWH Quote Link to comment
lo country Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 Read the article. NU has been pretty dismal on D. Bankers history the past five years, even worse. I'm hoping better talent will equate to better results. On another note, if our 2009 team had an offensive pulse............ 2 Quote Link to comment
JJkinz Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 As much flack as Banker gets (and probably deserves) for our defensive struggles his first year, you can definitely see the decline in performance that happened during Bo's tenure. We had some good starters, but Banker was left with pretty minimal depth at most positions. PPG 2009 - 1st 2010 - 2nd 2011 - 7th 2012 - 9th 2013 - 6th 2014 - 9th Quote Link to comment
dvdcrr Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 2009 team with even slightly above ave. offense would have been NC. If they could have produced an average of 21 pts. they would have been NC. Quote Link to comment
dvdcrr Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 As much flack as Banker gets (and probably deserves) for our defensive struggles his first year, you can definitely see the decline in performance that happened during Bo's tenure. We had some good starters, but Banker was left with pretty minimal depth at most positions. PPG 2009 - 1st 2010 - 2nd 2011 - 7th 2012 - 9th 2013 - 6th 2014 - 9th Respecfully, in those later years Pelini wasn't commanding the defense as he had been prior. (2003,2008,2009,) I could tell that elements of the 2014 defense were getting mixed messages from Pelini and Pap. I think Pelini was trying to put more on Paps so that he could ascend to more of a HC role and be involved with both O and D. If Pelini had just been fully committed to the D I think the numbers would have been better. One wierd thing: while Pelini came from the Big 10 as a player, he was much more adept at shutting down Big 12 style offenses. We were really built for that. Quote Link to comment
lo country Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 2009 team with even slightly above ave. offense would have been NC. If they could have produced an average of 21 pts. they would have been NC. So much this. So, so much this. Talk about the one that got away. Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Top 3??? Whatever happened to #1?! We can't be okay with second. How fare have we fallen? 1 Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 (edited) When Nebraska football coach Mike Riley talks about how his 2016 team will improve on its 6-7 record from 2015, he consistently indicates a desire for the offense to run the ball better and throw fewer interceptions. Riley also wants more from the defense, coordinated by close friend and longtime confidant Mark Banker. In fact, Riley wants the Huskers to be a top-three defense in the Big Ten. http://www.omaha.com/huskers/numbers-don-t-lie-huskers-have-struggled-to-stop-foes/article_1ffca455-c6bf-55b3-9925-15e7fc4f8e1e.html Edited May 9, 2016 by Mavric Merged 1 Quote Link to comment
Red Dead Redemption Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 he consistently indicates a desire for the offense to run the ball better I think one of the first steps for the offense to run the ball better, would be to, um, actually run the ball. 4 Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 The 2nd is to convince Tommy not to throw YOLO bombs into triple coverage. 7 Quote Link to comment
Red Dead Redemption Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 The 2nd is to convince Tommy not to throw YOLO bombs into triple coverage. Exactly. Let him run the ball instead. Quote Link to comment
cm husker Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 What does "run the ball better" mean to Riley? Average 300 yards a game rushing? I'm guessing no. So what does he mean other than the normal platitude of "be more efficient." 2 Quote Link to comment
Red Five Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Focus, guys. This thread is about the defense. Take the "run the ball" crap to the countless other threads about it. 3 Quote Link to comment
Red Five Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 IMO, the biggest thing holding us back is the defense. Our offense was fine last year, we averaged 33 points/game (roughly the same as the last 5 or so years). Run the ball, pass the ball, whatever. But the defense needs to drastically improve before we can even start thinking about winning a B1G title. Against BYU, Illinois, and Wisconsin the D had chances to put the game away in the final minute, but couldn't get a stop. Against NW, we needed a stop in the final 4 minutes to get the ball back down 2, but couldn't get it. Looking at last year, we need to be much better against the pass, both in coverage and finding a pass rush. 2 Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Focus, guys. This thread is about the defense. Take the "run the ball" crap to the countless other threads about it. This. Any derailments will get nuked from orbit. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.