Jump to content


Impressed with the D Line


Recommended Posts

 

 

I saw Freedom inside on a few plays or I thought I did. Anyone else see this during the game too? It may have only been a play or two he was inside. The D-line is looking good and that makes me think Parrella is getting the most out of what he has.

 

Yeah, pretty sure he was inside at more of a DT position on at least a couple plays. But I don't really remember the situation now - I'm assuming pass rush package.

 

I think that's part of the 30 package that Banker likes to use in pass rush situations. They use 3 down linemen, 2 LB's, and 6 DB's. Freedom would slide inside if one of the LB's is being asked to rush.

 

Are you sure? I think they were playing a 3-3-5.

Link to comment

I felt the same way about the line's performance against Fresno St. that I did about it last year - looks fairly good against the run but not a lot of difference making pass rushers. We're probably going to have to rely on a lot of blitzes this year to get pressure.

 

However, we're not very deep along the lines yet so I kind of expected this. The other thing to keep in my mind is Parrella really hasn't had a lot of time to work with these guys - just the spring and fall camp. I imagine they could be one of the more improved units come season's end.

Link to comment

 

 

 

I saw Freedom inside on a few plays or I thought I did. Anyone else see this during the game too? It may have only been a play or two he was inside. The D-line is looking good and that makes me think Parrella is getting the most out of what he has.

 

Yeah, pretty sure he was inside at more of a DT position on at least a couple plays. But I don't really remember the situation now - I'm assuming pass rush package.

 

I think that's part of the 30 package that Banker likes to use in pass rush situations. They use 3 down linemen, 2 LB's, and 6 DB's. Freedom would slide inside if one of the LB's is being asked to rush.

 

Are you sure? I think they were playing a 3-3-5.

 

No, I'm not 100% sure. I thought Banker called his dime package the 30 package. That would be 3 DL, 2 LBs, and 6 DBs. I could be wrong on that though.

Link to comment

 

 

 

 

I saw Freedom inside on a few plays or I thought I did. Anyone else see this during the game too? It may have only been a play or two he was inside. The D-line is looking good and that makes me think Parrella is getting the most out of what he has.

 

Yeah, pretty sure he was inside at more of a DT position on at least a couple plays. But I don't really remember the situation now - I'm assuming pass rush package.

 

I think that's part of the 30 package that Banker likes to use in pass rush situations. They use 3 down linemen, 2 LB's, and 6 DB's. Freedom would slide inside if one of the LB's is being asked to rush.

 

Are you sure? I think they were playing a 3-3-5.

 

No, I'm not 100% sure. I thought Banker called his dime package the 30 package. That would be 3 DL, 2 LBs, and 6 DBs. I could be wrong on that though.

 

I think the 30 package is a 3-man front without specifying the back 8.

Link to comment

 

 

 

I saw Freedom inside on a few plays or I thought I did. Anyone else see this during the game too? It may have only been a play or two he was inside. The D-line is looking good and that makes me think Parrella is getting the most out of what he has.

 

Yeah, pretty sure he was inside at more of a DT position on at least a couple plays. But I don't really remember the situation now - I'm assuming pass rush package.

I think that's part of the 30 package that Banker likes to use in pass rush situations. They use 3 down linemen, 2 LB's, and 6 DB's. Freedom would slide inside if one of the LB's is being asked to rush.

Are you sure? I think they were playing a 3-3-5.
I think you're right, generally. But they may have switched it up a bit. Newby was usually the linebacker on the outside of Freedom in that package. The backers seemed to be moving around a bit, trying to create confusion. It seems to have worked, at least on us. :)
Link to comment

Also I noticed Maurice and Stoltenberg switch sides a few times in the middle, based on instruction from the sidelines. I can also say Dzuris was subbed out more frequently than Freedom. Natter seemed to be the primary backup for both ends. Alex Davis and Natter played a series together with the first team, with Davis on the left and Natter on the right. Natter is the only defensive end I saw play both sides.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment

I thought the D-Line looked pretty good. Great run defense as always, and they pressured the quarterback a lot too, forcing him to throw (thus the grounding penalty, too).

 

The grounding penalty was caused by a nice blitz by Lamar Jackson, but yes, I agree that the d-line did get some good pressure on the QB. The D didn't get any sacks without blitzing, but good pressure from the front 4 did force the QB to throw the ball early and inaccurate at times.

 

I will throw out this football saying again "Pressure on the QB forces interceptions, while good coverage by the secondary forces sacks."

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...