Cdog923 Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 The odds of Minnesota winning at Camp Randall to me seem incredibly small. So naturally it makes quite a bit of sense to give up on winning a conference title. But, the Gophers could possibly pull off the upset. But I wouldn't possibly consider giving up on Riley with Tanner Lee in waiting. And I'd wager that a big portion of Husker fans don't have that same optimism because they're perpetually stuck in "Run the Damn Ball" mode. The fact that some people are putting their faith in a washout from Tulane doesn't instill much confidence for next year.... +1 for Calvin, but the sentiment is misplaced. Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 The 3 horse race at QB next season is good for all of us, regardless who wins it. I'm not even a little worried about that position. Quote Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 The 3 horse race at QB next season is good for all of us, regardless who wins it. I'm not even a little worried about that position. I absolutely agree; I just disagree with the notion that Lee is going to be a savior at the position, let alone the starter. Quote Link to comment
hskrpwr13 Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 The 3 horse race at QB next season is good for all of us, regardless who wins it. I'm not even a little worried about that position. I absolutely agree; I just disagree with the notion that Lee is going to be a savior at the position, let alone the starter. I don't think anyone expects a 1-year starter to "save us" at QB. However, I can see him bringing stability/consistency to the position, if other QBs aren't ready, similar to how Zac Taylor was for Callahan's offense. Quote Link to comment
caveman99 Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 The 3 horse race at QB next season is good for all of us, regardless who wins it. I'm not even a little worried about that position. I absolutely agree; I just disagree with the notion that Lee is going to be a savior at the position, let alone the starter. I don't think anyone expects a 1-year starter to "save us" at QB. However, I can see him bringing stability/consistency to the position, if other QBs aren't ready, similar to how Zac Taylor was for Callahan's offense. I believe he got the waiver for another year approved so it possible he could be a 2 year starter at DONU if he beats out POB and Gebbia. Quote Link to comment
NoLongerN Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 Re-read this today. Got a chuckle out of the comment on my post. The realist always gets scorned. Quote Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 The odds of Minnesota winning at Camp Randall to me seem incredibly small. So naturally it makes quite a bit of sense to give up on winning a conference title. But, the Gophers could possibly pull off the upset. But I wouldn't possibly consider giving up on Riley with Tanner Lee in waiting. And I'd wager that a big portion of Husker fans don't have that same optimism because they're perpetually stuck in "Run the Damn Ball" mode. The fact that some people are putting their faith in a washout from Tulane doesn't instill much confidence for next year.... Tanner is far from a wash up qb. He's transferring because the knew coaching staff runs the option. He could've transferred anywhere and will be the one of the most effective qbs we've had in a long time His passing statistics were worse than Armstrong's were, in a weaker conference. Kid may start by default, but don't expect "effective" off the bat. Keep in mind who he was throwing to and why he had to throw that much. He's getting a major upgrade for receivers he is throwing to and that should bump his completion % pretty far up. Compare Tulane's Individual Receiving % of 2015 with Nebraska's for reference: Tulane: http://www.footballstudyhall.com/pages/2015-tulane-advanced-statistical-profile Nebraska: http://www.footballstudyhall.com/pages/2015-nebraska-advanced-statistical-profile He won't be behind by 3 TD's trying to come and win by passing all the time (2014 Rutgers beat them by double digits) He won't be getting sacked 25 times each year like he did at Tulane because he'll have an upgraded OL. Nebraska won't allow 70-80 tackles for loss like Tulane did. He also won't be a redshirt freshman/sphomore starting here like he was at Tulane and he'll have an entire year of playbook study and practices here at Nebraska He won't be injured for most of second season here at Nebraska like he was at Tulane...he played 4 games with fractured fingers on his throwing hand during which he completed 39% of his passes...which definitely lowers the overal %. He was also considered a Top QB in the Nation by the Manning Passing Academy...Tommy wasn't invited until his senior year: http://247sports.com/Bolt/Top-college-QBs-working-at-Manning-Passing-Academy-38153689 If you can look at all those things above and just ignore them and think that he won't make a major improvement/jump...then you may want to call a doctor and get things checked out. Anyone can see that he's going to have a chance to be a lot better here than he was there. and by all accounts it seems like he has been fully committed to going the extra mile to be the best he can be here at NU. I like him and I think he could be good for us next year especially if we can land a difference maker in the pass game this recruiting cycle. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.