Archy1221 Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 2 minutes ago, Born N Bled Red said: Haha. Why, all you would do is try to discredit them anyway. Because inevitably anonymous sources can say whatever they want with zero accountability. Something this important should be sourced on record. 2 minutes ago, ZRod said: Didn't you just submit and article from an anonymous author? No 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 Just now, Archy1221 said: Because inevitably anonymous sources can say whatever they want with zero accountability. Something this important should be sourced on record. No You didn't? 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 1 minute ago, ZRod said: You didn't? No, that was the name the person's parents gave him/her. They hated their children. 1 2 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 2 minutes ago, ZRod said: Didn't you just submit and article from an anonymous author? You can find out who he is, and the info he wrote about is on record.he talks about what is in government and court records. It literally happened. He isn’t using off the record sources to make a point. 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 1 minute ago, Archy1221 said: You can find out who he is, and the info he wrote about is on record.he talks about what is in government and court records. It literally happened. He isn’t using off the record sources to make a point. What's his name and why isn't it easily found on redstate or his Twitter? Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 4 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: Because inevitably anonymous sources can say whatever they want with zero accountability LOL...I love this mantra. It became famous by a President that constantly used anonymous sources himself....at least that's what many people say. Link to comment
Born N Bled Red Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 Just now, Archy1221 said: Because inevitably anonymous sources can say whatever they want with zero accountability. Something this important should be sourced on record. No An example of Trump supporter thought process: Something bad about Trump said anonymously: It's not true, person won't stand by their statement Something bad about Trump said on the record: It's not true, said person has an axe to grind Something bad about Trump said by someone formerly loyal to Trump: It's not true, that person is a traitor Something bad about Trump said by Trump recorded and verified: It's not true, that's not what he meant, it's being taken out of context, oh he also said the opposite once. Something bad about Trump seen with their own eyes: It's not true, even if it was the ends justify the means. 5 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 2 minutes ago, ZRod said: You didn't? Also, writing under a pseudo name while using public record and named sources is literally nothing like using anonymous sources with zero on record verification. 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 2 minutes ago, ZRod said: What's his name and why isn't it easily found on redstate or his Twitter? Seek and ye shall find the answers you are looking for. Follow him on twitter. He’s a good follow. 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 3 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: LOL...I love this mantra. It became famous by a President that constantly used anonymous sources himself....at least that's what many people say. Didn’t like that either. I say. 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 3 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: Also, writing under a pseudo name while using public record and named sources is literally nothing like using anonymous sources with zero on record verification. Really? How do I know any comparison or reference he makes to his time in government is accurate or even true? You do realize that journalists cross check info even from anonymous sources, right? They even talk to other journalists and verify that they received similar info from the primary or even secondary sources. 2 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: Seek and ye shall find the answers you are looking for. Follow him on twitter. He’s a good follow. This shouldn't be a difficult answer. What's the name. You said he wasn't anonymous. 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 13 minutes ago, ZRod said: Really? How do I know any comparison or reference he makes to his time in government is accurate or even true? You do realize that journalists cross check info even from anonymous sources, right? They even talk to other journalists and verify that they received similar info from the primary or even secondary sources. This shouldn't be a difficult answer. What's the name. You said he wasn't anonymous. You do realize the majority of the anonymous sources Russia bombshells about Trump turned out to not be true. Of course you do 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 6 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: You do realize the majority of the anonymous sources Russia bombshells about Trump turned out to not be true. Of course you do Which ones? 1 Link to comment
Born N Bled Red Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 7 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: You do realize the majority of the anonymous sources Russia bombshells about Trump turned out to not be true. Of course you do Really, who said so? Barr? 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 7 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: You do realize the majority of the anonymous sources Russia bombshells about Trump turned out to not be true. Of course you do Most of us just paid attention to what our Intelligence Community said for that situation, so this is a moo point. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts