Danny Bateman Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 I'm wondering if these were deliberately done since they knew they'd be signing executive orders on the pipelines today. Would the EPA or USDA normally release any kind of information on the environmental impact of those moves? Link to comment
Fru Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 This is incredibly alarming. 2 Link to comment
zoogs Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 This is incredibly alarming. Yeah, my goodness. Those of you who support these happenings or don't consider them a big deal, what's the reasoning? I am quite curious. 1 Link to comment
Fru Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 This is incredibly alarming. Yeah, my goodness. Those of you who support these happenings or don't consider them a big deal, what's the reasoning? I am quite curious. I am wondering the same damn thing. 2 Link to comment
NM11046 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Call out to Dewiz, Bni and 84 Law specifically as I know theyve been advocating for this admin as recently as Sst. 3 Link to comment
Husker Red Til Dead Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 I support the pipelines if they are done with the best safety checks in place. Pipelines are the safest way of transport (https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/pipelines-are-safest-way-transport-oil-and-gas ) I also question why we need the pipeline at all. Is a refinery ,closer to where the oil is ,that big of a problem? The admin muzzling the epa and usda is very confusing. 1 Link to comment
teachercd Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 This is incredibly alarming. Yeah, my goodness. Those of you who support these happenings or don't consider them a big deal, what's the reasoning? I am quite curious. I am wondering the same damn thing. This is alarming for sure. Link to comment
NebraskaHarry Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 Yeah, lets put in a pipeline in the ground over a huge underground aquifer that extends from the Nebraska/South Dakota border all the way to Texas. An aquifer that literally flows from the surface of the ground in many areas and supplies the water to rivers such as the Niobrara. Plus it'll create a 50 permanent jobs. 50! Got to create them jobs. It's a stupid idea. Link to comment
teachercd Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 Yeah, lets put in a pipeline in the ground over a huge underground aquifer that extends from the Nebraska/South Dakota border all the way to Texas. An aquifer that literally flows from the surface of the ground in many areas and supplies the water to rivers such as the Niobrara. Plus it'll create a 50 permanent jobs. 50! Got to create them jobs. It's a stupid idea. But if it breaks...it will create even more jobs to clean it up! Link to comment
Husker Red Til Dead Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 Yeah, lets put in a pipeline in the ground over a huge underground aquifer that extends from the Nebraska/South Dakota border all the way to Texas. An aquifer that literally flows from the surface of the ground in many areas and supplies the water to rivers such as the Niobrara. Plus it'll create a 50 permanent jobs. 50! Got to create them jobs. It's a stupid idea. How many railroads and highways go over that same aquifer? The Ogallala is refilled by snow/rain runoff, so it is susceptible to surface contamination. So i refer to the fraser inst. study again, pipeline is safer then other methods of transport. Link to comment
VitMan Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 Yeah, lets put in a pipeline in the ground over a huge underground aquifer that extends from the Nebraska/South Dakota border all the way to Texas. An aquifer that literally flows from the surface of the ground in many areas and supplies the water to rivers such as the Niobrara. Plus it'll create a 50 permanent jobs. 50! Got to create them jobs. It's a stupid idea. How many railroads and highways go over that same aquifer? The Ogallala is refilled by snow/rain runoff, so it is susceptible to surface contamination. So i refer to the fraser inst. study again, pipeline is safer then other methods of transport. http://www.businessinsider.com/a-canadian-oil-pipeline-leaked-more-than-50000-gallons-of-oil-on-aboriginal-land-2017-1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 25, 2017 Author Share Posted January 25, 2017 Yeah, lets put in a pipeline in the ground over a huge underground aquifer that extends from the Nebraska/South Dakota border all the way to Texas. An aquifer that literally flows from the surface of the ground in many areas and supplies the water to rivers such as the Niobrara. Plus it'll create a 50 permanent jobs. 50! Got to create them jobs. It's a stupid idea. How many railroads and highways go over that same aquifer? The Ogallala is refilled by snow/rain runoff, so it is susceptible to surface contamination. So i refer to the fraser inst. study again, pipeline is safer then other methods of transport. http://www.businessinsider.com/a-canadian-oil-pipeline-leaked-more-than-50000-gallons-of-oil-on-aboriginal-land-2017-1 I'm pretty sure that's more than a truck holds. Link to comment
Husker Red Til Dead Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 Yeah, lets put in a pipeline in the ground over a huge underground aquifer that extends from the Nebraska/South Dakota border all the way to Texas. An aquifer that literally flows from the surface of the ground in many areas and supplies the water to rivers such as the Niobrara. Plus it'll create a 50 permanent jobs. 50! Got to create them jobs. It's a stupid idea. How many railroads and highways go over that same aquifer? The Ogallala is refilled by snow/rain runoff, so it is susceptible to surface contamination. So i refer to the fraser inst. study again, pipeline is safer then other methods of transport. http://www.businessinsider.com/a-canadian-oil-pipeline-leaked-more-than-50000-gallons-of-oil-on-aboriginal-land-2017-1 I'm pretty sure that's more than a truck holds. About 10 tanker trucks or 2 train tanker cars Link to comment
Recommended Posts