BigRedBuster Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 This is a question discussed on the radio this morning. I think they got these numbers because those were Thorson's numbers from last year and people think he's a good QB. But, the question is, would you be happy if those were Lee's numbers this season? 1 Quote Link to comment
teachercd Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 I think the 58% would be a little bit of an issue but I don't think the rest is all that bad. 1 Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 I don't think our offense would be that good if those are the numbers. TA as a Soph - 22 TDs, 12 INTs, 53.3%, 2695 yards 2016 Thorson - 22 TDs, 9 INTs, 58.6%, 3182 yards Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 I think Thorson's numbers are that "low" because of the style of offense that Fitzgerald prefers to play. You know NW is going to be more conservative and defense oriented than most teams. That said, I don't think Thorson is a great QB. He's only getting a lot of press because he's a returning QB for NW. If Diaco is able to improve the Blackshirts D significantly, the O-line improves (which improves the RB run game), and Langsdorf/Riley/Lee isn't forced to throw the ball 40-45 times a game, then those would be decent numbers for Lee. I don't think stats like this can be looked in a vacuum. Quote Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 This was on 1620 this morning. The completion % needs to be higher, but I would be alright with that TD to INT ratio, as long as we have at least 20 rushing TDs. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted August 24, 2017 Author Share Posted August 24, 2017 For me, these numbers are right on the border line. If you bump it to 22 9 and 60%, it looks much different even though that could be just one more completion per game. (depending on attempts). The thing that I keep in mind is, if we had these numbers, I think it opens up our running game more. Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 I think Yards Per Attempt and Yards Per Completion are more effective numbers to look at, along with completion %. Thorson's 2016 YPA and YPC were even worse than Armstrong's numbers were in 2016. To me, that's where NU should show improvement with Lee. 2 Quote Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 12 minutes ago, ColoradoHusk said: I think Yards Per Attempt and Yards Per Completion are more effective numbers to look at, along with completion %. Thorson's 2016 YPA and YPC were even worse than Armstrong's numbers were in 2016. To me, that's where NU should show improvement with Lee. The afternoon show put Lee's YPA at 7.7, if I remember right. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 Just FYI, this whole discussion started with Sam McKewon's article that he posted on Twitter and Benning replied asking why McKewon had Thorson as the top QB among the B1G West contenders. 1 Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted August 24, 2017 Author Share Posted August 24, 2017 1 minute ago, Mavric said: Just FYI, this whole discussion started with Sam McKewon's article that he posted on Twitter and Benning replied asking why McKewon had Thorson as the top QB among the B1G West contenders. Thanks.....I got in on the discussion towards the end so I didn't hear how it got started. Quote Link to comment
huskerfan92 Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 Don't get the hype with Thorson. He's an okay QB, but was aided a lot last year by Austin Carr. Northwestern offense is going to miss him this year. 1 Quote Link to comment
BIG ERN Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 Tommy Armstrong: *2016 Nebraska Big Ten SR QB 11 151 294 51.4 2180 7.4 7.1 14 8 123.9 Clayton Thorson: *2016 Northwestern Big Ten SO QB 13 280 478 58.6 3182 6.7 6.7 22 9 125.9 If Tanner Lee threw for 1,002 more yards, had 8 more TD's, 7% better completion percentage, and only one more INT than our numbers last year...I'd be okay with that. I think our run game will be much better this year to also help offset that. Just really hope that people aren't expecting him to come in and throw 65% 30 TD and 5 INT this season. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 If he threw for 1000 more yards in the same 11 games that TA played, that would be something. But Thorson's stats are over 13 games. Quote Link to comment
BIG ERN Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 9 minutes ago, Mavric said: If he threw for 1000 more yards in the same 11 games that TA played, that would be something. But Thorson's stats are over 13 games. Fair enough. So, 600 more yards if you go by averages. But IMO to look at stats in CFB is very hard to do. So many different things go into those numbers. Style of offense, tempo, how good your defense is, your strength of schedule. B10 games only Armstrong was 50.2% (lowest in the conference) 7 TD 7 INT Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 What is the running back stats during this time? Thorson had those numbers with arguably the best RB in the West playing on the same team. I'm not happy with Lee at those numbers if our RB's aren't getting the job done. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.