QMany Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 (edited) Unfortunate regression. 21/38 (55%) 225 Yards 2 TD 3 INT Edited November 4, 2017 by QMany 1 Quote Link to comment
redout22 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Just haaaad to jinx it. Quote Link to comment
huskerfan69 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 disappointing to see lee regress so much. it felt like he was turning a corner. i give him somewhat of a pass though because our o-line and running backs look bad. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Tanner Lee under Langs: 56.6%, 7.4 ypa, 1.5:1 TD:INT Ryker Fyfe under Langs: 53.2%, 6.5 ypa, 1.5:1 TD:INT So basically Lee is a half-step improvement from Fyfe. 1 Quote Link to comment
Hayseed Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 It's a combination of bad play calling, so-so blocking , and poor pass choices. A pocket passer should be better than a dual-threat guy like Tommy Armstrong. It's been hit-and-miss, like Jammal Lord used to say, but mostly miss with no run threat. We gave the game away with interceptions and poor choices in the red zone. Just hold the ball and kick the field goal and we most likely win by three before overtime. What's this thread about, stats or something? Quote Link to comment
Nebhawk Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Lee was progressing. He was also playing against teams that had sizable leads and didn't care if Lee completed a pass here and there. This whole season has been a mirage of crap. I games when we needed him and our offensive CO to step up and do better, we amazingly do worse. When we play the big boys, we can't compete. I don't put everything on Tanner however. This scheme is awful. Sure, our O-line can't really block that well, but in this game, he did have ample time to get rid of the ball. Running game is no better or no worse than its been all season long. Tanner makes bad decisions, but our scheme is mostly responsible for that. I say that Tanner should assume about 40% of the blame and Langs take the other 60%. If I were Tanner, I would go to NFL combine and see where I stack up. He can't be any worse than some NFL QB's that I have watched this season try to play the part. Quote Link to comment
4skers89 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 4 hours ago, QMany said: Unfortunate regression. 21/38 (55%) 225 Yards 2 TD 3 INT I think it's called regression to the mean, i.e. Lee's average/mean. 1 Quote Link to comment
gorp512 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 He runs like Ron Kellogg. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.