Ric Flair Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 This is really crazy stuff. https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/08/22/despite_comey_assurance_vast_bulk_of_weiner_laptop_emails_never_examined.html 1 Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 46 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: This is really crazy stuff. https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/08/22/despite_comey_assurance_vast_bulk_of_weiner_laptop_emails_never_examined.html Looks like a really legit site. Didn't your boy Donnie say if the article is quoting an anonymous source its made up? How can we trust this anonymous source?? Edit: just lost the spelling bee. Link to comment
Moiraine Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 1 minute ago, Nebfanatic said: Looks like a really legit site. Didn't your boy Donnie say if the article is quoting an anonomys source its made up? How can we trust this anonomys source?? Super legit site AND super legit date to post the article. 1 Link to comment
Ric Flair Posted August 25, 2018 Author Share Posted August 25, 2018 17 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said: Looks like a really legit site. Didn't your boy Donnie say if the article is quoting an anonymous source its made up? How can we trust this anonymous source?? Edit: just lost the spelling bee. Paul Sperry is a well known author and investigative journalist. This is a remarkably well-written and well-sourced piece. Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 6 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: Paul Sperry is a well known author and investigative journalist. This is a remarkably well-written and well-sourced piece. How do we know, the source is anonymous! That discredits the article according to our President. Don't know Sperry, but why the obsession with Hillary? She lost the election despite winning the popular vote so the grand conspiracy against Trump loses quite a bit of steam right there imo. Link to comment
Moiraine Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 7 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said: Don't know Sperry Some chapter titles from well known author and investigative journalist Paul Sperry, from his 2005 book titled "How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington" Here are some of his article titles for New York Post: Trump 'plans to scrap' Obama-era rule that turned schools into war zones Did Putin's pawns help assemble the Trump-smearing dossier? Meet the American women who are flocking to join ISIS 1 Link to comment
Ric Flair Posted August 25, 2018 Author Share Posted August 25, 2018 13 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said: How do we know, the source is anonymous! That discredits the article according to our President. Don't know Sperry, but why the obsession with Hillary? She lost the election despite winning the popular vote so the grand conspiracy against Trump loses quite a bit of steam right there imo. The conspiracy was for Hillary and against Trump. Thus the double standard in how the investigators have handled them. Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 3 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: The conspiracy was for Hillary and against Trump. Thus the double standard in how the investigators have handled them. And the notion a conspiracy even exists is nonsense for one reason. Trump is POTUS. If there was a governmental conspiracy to keep Trump out and get Hillary in they would have accomplished their goal quite easily. Just my opinion of course. 1 Link to comment
Moiraine Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 8 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: The conspiracy was for Hillary and against Trump. Thus the double standard in how the investigators have handled them. The investigation of Trump was hidden and the details of the investigation of Hillary revealed because they didn't want to be accused of playing favorites and trying to get Hillary elected. Funny how they're being accused of that anyway, including with this BS article. They should have just revealed both investigations. 3 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said: If there was a governmental conspiracy to keep Trump out and get Hillary in they would have accomplished their goal quite easily. Just my opinion of course. Yep. E.g. by revealing that the FBI was investigating him. They wanted Clinton's victory to be legitimate and not have it questioned. They thought if the Trump investigation was revealed before the election it would look like they were trying to manipulate things. If they actually were trying to manipulate things FOR Clinton, they would have either revealed the Trump investigation and the laptop, or only the Trump investigation. 1 Link to comment
Ric Flair Posted August 25, 2018 Author Share Posted August 25, 2018 28 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said: And the notion a conspiracy even exists is nonsense for one reason. Trump is POTUS. If there was a governmental conspiracy to keep Trump out and get Hillary in they would have accomplished their goal quite easily. Just my opinion of course. No one thought Trump would win. No one thought he had a chance. The conspiracy was to protect Hillary, who they assumed would be President. When Trumo was elected, the goal became to discredit him, interfere with his agenda, and try to remove him. Did you know that most of the charges against Manafort were examined by prosecutors years ago, who declined to prosecute. Then once Trump was elected, Mueller and Co. decided he needed to go to jail over them. I wonder why that was? Link to comment
commando Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 obama was a muslim born in kenya! Link to comment
mrandyk Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 You truly make a mockery of yourself with your sources. 5 Link to comment
Landlord Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 I think there's actually some legitimate threads of stinkiness being referenced in that article. Anyone who thinks that Clinton didn't have powerful influence over/with plenty of government officials all across D.C. is hopefully naive. This email thing is so dumb and such a non-story to me that I can't recall the details, but there does seem to be some incredibly dirty laundry surrounding her and Bill. That being said, Real Clear Investigations and Paul Sperry both very clearly have notable and strong conservative leanings and bias, as well as sensationalistic and emotionally loaded headlines/editorial decisions. Here's one thing he said that I agree with though: Link to comment
NM11046 Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 I think I may know Alex Jones' HB pen name ... 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts