cheekygeek Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 https://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissmith/2018/09/11/college-footballs-most-valuable-teams/ 1 Quote Link to comment
BoNeyard Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 Initial look at that list and I think Nebraska is too low, but then you realize the population of the state compared to the others on that list, and the lack of true success of the program over the last 18 years and that is pretty impressive to be 20th. Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 None of the years they used to calculate the average include the full Big Ten TV $, so I think we're doing pretty well. Quote Link to comment
VectorVictor Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 12 hours ago, Moiraine said: None of the years they used to calculate the average include the full Big Ten TV $, so I think we're doing pretty well. This. We'll be shooting up the list once we start getting the B1G money calculated in there. Also interesting to see Texass slipping. Having a fickle fanbase and a sub-mediocre product would do that, Bevo TV or not. Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 Does it really matter? Quote Link to comment
Guy Chamberlin Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 Gotta admit, Texas A&M at #1 came as a surprise. Apparently some large private donations came into play. Quote Link to comment
Guy Chamberlin Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 5 minutes ago, StPaulHusker said: Does it really matter? It depends. Does that list include the teams you will be competing against? Because money buys things. Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Guy Chamberlin said: It depends. Does that list include the teams you will be competing against? Because money buys things. I just mean, TAMU makes all that money and were no closer to winning anything of significance than Nebraska was. And what more can be bought to help the team that we don't already have? The facilities we have are as good or better than anyone on that list and it doesn't attract higher rated talent anymore than it did 10 years ago. Don't get me wrong. Having it is better than not. I just don't know how it's really made a difference overall. Other than not having to beg for buyout dollars from boosters to fire some coaches? Quote Link to comment
Huskers93-97 Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 22 minutes ago, StPaulHusker said: I just mean, TAMU makes all that money and were no closer to winning anything of significance than Nebraska was. And what more can be bought to help the team that we don't already have? The facilities we have are as good or better than anyone on that list and it doesn't attract higher rated talent anymore than it did 10 years ago. Don't get me wrong. Having it is better than not. I just don't know how it's really made a difference overall. Other than not having to beg for buyout dollars from boosters to fire some coaches? If they have that much money why not buy out Nick Saban and pay him another $100 million. Instead of settling for Jimbo.Go big or go home. Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Huskers93-97 said: If they have that much money why not buy out Nick Saban and pay him another $100 million. Instead of settling for Jimbo.Go big or go home. Who says they didn't try? Quote Link to comment
Huskers93-97 Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 Just now, StPaulHusker said: Who says they didn't try? Didnt try hard enough. $200 Million? Quote Link to comment
Guy Chamberlin Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 31 minutes ago, StPaulHusker said: I just mean, TAMU makes all that money and were no closer to winning anything of significance than Nebraska was. And what more can be bought to help the team that we don't already have? The facilities we have are as good or better than anyone on that list and it doesn't attract higher rated talent anymore than it did 10 years ago. Don't get me wrong. Having it is better than not. I just don't know how it's really made a difference overall. Other than not having to beg for buyout dollars from boosters to fire some coaches? You're right about the practical part. Money gets you into the big leagues, but more money hardly guarantees championships. It's not a big thing, but I do think some legitimate pride is involved. Nebraska Football has created a nationally entertaining product that is worth more than our modest population might suggest. Quote Link to comment
Crazyhole Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 All but 3 AP/coaches poll national champion teams since 1990 are included in this list. Miami, GaTech, and Colorado. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.