Jump to content


Cornhuskers make the Top 20! Forbes: College Football's Most Valuable Teams


cheekygeek

Recommended Posts


12 hours ago, Moiraine said:

None of the years they used to calculate the average include the full Big Ten TV $, so I think we're doing pretty well.

 

This. We'll be shooting up the list once we start getting the B1G money calculated in there. 

 

Also interesting to see Texass slipping. Having a fickle fanbase and a sub-mediocre product would do that, Bevo TV or not. 

Link to comment

1 minute ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

It depends. Does that list include the teams you will be competing against? Because money buys things.

 

I just mean, TAMU makes all that money and were no closer to winning anything of significance than Nebraska was.

 

And what more can be bought to help the team that we don't already have?  The facilities we have are as good or better than anyone on that list and it doesn't attract higher rated talent anymore than it did 10 years ago.

 

Don't get me wrong.  Having it is better than not.  I just don't know how it's really made a difference overall.  Other than not having to beg for buyout dollars from boosters to fire some coaches?

 

 

Link to comment
22 minutes ago, StPaulHusker said:

 

I just mean, TAMU makes all that money and were no closer to winning anything of significance than Nebraska was.

 

And what more can be bought to help the team that we don't already have?  The facilities we have are as good or better than anyone on that list and it doesn't attract higher rated talent anymore than it did 10 years ago.

 

Don't get me wrong.  Having it is better than not.  I just don't know how it's really made a difference overall.  Other than not having to beg for buyout dollars from boosters to fire some coaches?

 

 

If they have that much money why not buy out Nick Saban and pay him another $100 million. 

 

Instead of settling for Jimbo.Go big or go home.

Link to comment

31 minutes ago, StPaulHusker said:

 

I just mean, TAMU makes all that money and were no closer to winning anything of significance than Nebraska was.

 

And what more can be bought to help the team that we don't already have?  The facilities we have are as good or better than anyone on that list and it doesn't attract higher rated talent anymore than it did 10 years ago.

 

Don't get me wrong.  Having it is better than not.  I just don't know how it's really made a difference overall.  Other than not having to beg for buyout dollars from boosters to fire some coaches?

 

 

 

You're right about the practical part. Money gets you into the big leagues, but more money hardly guarantees championships.

 

It's not a big thing, but I do think some legitimate pride is involved. Nebraska Football has created a nationally entertaining product that is worth more than our modest population might suggest. 

 

 

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...