Jump to content


Throttling Down in the 3rd Quarter


knapplc

Recommended Posts

Two games, two weak performances by the offense in the third quarter. Matt Farniok talked about it at today's presser:

 

 

Frost talked about this in his presser today:

 

 

Yes, it's a small sample size, and yes, there were extenuating circumstances for the USA third quarter, but through two games, Nebraska has a developing trend of lack of production on offense in the third quarter.

 

Here are the stats by quarter through two games:

 

FIRST QUARTER

Offensive Points:  14

Yards:  249

Plays:  29

Yards Per Play:  8.6

Possessions:  6

Time of Possession:  12:04

 

 

SECOND QUARTER

Offensive Points:  17

Yards:  228

Plays:  47

Yards Per Play:  6.8

Possessions:  5

Time of Possession:  19:12

 

THIRD QUARTER

Offensive Points:  0

Yards:  76

Plays:  27

Yards Per Play:  2.1

Possessions:  6

Time of Possession:  11:15

 

FOURTH QUARTER

Offensive Points:  14

Yards:  183

Plays:  27

Yards Per Play:  6.8

Possessions:  8

Time of Possession:  11:57

 

 

To some, this will mean the opponents are making halftime adjustments and our staff isn't. This isn't true - we've come out with new packages, new blitzes, and new plays after halftime both games.

 

To me, it boils down to the players' mentality. They let up, as Farniok's quote admits, and start coasting.

 

We were up 17 points on Colorado at halftime. They had 74 total yards and 0 points. We were up 21-7 against S Alabama early in the third quarter.

 

Both times the team let off the throttle.

 

Edited by knapplc
Data error
  • Plus1 2
Link to comment

I kind of think that one has to back up the claim of "throttling down" by pointing out what specifically we did differently to actually throttle it down.

 

To me, "throttling down" usually entails just going with your most vanilla inside handoffs on 1st & 2nd down when you're up by 17 points. But that's not at all what we did. We actually didn't try to run and go with high percentage plays enough

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, knapplc said:

Two games, two weak performances by the offense in the third quarter. Matt Farniok talked about it at today's presser:

 

 

Frost talked about this in his presser today:

 

 

Yes, it's a small sample size, and yes, there were extenuating circumstances for the USA third quarter, but through two games, Nebraska has a developing trend of lack of production on offense in the third quarter.

 

Here are the stats by quarter through two games:

 

FIRST QUARTER

Offensive Points:  14

Yards:  249

Plays:  29

Yards Per Play:  11.8

Possessions:  6

Time of Possession:  12:04

 

 

SECOND QUARTER

Offensive Points:  17

Yards:  228

Plays:  47

Yards Per Play:  6.8

Possessions:  5

Time of Possession:  19:12

 

THIRD QUARTER

Offensive Points:  0

Yards:  76

Plays:  27

Yards Per Play:  2.1

Possessions:  6

Time of Possession:  11:15

 

FOURTH QUARTER

Offensive Points:  14

Yards:  183

Plays:  27

Yards Per Play:  6.8

Possessions:  8

Time of Possession:  11:57

 

 

To some, this will mean the opponents are making halftime adjustments and our staff isn't. This isn't true - we've come out with new packages, new blitzes, and new plays after halftime both games.

 

To me, it boils down to the players' mentality. They let up, as Farniok's quote admits, and start coasting.

 

We were up 17 points on Colorado at halftime. They had 74 total yards and 0 points. We were up 21-7 against S Alabama early in the third quarter.

 

Both times the team let off the throttle.

 

Amazing how this mentality is still an issue.

 

This team hasn't earned a f#&%ing thing. Colorado was never just going to roll over for them. Going 4-8 in back to back seasons and then taking your foot off the gas after a 17 point lead is how you go 4-8 again. 

  • Plus1 8
Link to comment
Just now, The Maudfather said:

Amazing how this mentality is still an issue.

 

This team hasn't earned a f#&%ing thing. Colorado was never just going to roll over for them. Going 4-8 in back to back seasons and then taking your foot off the gas after a 17 point lead is how you go 4-8 again. 

 

I think the killer instinct is one of the hardest things to develop in a team, and we definitely don't have it yet. Even when we were winning last year we didn't, we let teams like Illinois and Minnesota have a little life before finally slamming the door.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, The Maudfather said:

Amazing how this mentality is still an issue.

 

This team hasn't earned a f#&%ing thing. Colorado was never just going to roll over for them. Going 4-8 in back to back seasons and then taking your foot off the gas after a 17 point lead is how you go 4-8 again. 

 

They are drunk on thinking "We are Nebraska," and the Nebraska they think they are, that they are told they are, that all the wall art in all the athletic facilities tells them they are, is the 1980s & 1990s teams that won conference & national championships.

 

They have GOT to stop thinking that way. None of this will get better until they do.

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Undone said:

I kind of think that one has to back up the claim of "throttling down" by pointing out what specifically we did differently to actually throttle it down.

 

To me, "throttling down" usually entails just going with your most vanilla inside handoffs on 1st & 2nd down when you're up by 17 points. But that's not at all what we did. We actually didn't try to run and go with high percentage plays enough

 

This is to imply that it's a play-calling issue, when clearly, to me, it's an effort issue. They're getting beat on routes, getting beat on the line, getting chased down while running the ball.

 

The team's mentality switches to "we've got this" instead of "we have to keep going 30 more minutes."

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

I can tell you that if Nebraska scored in the 3rd to make it 24-0. The rout is on. I was in the section near the students and they were all in agreement that if Nebraska scored they were heading out. Some did at half. What an absolute meltdown. I wasn't in love with the play calling in the 3rd. Our defense let up big plays. Such a failed game with Nebraska's fans taking over Boulder. 

  • Plus1 3
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, knapplc said:

This is to imply that it's a play-calling issue, when clearly, to me, it's an effort issue. They're getting beat on routes, getting beat on the line, getting chased down while running the ball.

 

I personally am in fact going with it being a play-calling issue because of the two specific series on two specific possessions in the 3rd quarter that I've pointed out in other threads where we've got 2nd & 5 and then we're asking Martinez to stand in the pocket in a five wide set instead of going high percentage with an inside run or a quick screen.

That to me is the coaches actually going too far in the direction of putting the petal to the floor instead of looking for high percentage plays to move the sticks and I was out-of-my-mind pissed about it on Saturday.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, knapplc said:

 

They are drunk on thinking "We are Nebraska," and the Nebraska they think they are, that they are told they are, that all the wall art in all the athletic facilities tells them they are, is the 1980s & 1990s teams that won conference & national championships.

 

They have GOT to stop thinking that way. None of this will get better until they do.

I agree with this comment and that makes me sick to my stomach. 

Link to comment

I noticed a couple concering lines postgame:

1. Frost thinking that going up 24-0 wouldve emptied the stands and started the blowout.

2. Barry thinking they had it in the bag at half. That they thought they were going to win.

I don't like that today Frost doubled down on the idea that they needed just one more score. It's like they are trying to pick the right time to be able to stop trying hard. Just keep playing. If the other team quits, go harder. That's the fun time. There should never be any 'oh we're up by enough we can screw around' fun time. That's not how you win.

  • Plus1 3
Link to comment

10 minutes ago, Undone said:

 

I personally am in fact going with it being a play-calling issue because of the two specific series on two specific possessions in the 3rd quarter that I've pointed out in other threads where we've got 2nd & 5 and then we're asking Martinez to stand in the pocket in a five wide set instead of going high percentage with an inside run or a quick screen.

That to me is the coaches actually going too far in the direction of putting the petal to the floor instead of looking for high percentage plays to move the sticks and I was out-of-my-mind pissed about it on Saturday.

 

I am not of the opinion that this offense would be better if it ran more conservative plays with a lead.

Link to comment

The offense had a tendency to disappear for an entire quarter each game last year as well. I can't remember how often it was specifically in the 3rd quarter, but it sure seemed to be a consistent issue that even when the offense would look sharp for most of the game, there would be noticeable lulls.  

 

An entire offseason to solve the missing quarter dilemma, and now we've only seen two out of eight quarters all season to be happy about.

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...