Jump to content


12-Team Playoff On the Way; 14-Team to Follow


Recommended Posts


13 hours ago, Madcows said:

 

Because they want to reward top seeds with a bye, you can't do that with 8 or 16

Rewarding "top" seeds is the mistake.

2 hours ago, Lorewarn said:

 

 

8 really was the perfect number.

Yep. But if you're going bigger than 8, you'd obviously go to 16.

  • TBH 2
Link to comment
31 minutes ago, runningblind said:

I think 12 is fine. Reward some with a bye and have a great chance for competitive first round, on campus games.

 

100% agree.  And I love 12 because it keeps some meaningfulness to the regular season for teams you know are going to make it.  Makes winning your conference a big deal.

 

If you get to 16, may as well do away with conference championship games.  Teams playing in those would almost be at a disadvantage as it would be an extra game of wear and tear on the players.

Link to comment
16 minutes ago, Red Five said:

 

100% agree.  And I love 12 because it keeps some meaningfulness to the regular season for teams you know are going to make it.  Makes winning your conference a big deal.

 

If you get to 16, may as well do away with conference championship games.  Teams playing in those would almost be at a disadvantage as it would be an extra game of wear and tear on the players.

The trick will be to either win your conference or somehow be second best in your division and still be in the top 12. To get a bye or skip the CCG respectively. 

Link to comment

2 hours ago, Red Five said:

 

100% agree.  And I love 12 because it keeps some meaningfulness to the regular season for teams you know are going to make it.  Makes winning your conference a big deal.

 

If you get to 16, may as well do away with conference championship games.  Teams playing in those would almost be at a disadvantage as it would be an extra game of wear and tear on the players.

8+ team playoffs end a lot of the meaningfulness of the regular season. All that 12 teams does is give a biased committee a chance to "reward" 4 teams. At least powers of 2 mean every team plays the same number of playoff games.

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, RedDenver said:

8+ team playoffs end a lot of the meaningfulness of the regular season. All that 12 teams does is give a biased committee a chance to "reward" 4 teams. At least powers of 2 mean every team plays the same number of playoff games.

I don't get at all how it makes the regular season any less meaningful.  It is basically the same it's always been, you need to have a really good regular season to get to your goals.  If by that you mean a team must go undefeated in order to have a meaningful regular season, then I have never agreed with that argument and never will.

  • Plus1 3
Link to comment
Just now, runningblind said:

I don't get at all how it makes the regular season any less meaningful.  It is basically the same it's always been, you need to have a really good regular season to get to your goals.  If by "you must go undefeated in order to have a meaningful regular season", then I have never agreed with that argument and never will.

If a team can lose regular season games and still win the championship, then by definition it makes the regular season less meaningful than if they could not. You might like it better, but the regular season is still less meaningful. And being able to lose multiple games means the regular season is even less meaningful than if a team could only lose 1 game, etc.

Link to comment
4 hours ago, RedDenver said:

If a team can lose regular season games and still win the championship, then by definition it makes the regular season less meaningful than if they could not. You might like it better, but the regular season is still less meaningful. And being able to lose multiple games means the regular season is even less meaningful than if a team could only lose 1 game, etc.

That argument is flawed though.  The rules are the same for everyone to win a championship, regardless of if qualifying for a playoff is easier or harder.  The regular season still means the same, and so does winning a championship, based on the criteria of the sport.  The regular season is part of the season, so is the playoff, they aren't separate entities in any sport.

  • Plus1 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
6 hours ago, RedDenver said:

If a team can lose regular season games and still win the championship, then by definition it makes the regular season less meaningful than if they could not. You might like it better, but the regular season is still less meaningful. And being able to lose multiple games means the regular season is even less meaningful than if a team could only lose 1 game, etc.

 

I mean ... technically yes.

 

But that was already the case before we had any playoff.  So it really amounts to no difference.

  • TBH 2
Link to comment

  • Mavric changed the title to 12-Team Playoff On the Way; 14-Team to Follow
28 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Agree with Dan

 

 

 

Yeah, I'm not really a fan of guaranteeing spots (other than a G5 spot with qualifiers).  All that does is make room for better teams getting left out.

 

But I agree that the Big/ACC should jump all over this.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...