tschu Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 Just curious what you all think about the logos/divisions in the Big 10. Fire Away! Quote Link to comment
74Hunter Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 Just curious what you all think about the logos/divisions in the Big 10. Fire Away! Suck. All of them, including the stupid names attached to player/coach of the year awards. Quote Link to comment
HuskerInLostWages Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 The logo looks ok I guess, maybe it will grow on me. I see what they were trying to do by keeping the "10" with the 1 and the G, but it looks like something a pimply faced teen would come up with, not a professional designer. As for the naming of the divisions, am I the only one who thinks they sound too arrogant? It also seems to me it sounds as if it's going for "the teams that used to be awesome", the legends, and then "the people who are currently doing well, but have zero in terms of tradition", or the leaders. Last I checked Iowa has done close to nothing to be considered a "Legend" so it just sounds really stupid to me. I wont even comment on a few others in our "Legends" division who don't deserve that name in any shape or form. Just my opinion here Quote Link to comment
bball_backer Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 Logo - Don't like, but don't really care. Division names - AWFUL Trophy names - Why did they need names? Why can't they just be "Championship Trophy" "MVP Trophy" etc. Quote Link to comment
Lil' Red Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 The logo is ok but the division names are pretty corny. Quote Link to comment
Sparker Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 I don't mind "Legends". "Leaders" sucks a big one. The logo is OK except for that shade of blue is a bit too baby-y. Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 I like them. They are the greatest. /jk. But I can live with them. Quote Link to comment
AllTheGoodNamesAreTaken Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 does anyone know what the trophies were called before now? Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 I like this version of the logo. The rest of the logo variations can be seen here Other than that, not real crazy about the division names. I agree with mmmtodd and think they should've left it at X and O. The logo has a retro feel to it, but not crazy about the color. It's not bad, but it's not great either. I'll get used to it though. The trophy names is a bit too much as well. All in all, it feels like they over thought these details. Sometimes less is more. 1 Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 does anyone know what the trophies were called before now? Not sure if the B10 trophy had a name other than the Big 10 trophy. Of course there were no divisions until now, so only one trophy. Quote Link to comment
The RANT Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 This is the "New Big Ten" first utter meltdown. Who signed off on those names. Is it possible to change them? hahaa Quote Link to comment
JTrain Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 I accidentally hit Yes on the poll, but please count me a no. Logo is all kinds of wrong. Font looks straight out of a bad Western movie poster. The blue is bad too. I get that they were trying to be iconic by keeping it ultra-simple with no borders/shading/etc., it just didn't work. On the divisions, see Sparker above. Leaders??? Quote Link to comment
husker_hurdler Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 I liked the "Plains" and "Great Lakes" idea Quote Link to comment
Redmusky Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 I rather have the one the husker made up BIG TEN and the N being red Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.